Why's everyone so worried about, it looks like he's only killing Britts. The end game cut scene is gonna be some shell-shock ending where Conor has to kill some important 'Fore-father/Templar' like John Adams, Benjamin Franklin, Alexander Hamilton, John Jay,Thomas Jefferson, James Madison, or George Washington..just a thought.
this is going to better than Assassin Creed II in terms of Gameplay , Environment , Brutality but not The MAIN PROTAGONIST , Because Ezio Auditore Da Firenze IS THE BEST , Agree ??
This is badass! Can't wait to see the cities. Boston, Philadelphia, etc.
I wish the tree branches would move when you swing and land on them though.
So I watched the ship sequence demo before this and that had me unexcited for the game. This has me ready to go out after work and buy a copy.
I know the British were the imperialists at the time, I just hope they're not entirely antagonized in Assassins Creed 3. Hopefully there are some bad guys on the Patriots' side as well, or this game will feel like some Revolutionary War colonist sympathizer rather than a story of an assassin with motives of his own.
In the first AC you get annoying beggar to shoved off. In the second, you get annoying musician. From what I saw in this clip, I think we'll gonna get annoying injured soldier to shove off.
Looks like the installment that will finally breathe fresh life into the series. I like the idea of having to move swiftly, instead of being in combat for an extended amount of time.
I would love to see some more character customization, more upgradability.....that's something i loved about ac2...maybe some "skills" or move unlocks, or more armor sets...ac: b was a disapoitment in regards to armor buildup....
I know they did lots of effort on it, but i didn't impressed i think they should have gone with that Russian Assassin's Creed, and lol the branches are so strong they even don't move it's kinda funny! and that Animal part reminded me of RDR!
The gameplay looks great & they seem to have done a fantastic job capturing the free-running in the wilderness. I'm still a bit concerned about how much 'America f*** yeah' there seems to be though; the Brits so far have been portrayed almost exclusively as 'bad guys' (bar that one commander who flashes up for a brief second seemingly talking to Connor while smoking a cigar) while we're yet to see Conner kill a single American or see them behave aggressively towards him. I know Ubisoft implied that they weren't going to have bias in the game when they said that Connor only involved himself in the Templar/Assassin conflict rather than the British/American conflict & that there were Templars on both sides, but so far the footage seems to show otherwise. Am yet to watch the Ubi press conference though so fingers crossed that I'll be proved wrong.
please, and i mean PLEASE make sure you get all of the screen tearing out, that absolutely ruined the others.
What is great about this installment , is that it has fresh new ideas and not just repeating stuff from the older games .. you have both cities (not as good as those amazing cities of Italy and turkey ) and the Wilderness ! I also loved the horse animation from the previous AC games , feels very natural and stable. looking forward to get my hands on that game soon
we shall see...connor looks promising....
No 1. Gaming powerhouse? Yeah, if you BUILD it that way. No one cares about PC anymore. Get with it, boy
Their probably heavy branches that wont sway under your weight.
@Sardinar yeah there are templars on both sides. So no need to worry. People gotta remember that templars have always been the real enemy, not the brits, I dont think connor could care less what colors the templars wear.
The British back then WERE the bad guys. Thats why we (United States) rebelled. So we can have freedom from being persecuted for our beliefs.
Because you dont know what Parkour is?
@pwncakes52 No clue how you mixed cowboys with revolvers and colonials with muskets. Totally different time and region.
@pwncakes52 maybe u must too obsessed with rdr?who knows........
Not impressed? God d%mn, what does it take to impress you?
The British were the bad guys back then. You do remember WHY we revolted and went to live in a new country, right?
There was no screen tearing. Check you system.
Let me guess. Not American?
@darkvaper horse animation doesnt look that good...nothinc matches rdr in that...
which is awfully sad....
@Jake518 shh don't type that out loud, ubisoft might make it into another expansion
@grim0187 Because the Story is too goody not badass!
@grim01872/10, made me reply.
@vannacut RDR has no free running. Which one is better, realistic horses? or a fun game mechanic that lets you run across the wilderness?
@vannacut Agreed. RDR has the best animated horses I've seen in a game. My main gripe with AC's horses is how large they are and they bounce a little too much.
@vannacut What is rdr ?
@veeouw and why shouldnt they. Clearly they've had their A GAME all along. While one team kept making fun games, although repetitive, to make sure people dont forget about this franchise. An entirely different team has been working for over 2 years to build a new experience. I think thats a great idea. We can keep gaming on a franchise we love, and know that somehting greater is on the way.
@Lady_Owl Yeah, they do look big in AC, although they might have modeled them that way because people were smaller back then.
@Commanche2k5 Hmm honestly i haven't , thanks :)
RDR has nice horses. I'm glad they're bring them back for AC3.
@darkvaper Red Dead Redemption. If you haven't played it, you should. It is fantastic.