just bought it for 9.99 brand new, i knew both of the Kane and Lynch games were disapointing for alot of reviewers but for a 10 i said what the hell lol
i got this today... and finished it today, litterally 3 hours long. It was a blash all the way through though, some cheap deaths and the camera at times could be annoying but all in all a decent game. I tried the online but not 1 person was online :( its a shame because according to this review and plenty of others the online is great
love and enjoyed the game, it's awesome man, especially the SP. awesome graphics and gunplay too. don't know why u guys hate it... give it a shot and enjoy it. still a must play for those love 3rd-person shooter. honestly, I think it deserves a 7 or 7.5 (btw I hate the first, it was terrible)
@Murgurth Haha, Kane is naked covered in cuts and blood and is trying to kill a guy. :P While I won't be looking at the Kane and Lynch games as fully innovative industry changing games, I just don't see why people don't get into this series more. I mean...fun is fun people.
The only good part about Dead Men was fragile Allience, and it got old and I sold my copy. Dog Days would be better if they left some of the stuff from Dead Men in. If I had to buy either of them, I would buy Dog Days, use the disc as a coaster, the case to hold lsot DVDs and the instruction booklet as toilet paper. :D
@Sardiner Jeff deserved to be harsh the game was broken and thats still not a good reason to fire someone
@dancingsmurfs01 Jeff is more opinionated and is not afraid to speak his mind, watch his review, it's a LOT harsher. The emphasis on the word 'bad' makes me giggle.
this is not an a good CD he have an something not good for the child's...... i m laying on you Ha Ha Ha Ha Haaaaa ********
Single most repetitive game I've ever played. They really don't stress how stale it gets halfway through the game. Shoot cut scene shoot cut scene shoot game over. It's already shooting down in price because it's so bad. Get the first and skip this overpriced piece of trash.
lol jeff gets fired for rating the first one with a 6 but justin does not get fired for rating it a 6.5 -----R.I.P. JEFF-----
I have to say that the premiss for the story of these two guys is still cool. Too bad they seem to get short changed by the people responsible for bringing them to life. Despite what I saw I will buy it used using my gamestop dollar rating of 20$. I just really like coop games.
The game is definitely an improvement from the first one, but as others stated the singleplayer is too short.
@JusticeCovert Here's the thing, how come all the other reviewers resigned then???????????? And calm down Im just stating my opinion
Thanks gamespot for giving people thumbs down on their comments. Gamespot can give thumbs down on comments they don't like.
Since when does length = quality? If anything, it's not worth full price but that doesn't make it a bad game, and it shouldn't be penalized with bad/mediocre scores for it. And even then, I'd rather play a short but sweet game than a long "it was cool at the beginning but now it feels like a chore, might not even finish it" one.
ok... A, this game is better than the first B. once i get a campaign thats not 4 hours long then i'll shell out $60 C. kevin should be doing EVERY review this was a boring review and if u want to make games seem at all interesting than have kevin do it
WHy do they make games today so short????? Time to pull out my N64, these modern games are over too fast.
Looks like a gritty successor to the original K&L. Really love the amateur camera style this game adopts, but the gun play, and less incentive on variety, kinda makes this a step sideways rather then a step forward in the series.