@HIGHMAX45 I agree. I wouldn't really compare this to many other FPS games. It's like comparing F-zero to Mario Kart.
this games is awasome! the game itself looks amazing stunning level design. the wi-fi is great my favourite bit about the game, if your planning on getting the game i would recomend getting the classic controller pack! 9.0 prime!
@HaloOverrated I advise you to play Goldeneye on Nintendo 64 and then to replay this, you will notice many differences.
It was a masterpiece on the Nintendo 64 and now has been reduced to just another clone of Call of Duty, what a disappointment!
this game is fun except that often you find that you kill someone and they kill you at exactly the same time. this is really annoying but the game is still great
Looking below the comments, it's a little funny how people are just throwing little facts and more opinions. And what I found stupid is that some people compare every damn FPS games to CoD. I know CoD is a very damn good FPS but it's stupid to mention or compare CoD to every FPS you see. I'm sorry but it really is stupid, especially comparing a game that came first before CoD ever existed.
is the classic controller pro worth it? could you like if you think yes and thumbs down if you think no
@chrispicard But the new MoH plays a lot like Airborne, except it's in a modern setting, so can you say that it copies CoD? If anything, CoD copied MoH. Also, the gameplay in Goldeneye is not the exact same. I can explain the differences. You're obviously just judging it by this video, saying, "Oh, the gameplay here looks like CoD, so it's definitely a clone!" Besides, the thing about graphics is still not a legitimate excuse to say that the game is useless. What kind of gamer would play a CoD clone JUST for graphics?
@HaloOverrated I'm aware the MoH "franchise" was created before the first CoD, i played them both. I'm refering to the new MoH being a CoD clone, well it's a CoD slash Battlefield Hybrid actually. Graphics are VERY important when you're playing a REALISTIC shooter, the more REAL it looks the better, it's more imersive, the graphics are the window to the game world. What's the benefit of having crummy graphics like the new Golden eye has, when the gameplay is exactly the same as a game that looks so much better?...
@chrispicard HAHA, the MoH franchise came BEFORE the CoD franchise. FAIL! Is every shooter that allows you to aim down iron sights a CoD clone, to you? Also, I have to seriously disagree with you about how important graphics are in games, and this is coming from a PS3 fan.
@HaloOverrated Losing credibility for what? Why I gave 4.5 to Perfect Dark? Maybe you did not understand one thing: TO ME, Perfect Dark sucks. Why should I give a high score in a game that I did not like? I do not care if the game is 9.9, I played and I hated it. Stop
@HaloOverrated YES, this IS a CoD clone, so are MoH and Killzone 2, but atleast they have good graphics too! CoD 4 and MW2 are basically the same game, using the same game engine, with basically the same graphical quality, so no it's not like saying that at all.
@OtherFabbros You pretty much lost your credibility by giving Perfect Dark a 4.5 for being a ripoff of Goldeneye.
@chrispicard That's like saying, "Why play CoD4 when it's just MW2 with worse graphics?" Because it ISN'T. It's arguably a better game.
This game is fun to play not like the unplayable MW2 with the Kill streaks that just kill the gameplay and another thing is that I really don't feel like this plays like Call of duty. It iseems different and graphics are bad but have you played MAG on PS3 they are extremely comparable . Not to mention that htis probably plays better than MAG anyway. If you have a Wii deffinately check this one out if you don't stick to other games they're fun too but I enjoy this one cause is what I've been wanting from an FPS all this time to be simple enjoyable and easy to play....
@cefer1234 "Maybe graphics aren't everything?" - of course they're not everything...BUT... as i said.... the game is just the same as call of duty/medal of honor etc on the HD consoles but with worse graphics. So WHY? would anyone choose it over a better looking game that plays exactly the same?
looks like allot of fun golden eye has always bin fun i still play the original sometimes for that fact
Looks like a stellar FPS for the Wii. Hopefully I will be able to get it soon with the Gold Classic Controller! :D
@OtherFabbros You wanted the 007 from the 64 to be updated to the Wii. You failed to realize that Activision makes this game, giving it all this Call of Duty feel. I feel for you on most of that, but your score is so low. The games is pretty much Call of Bond, but thats not a bad thing when, thats the only way to make a fps on the Wii work. The Conduit tried but, didn't really work. You should have payed attention to them saying re-imagining all b4 this game came out. Also If you want to play classic mode, then play the classic mode.
@MaddogQ80 You would be right. The same makers in fact, People wont know how much this is like COD until they play, down to the perks i mean "gadgets" weapon attachments and noob tubes. I use the GC controller and it works great. A little tweak of settings and i'm ready to go. The only problem is you can't jump, but... you don't really need to.
@OtherFabbros LOL, dude, I read your review of GoldenEye. You called it a bad game simply because it borrows elements from Reflex. That is not how you review a game, dude. Sonic & Sega: All Stars Racing is a Mario Kart clone, yet does that make it a bad game? No. The similarities to Reflex only go so far. I doubt you really played the game, since you seem to think that it's a complete ripoff.