By the way, Last stand, the completely worthless perk 3 was not taken out. The death streak Final Stand has returned.
this looks...JUST like MW2...wtf..They didn't even change the HUD...the guns, look a little different...but they sound the same, weird...BF3, I choose youuuuuuuu!
@aaronfhff123 Are you serious? Why don't you do some research before making comments about the game engines. Both MW2 and MW3 use different engines from each-other and from CoD4.
money comes out when you shoot people? Does anyone else find this really really lame? How about instead of money, show impact wounds and gore. This is an M rated game.... make it realistic.
@XSV-Vendetta they have not adapted to anything. treyarch at least tryed to update the engine with bullet wounds on enemy bodies and gore(too bad the campaigns remain shallow and shorter than ever)....Infinity Ward and MW have been using the same engine with NO updates since COD4. They could of at least updated the engine to make it possible to open and close doors, shoot out lights, see bullet damage on your enemies, blow off limbs with grenades, etc.... MW3 is a joke. it is really the second expansion pack for COD4MW, in disguise as a full length game.
@USArmySniper529 "This looks exactly like MW2.. This is not a new game. You have to be an idiot to spend 60 dollars on this. BF3!!!!!!!" -It is MW2 with a BRAND NEW NAME of course, the so called MW3..and yes you are an idiot if you bite this!!! DarthRomit "All of u r dumbasses MW3 is gonna be bigger than battlefield will ever be!!!" -really? in what sense, sales??? let see about that!!! if BF3 will outsell mw3, then all of you CoD Fanboys are goners!!! bye-bye..COD4:MW is the best FPS on 2007..yes we are foolish and dumb ass for playing mw2 and BO..but you guys are going to be the dumbest of all time for buying mw3!!!
@aaronfhff123 He is on the brink of suffering the same fate as Duke Nukem- time away to fade into irrelevance and dissatisfaction.
WHAT MAKES PEOPLE WANT TO PLAY THIS STILL!!!!!!! honestly this game has been around for how many years now? IT IS NOT FUN ANYMORE
@GreySeven where is Gordon Freeman when you need him to save us from these crappy Modern Borfare games?
Another Modern Borfare with extremely short and linear campaign. You still can't open doors in these games or even shoot a lightbulb out, you still can't see bullet wounds or gore...we are on the 3rd Modern Warfare game and not one improvement has been made to enhance the engine...this game is going to suck. Everyone save your money for Skyrim, GTA 5, and Max Payne 3.
You people are impossible to please; if it deviated too much from previous CoD titles everyone would hate on it, the game sticks to what it does best and you call it a repeat. You completely overlook all of the new features of the game and continually point out the same arguments; the graphics are the same, the menus are the same, the icons haven't changed, the sound effects are the same. You're all a bunch of whiners that won't be happy with whatever Activision produces and instead of looking at positive changes in the game you complain about the strengths the developers decided to keep. Evolution isn't about changing every single thing about an item, it's about playing to your strengths and adapting. MW2.5 my ass...
claymores and granades much less powerfull.. ruined the game.. like black ops. with all those nonsence exeptions for atachments and so on, i will keep playing mw2 , it is still the most awsome 6 vs 6 search and destroy game ever..
This looks exactly like MW2.. This is not a new game. You have to be an idiot to spend 60 dollars on this. BF3!!!!!!!
If you want a realistic battlefield experience that's as close to real war as video games can take us, then battlefield is the way to go. If u want to team up with 10 year olds and prestige 10 times doing the same thing over and over then mw3 is for you. Either way, BF3 will be the best shooter of all time, untill BF4 comes around
Looking at these forums with all you guys sucking battlefields teets is sickening. MW2 was an amazing game and you know you all played it for days on end. Just because they didn't mess with the formula too much that's a bad thing? How dare take an award winning multiplayer experience and not totally flip it around and screw it up. Something is obviously wrong with them. Half of you have no idea that Balck Ops was made by a whole different team. But you go ahead and keep judging MW on that piece of crap game. Congratulations on being ignorant.
welll... this looks and sounds and plays just like MW2... I was disappointed with MW2 and never got BlackOps but I've had every previous CoD game and this just looks to be another annual rushed CoD game with nothing new. I think we should teach Activison a lesson with our wallets. Don't buy what looks like DLC or an expansion. When their sales are unacceptable that means to them, the game itself is unacceptable. The only way to get through to these people is with money; so don't give it to them! On the bright side, BF3 will be better anyway, and Skyrim is just around the corner!
speaking as a developer i would appreciate it if viewers would stop giving away our secret . . . yes this is MW2 but stupid kids will still buy it :D
so they took the best from cod4 and mw2 and made mw3? What about all the great things from black ops? This is what I hate about having two developers. They act like the other does not exist and quote things being new and improved, when honestly black ops seems way beyond this game. Combat Training was really impressive, and zombies, while I hate that mode, was still impressive building upon WaW's zombie mode. With just a multiplayer and a spec ops, campaign better be good at best. Another reason to like Treyarch CoD games more.
OH look, MW3 is everywhere here on Gamespot. Activision must have bought this website! And even after that HUGE amount of money spent on marketing, BF3 will be the best game! Pathetic !
Its funny how they just ignore the advancements made in Black Ops and act like everything in MW3 that was first introduced in Black Ops and not featured in MW2 is considered "new". Things like reticule customization and trapped care packages are already done. Just because it wasn't in MW2 doesn't mean its a new idea.
Look guys it's pretty obvious that BF3 looks more impressive than MW3, i'm definitely getting BF3 before MW3, but lets not tear CoD apart, there are small differences in MW3 that will make big differences while playing in the multiplayer (im not goner name all the new features). MW3 will still be a great game even if BF3 is a superb one.
It's bothering me that so much of this looks and sounds exactly like MW2, from weapon effects to the fonts, colors, and icons on the HUD. The one big change to multiplayer that I'm happy about is the Strike Packages thing, particularly with the introduction of a support-focused one that can be used more for aiding teammates. Aside from that, unfortunately, everything else seems to be pretty much the same old game we've been playing since 2007. Not that I don't love COD4 (it's an amazing game), but the series has stagnated. It's time to innovate again.
holy crap holy crap holy crap! you can level up your weapons and get attachments!!!! AND NOW YOU CAN EVEN CUSTOMIZE YOUR RETICULE! they are always coming up with these new ideas that have NEVER been done before *cough cough* ill pass on this
stop comparing COD and BF -.- why not shine some light on less popular shooters like payday the heist, hard reset, or red orchestra 2? BF and COD are not the only shooters out there : P
@criticfromhell how you can put killzone and resistance in the same sentence as battlefield or even mw3 is beyond me....playstation exclusives suck ass...oh yes im afraid they do
seriously, why is everything on the front page of this website call of duty? thought IGN were the fanboys
where's the tag of the player who picked the bomb or who got the first blood, i loved tag of mw2, you had to win it....