wow. The number of people in the comments hating on this game is unbelievable. Especially when they claim to hate cod in general. I actually think its looked descent. I mean it now has player choice that can effect missions and effectively the whole story.
Guys, really. Look at the graphics not compared to previous games, but as a stand-alone. The graphics look great. Huge environments, different art style, and 60 FRAMES PER SECOND. 60 FPS is extremely hard to achieve. So yes. I think they need a new generation of hardware to really expand graphically. That goes for any game.
The game itself hasn't proved to be boring although they demoed what is didn't want to see which was zombies (cant wait!) and some multiplayer. Say what u want about being the same thing ever year but its normally a good action campaign every year and if u enjoy the multiplayer you notice the changes. As for the graphics they aren't gonna get much better than that because of the hardware currently for xbox, but its still the best looking first person shooter running at 60fps
BLOPS 2 will probably be another Call of duty solid shooter. Yet this doesn't hide the fact that it needs new game play mechanics to make it feel fresh and new, I guess this is something that only time will tell.
Disappointing once again. The only thing that will be good about it will be that everyone will have it. Same as the previous CoDs
Call of Duty: Black Ops II looked good. The graphics are still a bit dated, but also looked to be a bit better than in previous Call of Duty games. All of the new future tech looked really cool, especially the sniper rifle. The branching paths and flyable jet stuff looked like mere window dressing to me, though; I'm hoping for more drastic diversions in the final game.
Didn't find this demo enteraining. They added the moment when u had to make a choice to stay up top or go down. It just didnt grab me atm there are a ton of other shooters present and future that look more promising.
As I played every Call of Duty there is (Even for the PS2 and the PSP), I'd say the much older games are far better than now, older Call of Duty's span at least three campaigns with 20+ long missions. Even Roads to Victory is long and good, now it's just one freakin' storyline, a few different characters, few locations, and too scripted.
Am I the only one who noticed that the Gameplay looks exactly the same as any other CoD? They just reskinned the guns so they look different, added random flying objects and, brief and mediocre jet flying to "wow" the crowd. It doesn't seem very impressive.
Saw the demo on youtube and i must say , the graphics looks slighty better , the mechanics are a little different and look good ( like how enemy's fall when you kill them ) and looks interesting storyline. I know it's all activision idea to bring out a COD every year , but i must say. Treyach is much better then infinity on bringing out new COD .
I can't wait tell day 1 of E3 coverage we should see a hole lot on this game. Oh sorry I made a real comment.
@d12dotcom It was boring... really boring... just an iteration on every COD game since COD4 to be honest. Maybe the story will be interesting but the game play was so meh. Plus it was pretty ugly compared to the other games we saw. Microsoft should have ended with Halo 4 because that really was the MS E3 2012 centerpiece.
@Tsuchikage "Looked to be a bit better"
Modern Warfare 2 was my last COD and that game looks better than this.
so zombies,strike force, combat training, wager match and mulitplayer are borin huh oh wait we haven't seen anything except storymode
@dipset_hobo no your not the only one who noticed, in fact everybody noticed about 5 games ago
They look the same..
@Jebus213 Then what are you guys doing here then ? go back to MW2 then . Can you blame them for bringing out a COD every year with the profit they make of it ! only stupid people woudn't do that. Getting tired of this whining , like it's gonne get you somewhere. They brought a new COD out , Be a man and accept it