•  
  • smokeyf
  • Level: 23 (51%) 
  • Rank: Super Bagman
  • Member since: May 22, 2004
  • Last online: 12/22/09 6:28 pm PT
  • My Emblems:
    • Rank: Total Access Subscriber
    • Greatest Game Hero Preliminary Voter
    • Virtually There: E3 2009 Day 3
    • Virtually There: E3 2008 GameSpot Show Sushi
    • Readers' Choice 2007 Chooser
    • Xbox 360 Aficionado
    • Virtually There: E3 2007 Microsoft Conference.
    • I voted
    • Rank: Total Access Subscriber
    • Virtually There: E3 2006 Sony Conference
    • I voted
    • Virtually There: E3 2007 Microsoft Conference.
    • Xbox 360 Aficionado
    • Readers' Choice 2007 Chooser
    • Virtually There: E3 2008 GameSpot Show Sushi
    • Virtually There: E3 2009 Day 3
    • Greatest Game Hero Preliminary Voter
     
     
    Close

My Recent Ratings

Title Score
Assassin's Creed II 9.5
Left 4 Dead 8.0
Borderlands 9.5
Batman: Arkham Asylum 10
F.E.A.R. 2: Project Origin 7.0
Resident Evil 5 9.5
Far Cry 2 9.0
Prince of Persia 8.0
Call of Duty: World at War 8.5
Fallout 3 9.5

All About smokeyf

Recent Blog Posts

  • 22Apr 08

    Half-assed Multiplayer

    I've recently started enjoying online CONSOLE multiplayer more than I used to. Xbox games that are now being made with a mutliplayer mode in mind right from the begining are turning out quite good. I don't like games that add online multiplayer as a halfassed way to get "xbox live" on their back cover. Some games (Condemned 2) should never have added and didn't need to add online mutliplayer. RSV2 is a perfect example of how to do it right. The first was OK with the co-op but they had to butcher the story mode to make it work. The second one fixed it and look how well its doing. Sure, mutliplayer can be incorporated into any game format, but some times it just shouldn't be. Spend the dev. time on perfecting a single player mode instead of wasting that time on half-assed multiplayer. In fact, I think a lot of good games are getting a lot of bad reviews because of their poorly planned multiplayer.

  • 29Jan 08

    Age of Conan Xbox360 Subscription Rates

    Does anyone fully understand how this game will be handled as far as on and offline play? Will someone be able to play up to level 20 offline(no subscription fee) and then have to start subscribing after that to progress within the game? It may be a lot for people to swallow: internet fee, Xbox live fee and then a subscription fee! I'd be willing to simply pay extra for the game and get (x)months of subscription time and not have to worry about it after that. Has anyone heard of any solutions for Console users in this matter. I don't believe there have been any successful subscription games for consoles for this reason. Also, will PC and Xboxers be within the same world? I'm looking forward to playing this game, all costs aside. I just hope there will be other people than myself roaming around Hyboria.
    • Posted Jan 29, 2008 2:01 pm PT
    • Category: Games
    • 0 Comments

See Previous Blog Posts »

My Recent Reviews

Some people just don't have opinions. Like smokeyf.

Recent Images

smokeyf's Feed

  • Dec 1, 2009 7:05 pm PT
    smokeyf gave Assassin's Creed II a score of 9.5
  • Nov 27, 2009 5:31 pm PT
    smokeyf added Left 4 Dead 2 to their owned game list
  • Nov 27, 2009 5:31 pm PT
    smokeyf Invalid Feed Item.
  • Nov 27, 2009 5:31 pm PT
    smokeyf gave Left 4 Dead a score of 8.0
  • Nov 17, 2009 10:16 pm PT
    smokeyf added Assassin's Creed II to their owned game list
  • Nov 7, 2009 9:00 am PT
    smokeyf added Dragon Age: Origins to their now playing list
  • Nov 4, 2009 6:09 am PT
    smokeyf added Dragon Age: Origins to their owned game list
  • Oct 21, 2009 6:16 am PT
    smokeyf gave Borderlands a score of 9.5
  • Oct 21, 2009 6:15 am PT
    smokeyf added Borderlands to their now playing list
  • Oct 21, 2009 6:15 am PT
    smokeyf added Borderlands to their owned game list

Now Playing

advertisement

Tracked Blogs

Online IDs

Xbox Gamertag

My Unions

My RSS