•  
  • lobomensch
  • Level: 1 (25%) 
  • Rank: Player
  • Member since: Aug 8, 2005
  • Last online: 03/20/09 11:31 pm PT
  • My Emblems:
    • Rank: Registered Member
    • Convivial
    • Rank: Registered Member
    • Convivial
     
     

My Friends

lobomensch's Blog

  • 14Sep 09
    I had recently come back to check on my editorships and noticed where, after being gone for only 3 days, I was reported MIA on a person guide by someone with obviously nothing better to do with their time. This person was a Level 3 with only 15 submissions, 5 of them rejected. I checked my mod queue and found where they had written a couple which I proceeded to verify and credit the whiner for. Now I find an e-mail telling me I have been retired from that editorship DESPITE checking on it on a regular basis. No wonder I grew tired of this site some time ago, having dealt with surly staff members and flamers on the boards; now it's come to penny-ante retaliations by jealous lower level children. What kind of pay-off do we get from this site, any way, other than more work than it's worth?
    • Posted Sep 14, 2009 9:41 am PT
    • Category: People
    • 5 Comments
  • 4Jun 09
    Just read where David passed away in Bangkok, according to Yahoo news. No details have been given yet but it appears to have been from natural causes. My condolences to David's family and friends, and thanks for the wonderful memories David gave me in his performance as Kwai Chang Caine, on Kung Fu.
    • Posted Jun 4, 2009 8:25 am PT
    • Category: News
    • 5 Comments
  • 18Dec 08
    Now I'm depressed. The First Lady Of Trek and my favorite intergalactic Auntie Mame passed at 12:27 this morning from leukemia. My condolences go to her family and I remember all too well what a sad holiday season it was for Trek fans in 1991 when Gene passed, doubly so now. You will be missed, Majel.
    • Posted Dec 18, 2008 6:34 pm PT
    • Category: People
    • 4 Comments
  • 19Sep 08
    As to which is more annoying -- the new Bugstravaganza permeating this site or people reviewing a show and calling it "My New Best Friend". Runners-up include reviews for shows like The Riches that say "Ahead of it's time" and people that have like 5,000 tag lines/icons/show names/et al. at the end of every note they post.
    • Posted Sep 19, 2008 1:20 pm PT
    • Category: N/A
    • 4 Comments
  • 7Apr 08
    Superman #261

    Gives new meaning to a spit-shine.

    Superman #192

    Spare the Kryptonite, spoil the child?

    Adventure Comics #259

    Hope Krypto doesn't run into any wayward butterflies.

    • Posted Apr 7, 2008 9:36 am PT
    • Category: N/A
    • 5 Comments
  • 26Mar 08

    21 down and many more to go.... To celebrate my favorite TV.com friend's coming of age, I have chosen a few of my favorite misguided covers...live long and prosper (and today's Leonard Nimoy's too, yah!)

    Detective Comics #829

    • Posted Mar 26, 2008 3:45 pm PT
    • Category: N/A
    • 9 Comments
  • 18Feb 08
    I really enjoy reading comments (and stories) from other friends here, but really don't stop to talk much myself. You can probably guess why... I'm watching TV in most of my spare time. Actually movies and TV. In between having several hundred TV series on DVD as well as thousands of new and old movies I'm accumulating on DVD. Maybe I should start reporting on what I've watched, like new releases and info on classic TV/movies I get as well? Haven't gone bug-eyed yet from viewing, I think...
    • Posted Feb 18, 2008 7:47 pm PT
    • Category: N/A
    • 7 Comments
  • 26Dec 06

    Cleared out for spring-cleaning.

    • Posted Dec 26, 2006 10:38 pm PT
    • Category: N/A
    • 5 Comments
  • 24Dec 06

    I haven't been on much lately - well, past several months actually, life has a way of interfering with that.  But I haven't forgotten the ones I enjoy talking with here, especially now, in the season to remember the ones you do cherish.   I really hope this finds you all doing well and I wish you good health and cheer!

  • 2Sep 06

    The possible prequel disaster facing the Star Trek franchise is still a ways off, but the butchering of Classic Trek has already begun, with the announcement of the original Trek having CGI added effects in the way of planets and shots of the Enterprise, as well as a re-worked theme song.

    Is this to appeal to the low-attention span crowd?  They wouldn't be fans to begin with, let alone watch it, so why do it?  A main part of this show, the recognition factor, will be lost.

    It may be sentimental, but there is a certain comfort in seeing those regular fly-by shots and the orange planet that kept popping up, in that you knew what to expect, even if you tuned in from another channel.  In doing this, it will simply be adding more CGI out there to a public that is already tiring of it.

    The original series was a product of it's times, and made by people that were given very little to work with.  It should be shown to future generations in the context of what they accomplished, not what revisionists think will make people happy.  It may look dated to the eye, but will remain forward in it's ideology.

    • Posted Sep 2, 2006 7:42 am PT
    • Category: N/A
    • 8 Comments
  • 26Aug 06

    Thought I'd try posting a video, and lucky me, got it right the first time.  Hope you enjoy it!

    Now under my videos.

    • Posted Aug 26, 2006 4:50 am PT
    • Category: N/A
    • 8 Comments
  • 13Aug 06

    I am so sick of this heat already.  And August isn't even over yet.  Any way, here's something new, from 1967.  Or is that old?  This annual features the first appearance of the major FF villain, the Psycho Man, but even more important is that this features the first time the Silver Surfer had been featured in a story all his own, which would lead to his own magazine.  Hope you like it!

    • Posted Aug 13, 2006 10:28 am PT
    • Category: N/A
    • 3 Comments
  • 6Aug 06

    Cleaned out, making room for others

    .

  • 6Aug 06

    I'm a David Lynch fan.  Yes, I know it's twisted and disturbed, but I make no apologies.  But I have to say I really freaked when I saw one of his first films, "The Alphabet."  Scared the hell out of me.

    Being a child of the late 60s-70s, this really recalled some bad memories of public education at that time.  In particular was how PBS, during the day on our local affilliate, would run this really surreal and outright bizarre interlude between programs. This usually consisted of a landscape made of blocks, half-built facades of buildings, and other props that were shown in a totally dark studio, illuminated by different black lights, usually in purple/blue/green colors.  The camera would pan around the scenery and in the background electronic music would play, or sometimes it was just shown in total silence, with a list of state afilliates for PBS in white letters on the lower left hand corner of the screen would be shown.  It looked like something Andy Warhol would've dreamed about, and it was unnerving being a small child seeing that.  Lynch's film struck a chord with me in recalling that; the dehumanization of the educational process that went on then, due to people whining about schools "teaching kids evil values" in the Nixon era and in turn making it a sterile, rote environment where ideas were just dumped out rather than discussed, in studies. Check out "David Lynch Alphabet" or some combination thereof on YouTube to see what I mean.  Totally demented but a work of real genius.  Don't watch, however, if you are squeamish and/or are offended by the sight of blood.

    And in further news ala Lynch, am glad he has a new film coming out, with some of his crew from "Wild At Heart".  And one of his early films will be on TCM on September 15, at 8:00 PM CST, am curious to see just how out there it is, too.  Why oh why can't he have a regular show on broadcast TV again, like "Twin Peaks"?  I'd rather have his bizarre and disturbing fantasy perspective on there than the grotesque and stupid reality show glut we have now.

    • Posted Aug 6, 2006 9:42 am PT
    • Category: N/A
    • 8 Comments
  • 3Aug 06

    Deanna gave me a good lesson on images in blog, so hope I get this right.  Thank you, Deanna!

    What you see above is Batman #171, from my personal collection.  It was the first time The Riddler had appeared in either Batman or Detective comics since 1948, year on this is 1965.  The story, written by Gardner Fox (whose profile I also edit), was the basis for the pilot episode of the television series in 1966.  Rather garish pink, I agree, but it does stand out, which is why I decided to try it out on my blog.  Will post more if you like. (and if I don't mess this one up) 

    • Posted Aug 3, 2006 6:35 am PT
    • Category: N/A
    • 9 Comments
  • 24Jul 06
    Saw "Pirates Of The Carribean: Dead Man's Chest" last week, and haven't really felt inclined to say much about it, since.  This movie really NEEDED tighter editing.  One action sequence involving a water wheel should've rightfully ended after about 5 minutes tops but seemed to drag on for 15.  Too much concentration on slapstick as well; the original didn't dumb it down for kiddies/yokels the way this did in certain scenes.  I won't say the movie was a total bust, Johnny Depp was his usual entertaining self and there was some plot progression in setting up the finale.  Also of note was Davy Jones' makeup, very reminiscent of Cthulu.  I noticed some homages to "Evil Dead" and "The Thing" (Carpenter version) here, but those alone didn't help the whole feel of this, like one action sequence strung to another with blathering/meandering chick-flick dialogue/angst in between.  Another case of appealing to demographics rather than an audience.  And what was the reason for wanting Davy Jones' Heart, for Jack any way?  Was it to free him of being undead or allowing him to finally die?  Too vaguely addressed.  I give this 3 out of 5.  Definitely wait for DVD rental if you haven't seen yet.
    • Posted Jul 24, 2006 1:59 pm PT
    • Category: N/A
    • 8 Comments
  • 12Jul 06

    I know I've posted this over in the Trek topics before, but am curious to hear from other people that don't hang out there often as to what they like to collect.

    My main interest has been comics, have around 100,000.  Have a few Atomic Age and a good deal of Silver and Bronze as well and loads of Modern, of course.  I also like to collect movie posters, have a number of those, including some error prints as well.  Also like Hallmark Keepsake Ornaments, have between 500 to 700, haven't counted in a while.  Plenty of different action figures and older toys, as well as a good bit of comic statues.  My personal favorite isn't a comic character but one of the Alien Queen from "Aliens". 

    And last but not least (don't want to flog this to death) around 1200 DVDs, with about 250 different TV series.  Would like to know what interests everyone else out there.

  • 29Jun 06

    Saw this today at a digital theater.  Pretty good, though will stop short of saying it was outstanding.  Noticed where it borrowed a lot from previous incarnations of Superman, notably the main plot concerning Lex Luthor in the 1978 movie, as well as John Byrne's re-interpretation of Superman, Lois Lane, and Luthor in the 1986 mini-series "The Man Of Steel," and including a key element of Alan Moore's "Whatever Happened To The Man Of Tomorrow?" story from Action #583 and Superman #423. Some of the scenes with Routh's face appeared to have some digital tweaks, to me, in giving some of Reeve's expressions.  Will say Singer definitely did a better job with this than X-Men, so there is some real hope for this franchise being revived.

    Am glad they didn't bring any of that "Smallville" dreck approach to him here, and can also say it was a real treat seeing Langella as Perry White, fine reversal of the typecast he has had for so many years now.  Could say more, but I don't like spoiling things too much.  Worth seeing at the theater, definitely for the title sequence giving the 1978 sequence a new spin as well as the destruction of Krypton.

    • Posted Jun 29, 2006 4:23 pm PT
    • Category: N/A
    • 9 Comments
  • 17Jun 06
    Made person editor for Keye Luke today, one of my main favorites here, from "Kung Fu" of course.  I wonder what happens when someone gets say 30 badges, where do they get the room to show them?  =)  Hope to see more in the future.
    • Posted Jun 17, 2006 8:09 am PT
    • Category: N/A
    • 6 Comments
  • 15Jun 06

    Was going throuugh announcements on IMDb.com today, and saw where Paramount has cast Eminem as Paladin in a remake of "Have Gun Will Travel."

    Is there any depth Hollywood won't sink to now, to make a buck?  I am not fond of remakes in general, but I have given some remakes a look and my appreciation for being faithful to the source material.  This movie is ANYTHING but.

    According to their announcement, this will be in a "modern, contemporary setting."  Excuse me, HGWT was a WESTERN.  Shows how much contempt they have not only for the fans of HGWT (and there are a LOT of us out here, that grew up with this series, over the past 5 decades at that!) but how cheap they are, not wanting to film on location in the West as HGWT did.

    It is not only an insult to us, but ESPECIALLY Richard Boone, who along with the writers, took great care to fashion and give us a character that was literate, civilized, and thoughtful, prone to seeking the intelligent way out of a situation, using force only as a last resort.  It was a forerunner of two of my other favorite socially-aware shows, Star Trek and Kung Fu, in handling topics that other shows would avoid altogether, like racism and treatment of women with respect.  Not to mention the fact that Roddenberry and Coon both contributed to his character, and later on the series I just mentioned, a benchmark of quality in television's growing days, giving us a character for the ages, literally, one that harkened to tales of errant knights and noble samurai. 

    And who should Paramount choose to play this character?  Someone that has bragged about his hatred towards women and love of violence in his so-called "music."  A loud-mouthed 9th grade drop-out.   The shortest way I can think of to express my feelings on this choice -- this TRAVESTY -- is that I am absolutely livid.  Must every good thing of the past be trashed and violated so they can pander to what Paramount feels is an ignorant demographic?   I have a lot more faith in our younger generation than these jerks would believe -- and I hope they will join me in turning their backs totally on this waste of film.

    Here's betting they'll have that fool wearing the chess piece as a piece of "bling-bling" -- and that I will tear down any promotional poster I see of this vomit, too.

    • Posted Jun 15, 2006 5:20 pm PT
    • Category: N/A
    • 2 Comments
advertisement