- ahren
- Level: 30 (45%)
- Rank: Wicked Sick!
- Member since: May 16, 2003
- Last online: 12/23/09 7:20 pm PT
-
My Emblems:
- Rank: Registered Member
- Popular
- Virtually There: E3 2008 The Big Three Conferences
- Readers' Choice 2007 Chooser
- I voted
- Virtually There: E3 2006 Microsoft Conference
- Virtually There: E3 2006 Nintendo Conference
- Virtually There: E3 2006 Sony Conference
- Rank: Registered Member
- Popular
- Old-School
- Commercial Challenge 2004 / Ballot Puncher
- Readers' Choice 2004 Chooser
- Readers' Choice 2005 Chooser
- Tagger Maker
- Virtually There: E3 2006 Sony Conference
- Virtually There: E3 2006 Nintendo Conference
- Virtually There: E3 2006 Microsoft Conference
- I voted
- Readers' Choice 2007 Chooser
- Virtually There: E3 2008 The Big Three Conferences
My Friends
-
RacinJason online
-
Shantrix online
-
AuronCloud7 online
-
nellyg619 online
-
olegnapiano online
-
DEATH775 online
-
sokerball86 online
-
EdgecrusherAza online
-
webby1 offline
-
Apollo5000 offline
All About ahren
Recent Blog Posts
-
27Oct 09
Should You Discover Uncharted?
With the release of Uncharted 2 just a few short weeks ago, I would imagine many people who missed out on playing Uncharted: Drake's Fortune are wondering if they should go back and give it a try before playing the hotly anticipated sequel.The answer: yeah, kind of, at least for a little bit.Before, I continue, let me just state, unequivocally that Uncharted: Drake's Fortune is a breathtaking spectacle of a game. The biggest draws of Uncharted are the characters, their animations and the lush, rich graphical detail of the world they inhabit. Secondary, and probably most importantly to a video game however, is the gameplay. Unfortunately, the gameplay in Uncharted isn't as compelling as the visuals.As Nathan Drake, you will spend too much of your time firing bullets into ammo-sponge pirates. These pirates can take multiple shotgun blasts before they go down. In between blasts, you'll want to duck and cover, using a cover based system that, 2 years after the game's release, is starting to feel a little antiquated. What's more, is that while you are hiding behind cover you need to make sure you know where all your enemies are, otherwise you risk getting flanked.
While it's refreshing to know that you can't just stay hidden behind a rock for an entire gunfight without your adversaries getting wise, in later battles it can be frustrating to have to repeat a section a couple times only because you didn't know from what vantage point your enemies were shooting you. Hiding behind cover is one thing, staying on the move is another, but the sniper on the ridge behind you with the grenade launcher just feels like a cheap shot.
But don't get the wrong impression, it's not all bad. The gunplay in Uncharted is tough and and it can also be a lot of fun, but it also accounts for about half of the gameplay you will experience. The other half of the game consists of about 40% platforming; jumping, swinging and climbing through the environments, while the remaining 10% is puzzle solving. I would have liked to see the puzzle solving element vastly expanded. The puzzles that were featured in the game seemed pretty simplistic. So, while the gunplay is lackluster, it's shortcomings wouldn't be so noticeable if there just wasn't so much of it. Uncharted does so many things right that the things that aren't quite up to snuff stick out like a sore thumb.So, should you play Uncharted: Drake's Fortune?
Well, if you've ever played a Tomb Raider game, or enjoyed an Indiana Jones film, then yes, absolutely. The game has the old-time adventure vibe similar to films like Indiana Jones or Romancing the Stone, while being more realistic and believable than a Tomb Raider adventure.
Completionists may be inclined to play it all the way to the end. Just be advised that some of the final chapters take an extremely creepy survival-horror tone. I wish that Naughty Dog (the game's developer) hadn't felt the need to follow the footsteps of games like Tomb Raider and include a supernatural element. The characters and villains established early on in the game were enough to make for a compelling ending to the game, although I understand the desire to ratchet up the tension by including a new scary "element".
Trophy-hunters should be aware that hunting for the hidden treasures (little items you pick up in random locations throughout the game) should be done with a guide. You can find quite a few without the guide, but you will need help for the harder items. Luckily after beating the game you can go back through each chapter in a level select mode to find missed treasures. Another series of trophies are contingent on beating the game on the hardest difficulty setting, but I wouldn't wish this on my worst enemy. The game's difficulty is already borderline frustrating on the 'easy' setting. There's a reason why the game's hardest difficulty level is called 'Crushing'.
Playing casually, on the easiest difficulty (I started on Normal, but switched after a couple chapters) yielded 24 trophies for me, which is about 40% of the number available.
In the end, Uncharted: Drake's Fortune is definitely worth some of your time. I would suggest renting it, borrowing it or getting it for cheap and play at least until somewhere between Chapter 5 and Chapter 8. At that point, you will have seen most of the great things the game has to offer. All of the major characters are introduced within the first couple chapters (some of these characters will be making a return in the sequel) and the plot, while well executed, is not overly complex, so you don't need to worry about being lost in Uncharted 2 if you've played through a bit of the original. Enjoy the spectacle that is Uncharted: Drake's Fortune, but don't stay too long. And remember that most of the shortcomings of the 1st game have been addressed in the sequel.- Posted Oct 27, 2009 7:51 pm PT
- 0 Comments
-
19Dec 08
Changing My Game
Because of this error:
- You have encountered a forbidden .html error, and have may used one or more of the forbidden words while trying to include a link in your message. There are certain words, including 'class' and 'style', that we do not allow while creating links in your messages because they are a doorway into several js exploits. Unfortunately, if you should have words that have 'class' in them (e.g., classify, classic, etc), they will also be forbidden. We are looking to find the best solution for this problem, and we apologize for any inconvenience this may cause.
You'll have to go over to GiantBomb to read this entry. I've tried to play nice with Gamespot's WYSIWYG editor and I have given up. Copying and pasting plain text from TextEdit should not generate this kind of garbage.
- Posted Dec 19, 2008 1:27 pm PT
- Category: Games
- 1 Comment
-
11Jun 08
Too Little Too Late
This is like a WAP site from 2004. I have been waiting for mobile version of GameSpot since I got my first cell phone with a color screen about 4 years ago, and after all that time, this is really disappointing.
Automatic browser detection doesn't work. You have to manually change the URL. Other than that it's almost all text, which is fine, I guess it makes for faster load times on a slow cell network, but who are we kidding? With the proliferation of 3G, there's almost no such thing anymore! I'm running an iPhone on the Edge network (widely maligned for it's slow speeds) and I can still get Gamespot.com (the full version) to load in a little over a minute and a half and that is a huge, bloated, php driven site with all kinds of superfluous flash and other garbage.
I'm comparing Gamespot Mobile to other mobile sites like Youtube and Facebook and Google Reader. These are rich, attractive mobile websites that still load quickly even on a slow Edge connection. I suppose if you're still using GPRS, it's probably pretty slow, but if you're still using GPRS at this point, it's time to upgrade anyway.
In the meantime, I suppose this new mobile site is better than nothing, but with the infinite resources of CNET and now CBS (and whoever owns CBS) at their disposal, I really thought that when Gamespot did a mobile site they would put out one that put all the rest to shame.
Oh well.
- Posted Jun 11, 2008 9:02 am PT
- 0 Comments
My Recent Reviews
-
X-Men Origins: Wolverine
"Surprisingly good" Wolverine finally in all his blood-soaked glory. Continue »
- Posted Nov 24, 2009 8:08 pm PT
- Recommended by 2 of 2 users.
-
Harry Potter and the Half-Blood Prince
"Almost, but not quite" Not bad, but suffers from a self-inflicted Catch-22. Continue »
- Posted Sep 8, 2009 8:30 am PT
ahren's Feed
-
Dec 8, 2009 7:28 am PTahren added Transformers: Revenge of the Fallen to their now playing list
-
Nov 30, 2009 8:10 am PTahren added Call of Duty 4: Modern Warfare to their now playing list
-
Nov 25, 2009 8:50 am PTahren added LittleBigPlanet to their now playing list
-
Nov 25, 2009 8:50 am PTahren added Rolando to their owned game list
-
Nov 25, 2009 8:50 am PTahren added Rolando to their now playing list
-
Nov 24, 2009 8:08 pm PTahren reviewed X-Men Origins: Wolverine and gave it a score of 7.5
-
Nov 9, 2009 7:13 pm PTahren added Hero of Sparta to their owned game list
-
Nov 9, 2009 7:13 pm PTahren added Hero of Sparta to their now playing list
-
Nov 9, 2009 7:12 pm PTahren added X-Men Origins: Wolverine to their now playing list
-
Oct 27, 2009 7:51 pm PTahren posted a new blog entry entitled Should You Discover Uncharted?
Tracked Blogs
Online IDs
PS3 ID
Ono-Sendai-7
My Unions
-
-
- Level: 5
- Leader: ArchieGates (Send PM)
- Number of members: 607
- My rank: Recruit
- ahren joined on: Mar 16, 2005




