• 19Aug 06

  Is Blue Ray really important?

  Why are Sony fans so amped about Blue Ray? I can see disc space but when did disc space become an issue? Developers hardly use the space availible now, so why have it?It just seems like to me that Sony is trying to force another media onto their gamers. Blue Ray is a new technology as most know, but why dont they just use it for a later system? How many gamers that are non-hardcore Sony fans will buy a $599.99 console that dont care about the DVD playback feature? I know they're using it for their games, but it just seems petty to buy a game system with all these extra features that not everyone will use. But what if Blue Ray flops like Betamax and UMD's, then the whole Blue Ray DVD player would be useless, well not completly to the ones that bought the movies. But i won't be buying a PS3 for a very long time and won't judge the ones that will.
  • Posted Aug 19, 2006 10:41 am PT
  • Category:
  • 0 Comments
  • Tag
  • Print
  • Email
  • Facebook
  • Digg
• 2May 06

  Whats in a Name?

  Why does a name matter? A name matters to some as a symbolic gesture for an item. But what does a name have to do with a game console? I've heard countless put down from people about the Revolution/Wii, its obvious that a name is more important than the console it self. So they call it the Wii, does it take away from the fact that the system will be awesome? No, its just a name. But leave it up to a bunch of immature kids to come up with potty humor with it. But why do people pass on the Xbox or PS2 just because its by a company they don't like? I mean if the console is good wouldnt you buy for that reason and not because of the name? I dont like Sony but i have a PS1, PS2 and a PSP (im not proud of the PSP) but i still have them because i like some of the games thats exclusive to it. But i like all game systems. There will be alot of people that wont buy a Revolution/Wii because of the Wii name, and i think its wrong to pass on it just for the name. But thats just me.

  • Posted May 2, 2006 10:58 pm PT
  • Category:
  • 0 Comments
  • Tag
  • Print
  • Email
  • Facebook
  • Digg
• 31Mar 06

  are graphics most important?

  Why is it that most of the gamers nowadays seem to be so up on graphics more than any other aspect in the gaming world? It seems like you cant make a good game unless you have amazingly great graphics. Ive heard alot of people  trash the revolutions graphics because they arent up to that of the ps3 or 360. I mean who cares what the game looks like if its great in every other way? Do you want an incredible looking game, but sucks in game play? I dont. I dont care what a game looks like as long as its good. I know everyone is entitled to their own opinions, but when they make the same old boring statements about the same thing over and over again, it gets tiresome. But some people dont want to hear the true things, The revolution will come with or have a shell controller and/or a standard controller availible. The xbox 360 has great graphics, but still isnt a huge deference. The ps3 doesnt work and will probally be delayed again until late 2007. Graphics arent everything in a game
  • Posted Mar 31, 2006 7:14 pm PT
  • Category:
  • 1 Comment
  • Tag
  • Print
  • Email
  • Facebook
  • Digg

See Previous Blog Posts