I just sometimes can´t understand how they could give such a grade to a game....

The ten for GTA IV for example..... You can only give a ten for a flawless and perfect game, and still then you´ve to consider if you just shouldn´t give it a 9.0 or 9.5..... The hype around GTA IV was huge and the reviewer planned to give it a ten even before he started the game, mayby he realises that, mayby not.... The game was good, really... But a 10?! I´ve heard for plenty of people that saints row was better and I can believe that completely....

An other example is Age of Empires: mythologies.... a 8.5!!!!! The reviewer obviously didn´t played the previous version neither does he like games with a difficulty.... I could understand if he gave it a 7.0 or something even though I´d give it a 5.5... but an 8.5!!!! I begin doubting more and more about the Gamespot Reviewers and how neutral they look at a game before they test it......