Outdated console exclusitivity

#1 Posted by rza_beats (3 posts) -
Enough with console exclusive games! Its so late in the life of these consoles that it feels unfair at this point to just release a game for the PS3 or xbox360. Share the wealth! im a huge fan of zombie games and this game honestly looks like it could be on the 360 no problemo!
#2 Posted by Zeronz112 (1 posts) -
thats the whole point. if all games were on all consoles there would be no point for multiple consoles, there would be One top one and the rest would fall behind. With this it gives reason for people to still buy a ps3. Xbox has halo. PS3 has MGS4, Uncharted, God of war, and now this. :)
#3 Posted by adamg78 (636 posts) -

thats why ps3 is better alot more better exclusive games come out what does xbox have like gears of war and halo while ps3 has a hand full of exclusives   that  are much better.  what can I say im proud to be a ps3 fan boy

#4 Posted by Hortey (1366 posts) -

Check out State of Decay by undead labs then.  It's an open world zombie survival sim type game coming to XBLA only and it should be out within the next month.

#5 Posted by xiaoyangguang (3 posts) -

Or maybe you could stop being so cheap and buy a ps3 too. This is not your choice to make, they work with Sony and not Microsoft so deal with it. Hardly unfair, has nothing to do with specs.

 

Enough with console exclusive games! Its so late in the life of these consoles that it feels unfair at this point to just release a game for the PS3 or xbox360. Share the wealth! im a huge fan of zombie games and this game honestly looks like it could be on the 360 no problemo! rza_beats

#6 Posted by murph85 (211 posts) -

Enough with console exclusive games! Its so late in the life of these consoles that it feels unfair at this point to just release a game for the PS3 or xbox360. Share the wealth! im a huge fan of zombie games and this game honestly looks like it could be on the 360 no problemo! rza_beats

Naughty Dog is a subsidiary of Sony so of course anything they develop is going to be a PS exclusive.

#7 Posted by CR00K (2644 posts) -
Hmm...you don't seem to understand how the industry works.
#8 Posted by EminentFate (682 posts) -

Exclusivity is good. The industry strives to contantly outdo each other that way, thus ending up w/ quality games all around.

Besides, Naughty Dog is a subsidiary of Sony--meaning that they'll only develop PS exclusives.

#9 Posted by d_e_e_p (12 posts) -
Sony has always produced AAA exclusives start from 2006 and still after 7 years there are exclusives for the PS3 . there is still beyond two souls coming for ps3 only .
#10 Posted by kiramasaki (757 posts) -

Yea fate and the other guy are spot on, Naughty Dog is a Sony owned company, why in the hell would they release a game on the xbox.

 

Also the ps3 is now cheap enough that if you won't buy it now you probably never will.

 

And then give us Halo on the ps3, and I'd have no problem with last of us on the xbox.

#11 Posted by everson_rm (768 posts) -

It could be in 360... spamming 4 or 5 discs!

#12 Posted by BlazeKingz (502 posts) -

1. naughty dog is financed by sony like halo is financed by microsoft.

2. Naughty dog is always trying to push the limits of the ps3 with its games since the games are specially made for 1 system. If the game ever got ported the quality would have to be lowered or the game would have 5 cd's since 360 doesnt even have a bluray tray.

3. if you look at the history of Sony you'll see that the ps3 console will still have games released after ps4 comes out. So why should they give up one of the main ps3 features "the exclusive's" now?

#13 Posted by aSchizophrenic (165 posts) -

Or maybe you could stop being so cheap and buy a ps3 too. This is not your choice to make, they work with Sony and not Microsoft so deal with it. Hardly unfair, has nothing to do with specs.

xiaoyangguang

 

Not everyone can afford to drop a couple hundred dollars on a new system, some of us have bills to pay.

#14 Posted by ForceofNature9 (4 posts) -

If you're worried about "bills to pay" to the point that you can't properly support your video game hobby, then you have more important things to concern your self with than whining about console exclusivity I.e. if you chose to only get a 360 instead of PS3, it's your own fault and you stick with the consequences if you can't afford both consoles. Sony has no reason to release the Last of Us on the 360 or WiiU.

#15 Posted by NbAlIvEr10000 (195 posts) -

To be honest....there is no way the 360 could handle this game... Not at the framerate the PS3 puts out.  I'm about 10hrs into the game and can say that with confidence.