Forums
›
The Elder Scrolls V: Skyrim Forum
›
The Elder Scrolls V: Skyrim Xbox 360 Forum
›
If Jarl Balgruuf initiated the rebellion ...
If Jarl Balgruuf initiated the rebellion, how would you feel about it?
This topic is now read-only on GameSpot.
To post new messages, please visit GameFAQs and log in using the same email and password that you use on GameSpot.
- Nov 18, 2012 12:26 am GMTR41NB0W-D45H posted...
Ajd_King posted...
And as I've explained before, I don't even particularly care for Obsidian. There are two members of their developer team that I believe to be responsible for the only game they've made I liked.
So no, you're wrong. Again.
http://www.gamefaqs.com/boards/615803-the-elder-scrolls-v-skyrim/64422436
Your post is somewhere on the first page.
Summarised: "Bethesda wouldn't let Obsidian touch their baby because they're afraid they'd do it better."
And? I believe Bethesda would use that reasoning. Why else do you believe they have yet to let any company do an ES spin off when they're allowing companies to do FO spin offs? They want to remain the uncontested masthead for the ES series.
That doesn't mean even take into account my feelings on the better company.
---
Walt's a scientist, scientists love lasers. - Nov 18, 2012 12:25 am GMTjosnkae132 posted...
You say these "different meanings" as if they were on opposite poles and not actually you know RIGHT NEXT TO EACH OTHER? Exactly how many cities do you think Tullius could have before he actually starts losing this thing?
That's not my intent. All I'm trying to say here is that the war could have ended without Whiterun being involved, hence it is not essential.
---
Walt's a scientist, scientists love lasers. - Nov 18, 2012 12:25 am GMTOh yeah, again, it was totally foolish, stupid, or inept to take the advice of a steward who was advising the king for God knows how long, since she's brand-new at this ruling thing. Totally.
---
Look, for the last time: Kirby has explained it over and over!
http://i279.photobucket.com/albums/kk138/Schesparn/11911255317531.gif - Nov 18, 2012 12:26 am GMTjosnkae132 posted...
yes I know, I feel the same, I've said it before, and I'll say it again, Ulfric is a HORRIBLE political leader.
Actually, he's a very good politician. For a Nord. Look at his designs from the perspective of ambition.
He has his sights set on the position of High King, which means removing Torygg. So he does it in such a way as to call back to one ancient Nordic tradition (not most of the others, but selective historical memory is a good strategy). He incites flames of religious dissent regarding Talos worship, using the Empire's own propaganda regarding Hjalti's history against them (he doesn't know it's propaganda, perhaps, but he'll use it all the same). If you're going through the Stormcloak questline, he'll get the crown, too, since all the Jarls are his toadies by the end of the rebellion. He's all about the spectacle, the imagery, the song of a great leader rising to overthrow perceived tyranny with even the mighty Dragonborn as his right hand (you won the war for him, but he's the one in charge, giving you the orders). He's about the poignant end, the glorious last stand.
"Let the Dragonborn do it. It will make a better song. "
"This moment will be immortalised in song."
"You wish to be left out of the speech? Very well, though it casts gloom on my glorious day."
"When the elves seek to rule the world, the Nords of Skyrim will lead the charge or die trying."
"We'll wait for the Moot to name me High King. It'll be better for all that way, but that doesn't mean I won't start acting like it."
"I can't afford to appear weak."
"I don't need you to teach me how to play high politics in Skyrim."
It's excellent imagery and also shows incredible political cunning (particularly by obtaining the Jagged Crown as a symbol) on Ulfric's part. He's not a fool by any stretch of the imagination, and anybody who thinks him to be one is letting themselves be suckered. He knows exactly what he's doing as far as politics are concerned with relation to Skyrim.
This isn't to call him outright bad, mind you. Ulfric sees himself as a glorious hero of old, one who will have songs written about him (it's very egocentric, but that's to be expected). He wants to be either the storied champion or grand martyr, one who will be remembered throughout all of history. He doesn't care who else goes down, as long as it's glorious. That's why he wants the Dragonborn to do the deed at the end of the Imperial questline. It would make a better song. And he has his moments where you can't help but respect him, such as when he's speaking about Arngeir. Or, in Sovngarde, when he recognises his folly and what his rebellion was costing on a scale far greater than his personal hopes, dreams and goals.
---
"We get serious about fictional girl underpants, and kid around when it comes to topics like world hunger." ~Teepo on CAGN - Nov 18, 2012 12:29 am GMTAjd_King posted...
josnkae132 posted...
You say these "different meanings" as if they were on opposite poles and not actually you know RIGHT NEXT TO EACH OTHER? Exactly how many cities do you think Tullius could have before he actually starts losing this thing?
That's not my intent. All I'm trying to say here is that the war could have ended without Whiterun being involved, hence it is not essential.
please answer the second question
---
which is better to be born good or to overcome your evil nature through effort? - Nov 18, 2012 12:29 am GMTAjd_King posted...
And? I believe Bethesda would use that reasoning. Why else do you believe they have yet to let any company do an ES spin off when they're allowing companies to do FO spin offs? They want to remain the uncontested masthead for the ES series.
Or because The Elder Scrolls is theirs, and not simply another franchise that they bought on a whim? Yeah, it's totally because they're afraid that their dev team would be put to shame, despite their Fallout winning Game of the Year, along with their last three Elder Scrolls games, by some other company that was only able to make a decent game by borrowing resources that Bethesda had already made, and throwing ideas from a game that they'd already finished into the mix.
---
My name is Dixie... Dixie Normous. - Nov 18, 2012 12:31 am GMTjosnkae132 posted...
Ajd_King posted...
josnkae132 posted...
You say these "different meanings" as if they were on opposite poles and not actually you know RIGHT NEXT TO EACH OTHER? Exactly how many cities do you think Tullius could have before he actually starts losing this thing?
That's not my intent. All I'm trying to say here is that the war could have ended without Whiterun being involved, hence it is not essential.
please answer the second question
Why? You seem to want a debate about Tullius, and seem to think I think he's "omnipotent", when the only point I'm trying to get across is the part you quoted. Taking cities by smashing them with an army is not the only scenario in which the war could be ended.
---
Walt's a scientist, scientists love lasers. - Nov 18, 2012 12:32 am GMTSchesparn posted...
Oh yeah, again, it was totally foolish, stupid, or inept to take the advice of a steward who was advising the king for God knows how long, since she's brand-new at this ruling thing. Totally.
She wouldn't have needed the advice if she wasn't foolish, stupid and inept in the first place. Good gawd, put down the bong and give your brain cells some time to breathe.
---
My name is Dixie... Dixie Normous. - Nov 18, 2012 12:35 am GMTR41NB0W-D45H posted...
Ajd_King posted...
And? I believe Bethesda would use that reasoning. Why else do you believe they have yet to let any company do an ES spin off when they're allowing companies to do FO spin offs? They want to remain the uncontested masthead for the ES series.
Or because The Elder Scrolls is theirs, and not simply another franchise that they bought on a whim? Yeah, it's totally because they're afraid that their dev team would be put to shame, despite their Fallout winning Game of the Year, along with their last three Elder Scrolls games, by some other company that was only able to make a decent game by borrowing resources that Bethesda had already made, and throwing ideas from a game that they'd already finished into the mix.
A: That's a possibility.
B: Game of the Year is a hollow title, but whatever.
C: I never said that Bethesda thinks they'd be "put to shame", only that it'd be in their best interest to be the only ones doing ES games.
---
Walt's a scientist, scientists love lasers. - Nov 18, 2012 12:35 am GMTIf all you can do is condescend without providing any real substance to your statements, then this is pointless. :\
---
Look, for the last time: Kirby has explained it over and over!
http://i279.photobucket.com/albums/kk138/Schesparn/11911255317531.gif - Nov 18, 2012 12:38 am GMTAjd_King posted...
A: That's a possibility.
B: Game of the Year is a hollow title, but whatever.
C: I never said they that Bethesda thinks they'd be "put to shame", only that it'd be in their best interest to be the only ones doing ES games.
Have I ever told you how pointless I think you are? As a human being, I mean.
---
My name is Dixie... Dixie Normous. - Nov 18, 2012 12:38 am GMTR41NB0W-D45H posted...
Ajd_King posted...
A: That's a possibility.
B: Game of the Year is a hollow title, but whatever.
C: I never said they that Bethesda thinks they'd be "put to shame", only that it'd be in their best interest to be the only ones doing ES games.
Have I ever told you how pointless I think you are? As a human being, I mean.
Yeah, you did. In that topic you linked. Which got you modded. Lol.
---
Walt's a scientist, scientists love lasers. - Nov 18, 2012 12:39 am GMTR41NB0W-D45H posted...
Ajd_King posted...
A: That's a possibility.
B: Game of the Year is a hollow title, but whatever.
C: I never said they that Bethesda thinks they'd be "put to shame", only that it'd be in their best interest to be the only ones doing ES games.
Have I ever told you how pointless I think you are? As a human being, I mean.
Aren't you literally the guy who was posting about how anyone who says they feel sorry for someone killing themselves when they dont know that person is lying/dishonest and stuff to that effect?
Because lol.
---
Stand in the ashes of a trillion dead souls, and ask the ghosts if honor matters. The silence is your answer. http://i.imgur.com/VZeCB.gif--------------------------------------------------------------------------
I don't really like GS; this is just my alt. Alt account brought to you by Rebel.
Tis the times plague when madmen lead the blind.
- Nov 18, 2012 12:41 am GMTSchesparn posted...
If all you can do is condescend without providing any real substance to your statements, then this is pointless. :\
She doesn't know how to manage an army. She doesn't know how to run a city. She's brand-new, as you said it, at politics. Yet she thinks she should be the High F***ing Queen of Skyrim. She even thinks that she's fit to be the Jarl of a single hold.
No, that's not foolish. That's not stupid. And she's sure as hell not inept at what she's chosen to do.
Do us all a favor. Put down the bong.
---
My name is Dixie... Dixie Normous. - Nov 18, 2012 12:46 am GMTRebelElite791 posted...
Aren't you literally the guy who was posting about how anyone who says they feel sorry for someone killing themselves when they dont know that person is lying/dishonest and stuff to that effect?
Because lol.
Aren't you literally the guy named RebelElite that isn't a rebel in any way, shape or form, and openly chooses to side with the people opposing the rebels, even going so far as to call the rebels stupid on occasion?
Because lol.
Also, I could barely understand what the f*** you said.
---
My name is Dixie... Dixie Normous. - Nov 18, 2012 12:45 am GMTShe didn't choose these roles. They were thrust upon her when her husband was murdered. She's making the best of her situation, by using the assets at her disposal.
Not backing down from responsibility everyone expects her to take upon herself, yet making the best choices possible by using the knowledge of the more experienced. Total bimbo.
And with that, I'm done, since you apparently can't hold up one half of a civil conversation.
---
Look, for the last time: Kirby has explained it over and over!
http://i279.photobucket.com/albums/kk138/Schesparn/11911255317531.gif - Nov 18, 2012 12:46 am GMTR41NB0W-D45H posted...
RebelElite791 posted...
Aren't you literally the guy who was posting about how anyone who says they feel sorry for someone killing themselves when they dont know that person is lying/dishonest and stuff to that effect?
Because lol.
Aren't you the guy named RebelElite that isn't a rebel in any way, shape or form, and openly chooses to side with the people opposing the rebels, even going so far as to call the rebels stupid on occasion?
Because lol.
Also, I could barely understand what the f*** you said.
Wat.
Rebel Elite = Arbiter from Halo. Yes it's a terrible name.
You're saying he's a useless person, yet you openly express scorn for basic empathy and human compassion. (thus you are the one who's really "useless" to our species' progress).
---
Stand in the ashes of a trillion dead souls, and ask the ghosts if honor matters. The silence is your answer. http://i.imgur.com/VZeCB.gif--------------------------------------------------------------------------
I don't really like GS; this is just my alt. Alt account brought to you by Rebel.
Tis the times plague when madmen lead the blind.
- Nov 18, 2012 12:48 am GMTSchesparn posted...
She didn't choose these roles. They were thrust upon her when her husband was murdered. She's making the best of her situation, by using the assets at her disposal.
Not backing down from responsibility everyone expects her to take upon herself, yet making the best choices possible by using the knowledge of the more experienced. Total bimbo.
And with that, I'm done, since you apparently can't hold up one half of a civil conversation.
Good, you were getting annoying, anyway.
---
My name is Dixie... Dixie Normous. - Nov 18, 2012 12:50 am GMTWell, I made my point. You failed to make yours. There's little else to discuss.

---
Look, for the last time: Kirby has explained it over and over!
http://i279.photobucket.com/albums/kk138/Schesparn/11911255317531.gif - Nov 18, 2012 1:00 am GMTWooo hoo hoo hoo, can you feel tension? I can. I can feel it down in my plums. They're gettin a nice bluish hue. Gettin ready to take em to the farmers market.
---
"Girl, you smell good. Did you take a bath in rainbows and cupcakes?"
Forums
›
The Elder Scrolls V: Skyrim Forum
›
The Elder Scrolls V: Skyrim Xbox 360 Forum
›
If Jarl Balgruuf initiated the rebellion ...
The Elder Scrolls V: Skyrim
Not Following
- Publisher(s): Bethesda Softworks
- Developer(s): Bethesda Game Studios
- Genre: Role-Playing
- Release:
- ESRB: M
Game Stats
- Game Universe:
- The Elder Scrolls III: Morrowind (XBOX, PC),
- The Elder Scrolls IV: Oblivion (PC, X360, MOBILE, PS3, PSP),
- The Elder Scrolls IV: Knights of the Nine (PC, X360),
- The Elder Scrolls IV: Shivering Isles (PC, X360, PS3),
- The Elder Scrolls IV: Oblivion - Game of the Year Edition (X360, PC, PS3),
- BioShock & The Elder Scrolls IV: Oblivion Bundle (PC, X360),
- The Elder Scrolls IV: Oblivion - Mehrunes' Razor (PC, X360),
- The Elder Scrolls IV: Oblivion - The Fighter's Stronghold (PC, X360),
- The Elder Scrolls IV: Oblivion - The Orrery (PC, X360),
- The Elder Scrolls IV: Oblivion - The Vile Lair (PC, X360)
- M Rating Description
Titles rated M (Mature) have content that may be suitable for persons ages 17 and older. Learn more
Elder Scrolls V: Skyrim Navigation
Games You May Like


Redguard (PC)
Morrowind (XBOX)
Dishonored (X360)
Game of Thrones (X360)
Saints Row IV (X360)
Users who looked at content for this game also looked at these games.


