Forums › The Elder Scrolls V: Skyrim Forum › The Elder Scrolls V: Skyrim Xbox 360 Forum › Have the Dragonborn leaks mentioned anyt ...

Have the Dragonborn leaks mentioned anything about Unarmed?

« prev next »

Page:

This topic is now read-only on GameSpot.
To post new messages, please visit GameFAQs and log in using the same email and password that you use on GameSpot.

ghosta2

Dec 5, 2012 12:07 am GMT
obishawn posted...
Phantom0708 posted...
Kenshiro class, do it NAO

WATATATATATATATATATA

But seriously, can't they make "gauntlet" weapons? Like the power fists from Fallout, except maybe just intricate armored gauntlets with magical properties.

You mean something different than the unarmed enchantment? Put the enchantment on a ring and pretend it is brass knuckles.

I have much more elaberate ideas for unarmed weapons.

Dwermer Power fist. Dwemer Centurions bowling ball fist attached to pistons attached to the gauntlet. Allows you to do the same bowlling ball piston punch that centurions used in Morrowind.

Dwemer ballistic fist
attach the dwemer Sphere centurian's pistol crossbow to your gauntlet
fires a crossbow bolt when it makes contact with an enemy

Auriel's Gauntlets
Punches have Fus Ro Dah power

Mead opener
Gauntlets with giant 6in spikes attached, ignores armor

Paladin toaster
Enchanted gauntlet that does shock damage

Hidden blades
deal large amounts of sneak attack damage and are silent

Scissor hands
gauntlets with blades attached to the finger tips

Bear trap fist

Werewolf claw gauntlet

Dragon claw gauntlet- made from the claws of a dragon
bonus damage to Dragons

The stinger- created from netch
causes poison and paralysis on strike

Marley's Bane
Giant chains are wrapped around the hands and wrists

Kataras- nuf said

boring stock weapons
brass and spiked knuckles
Cestus
boxing tape and gloves
mace gauntlet-giant mace head at the end of the gauntlet
Tenderizers- boxing gloves with nails attached
---
"What is better. To be born good or to overcome your evil nature through great effort." - Paarthurnax
Gt: Ghosta2
xDeadrebornx

Dec 5, 2012 12:08 am GMT
SandalFury posted...
This is delicious.

Ya if you like the taste of wall
---
It was close...real close.
StupidMofoz

Dec 5, 2012 12:18 am GMT
It's in the lore of the game series, monks are talked about in past elder scrolls games.

/endtopic

They fit in the elder scrolls no matter how much you say otherwise, since they've been there the whole time.
ST0N3W4LL

Dec 5, 2012 1:54 am GMT
@someclown911

On this thread, you have posted some of the most ridiculous things that I've ever seen on GameFAQS, and that is no easy feat. If I could award you a 10th degree BB in internet bravado, I would, because you are truly worthy. There are so many of your arguments that I want to dissect..

In one of your first posts on this thread, you essentially stated that a guy threatening you with a knife is no threat. First off, if you've never been in mortal peril(and I'm not assuming that you haven't), you don't know how you're going to react when you ARE in that sort of predicament. Claims like that are seriously an embarassment to martial arts.

You've also stated that if a guy can't touch you with his hands, he can't touch you with a knife. Let me as you a question: Why do you think range factors in to boxing/kickboxing so heavily? If you narrowly avoid a 71" jab, you can't honestly assume the same success when facing a 77" jab. If you make a mistake in anticipating where that blade will fall, you'll be stabbed.

Here's a good one: You claimed that if you could hit an object in the same spot, repeatedly, you could effectively simulate that experience against a live opponent. On your best day, maybe. That's basically saying, "If I train to hit the same spot on a heavy bag, 100/100 times, I'll automatically be able to hit a guy when sparring." ..Were you serious? Do you see how wrong that is, now? Aside from the obvious, "A bag or board isin't a living, breathing, thinking opponent." you don't even take into consideration your OWN movement when facing a moving opponent. How many people have you fought in your lifetime that just sit there and let you punch them? Unbelievable.

You claim that, when you're paying attention, you don't make mistakes. That equates to saying, "When I'm paying attention, I'm perfect." I mean, it does. Some of the BEST fighters in the WORLD make mistakes, even WHEN they're paying attention. Fedor Emelianenko--do you think he wasn't paying attention when he lost to Werdum? What about when Silva lost to Chonan? So..by saying that, "When I, the great someclown911 am paying attention, -I- don't make mistakes." you're saying that you're better than ELITE FIGHTERS WHO FIGHT FOR A LIVING, when they do occasionally make mistakes, when paying attention? That was the smack in the mouth, there. I don't even really need to continue, because you invalidated your own argument with that; and I wasn't even exaggerating. In comparison, "When I'm paying attention, I don't make mistakes." makes me nauseous.

I will continue, though. Everything that you're claiming basically revolves around the assumption that there aren't trained, dangerous, thuggish people out there. "Average guy, average guy, average guy.." Do you remember that? If you're training yourself and others in this, the year 2012, to fight average guys, you're setting both your students and yourself up for failure. With the explosion of martial arts/mixed martial arts, you are doing an extreme disservice to anyone who trains with you, by overestimating your own abilities, and underestimating those of everyone else. Take your philosophy/understanding of the martial arts and attempt to exercise it in the REAL world, in a place where it truly is life or death, and there is a good chance that you will be killed.

If you believe the stuff that you've said and continue to train others to believe it, please, reconsider. One day, you might have the death of someone you "trained" on your conscience.
ST0N3W4LL

Dec 5, 2012 3:03 am GMT
someclown911 posted...
"Knives can cut you if they are in the same place as you at the same time."

Remember how vicinity means taking up the same space as you? I don't remember that

Now you're just getting silly. You're claiming to have reached a state of perfection through a clarity of mind? What happened to admitting to your fallibility? If you don't make mistakes, then you're infallible, which you've admitted previously that you aren't. Does your clarity of mind apply to all aspects of your life? Do you go through life with nothing but flawlessly coordinated and perfectly executed actions? Because what you call "clarity of mind" is starting to sound a lot like a willful ignorance of your own shortcomings.

Can I make mistakes? Yes. Do I make them when I pay attention? No. Only through realizing my shortcomings in the first place did I even get to this point. Something that you and most of our race has failed to do. It's what separates the greats from peons such as yourself

The first time I was able to successfully think about nothing, yes, I could feel and get rid of excess body movements and my balance did drastically improve. I could appropriately read intentions. My memory recall improved. It was to the point that I was depressed for several months after the thrill wore off because life felt too easy

It is only "absurd" because you have never actual gotten your mind to shut up for two seconds

We've moved past the point of discussing hypotheticals and into the realm of absurdity. Everyone in every field will make a mistake, regardless of their state of mind. This is as simple of an objective truth as you can possibly accept.

Says you. But you're wrong, as usual. If you pay attention you do not make mistakes. Period. If you make a mistake that you normally would not make it is because you stopped paying attention. I am not telling you "clarity of mind" is something mystical. I am telling you that if you assume you will make mistakes you are already condemning yourself to make mistakes

If you are distracted, don't blame the distraction

Your alleged clarity of mind does not keep you from mistakes, it keeps you from recognizing them.

No, because again, a clear mind does not magically start making mistakes it normally would not make. And you can only get that voice of doubt out of your head by recognizing your mistakes and stopping your attempts to rationalize them in the first place

Speaking of which, you failed to properly contract "you're" in the above post. Please run your replies past a spell check, grammar check, and the crystalline, tranquil pools of your enlightened mind before posting.

That isn't a mistake. I do not care about grammar and only intend to communicate with you. The only times you even see me use apostrophes, my phone did it for me. However, because of my superior mind I can properly understand what you write, whereas you repeatedly fail to comprehend what I write

My third eye(lol) tells me that you are angry

I could easily make the same claim about you. And it would sound just as idiotic.

"The thing about smart mother f***ers is they sound like crazy mother f***ers to dumb mother f***ers"

When you see this quote reply, see above. ^^^

One last thing, Chuck Norris: If you're capable of "waxing off" someone's knife thrust and instantaneously disarming them, that person likely wasn't trying to kill you, anyways. *shakes head* You know..why bother. Even if you reply, this is the last communication that I can bear, based off of the outrageous statements you made, that I've pointed out. Please though, consider what I've said, and don't encourage your "disciplines" upon anyone else.
someclown911

Dec 5, 2012 3:03 am GMT
On this thread, you have posted some of the most ridiculous things that I've ever seen on GameFAQS, and that is no easy feat. If I could award you a 10th degree BB in internet bravado, I would, because you are truly worthy. There are so many of your arguments that I want to dissect..

Go for it

In one of your first posts on this thread, you essentially stated that a guy threatening you with a knife is no threat.

I can already tell this is going to be good by your lovely reading comprehension. Let me guess, just like the other guy, you're going to make a bunch of random assumptions, too

I said that a guy with a knife is not necessarily a threat

First off, if you've never been in mortal peril(and I'm not assuming that you haven't),

You must be psychic? Or is your petty reasoning "I don't want to believe someone has done something I could not do?"

you don't know how you're going to react when you ARE in that sort of predicament. Claims like that are seriously an embarassment to martial arts.

You people need to learn to stop throwing around the words martial arts like they mean something or that you even know anything about the subject besides s*** everyone knows that you regurgitate. It's just pretentious

You've also stated that if a guy can't touch you with his hands, he can't touch you with a knife. Let me as you a question: Why do you think range factors in to boxing/kickboxing so heavily? If you narrowly avoid a 71" jab, you can't honestly assume the same success when facing a 77" jab. If you make a mistake in anticipating where that blade will fall, you'll be stabbed.

Probably because kickboxing and boxing do not use any form of grappling? You're off to a good start. I can tell you know what you are talking about. And if you can prevent someone from touching you with their hands it means that their range does not matter because you are likely redirecting their arms so that the knife does not land... anywhere on your body

Here's a good one: You claimed that if you could hit an object in the same spot, repeatedly, you could effectively simulate that experience against a live opponent.

Another assumption on your part. I'm not making any assumptions. I know for a fact that I can do it, not "since I did this I can do that"

On your best day, maybe.

Every day
someclown911

Dec 5, 2012 3:05 am GMT
That's basically saying, "If I train to hit the same spot on a heavy bag, 100/100 times, I'll automatically be able to hit a guy when sparring."

100/100 that's like, exactly the same as 10/10. And heavy bag? That's like saying target but it will convince everyone of your expertise

Anyway, didn't say automatically. I guess you assumed that I punch slowly and telegraph it, when I can always put my fist where I want it to go and adapt at the last second because the punch is made up of two movements and the second movement is what actually causes the damage

..Were you serious? Do you see how wrong that is, now?

Lol... Yes I was, no I don't. If the point you were trying to make wasn't obvious, I doubt that your Neanderthal explanation would have helped me understand

Aside from the obvious, "A bag or board isin't a living, breathing, thinking opponent." you don't even take into consideration your OWN movement when facing a moving opponent. How many people have you fought in your lifetime that just sit there and let you punch them? Unbelievable.

Having already responded to this twice, I can't help but laugh at how long you go on about the same thing. "If you can't say something simply you don't understand it well enough"

something about lol UFC

I'm convinced. You know everything about fighting. Obviously, you do not understand what it means to actually pay attention. Not everything is black and white. You can mostly be paying attention and still become distracted by thoughts of what to do next. When I say pay attention I mean pay all the way attention

assumption that there aren't trained, dangerous, thuggish people out there. "Average guy, average guy, average guy.." blah blah blah take your philosophy/understanding of the martial arts and attempt to exercise it in the REAL world, in a place where it truly is life or death, and there is a good chance that you will be killed.

You're the one making assumptions, you cannot read properly, already did, already didn't. As for average guy, he'd probably eat you for breakfast and I would eat him for breakfast

If you believe the stuff that you've said and continue to train others to believe it, please, reconsider. One day, you might have the death of someone you "trained" on your conscience.

Someone I trained would A, actually know how to fight and B, actually know when they can win a fight. I did not say "don't run", I said "sometimes you can't run". I did not say "all people with knives are not a threat," I said "someone with a knife is not necessarily a threat

I highly suggest you put down the gloves and pick up some reading glasses. I feel like you're a little too clueless
ZozmaSage

Dec 5, 2012 3:14 am GMT
Remember how vicinity means taking up the same space as you? I don't remember that"

So th real point you're trying to make is "a knife can't stab me if it can't stab me.

Can I make mistakes? Yes. Do I make them when I pay attention? No. Only through realizing my shortcomings in the first place did I even get to this point. Something that you and most of our race has failed to do. It's what separates the greats from peons such as yourself ....It is only "absurd" because you have never actual gotten your mind to shut up for two seconds

Do me a favor. Spar with someone. At this point I'm not convinced you've even done that much, but try it out now. Video tape it. As many times you want from as many angles you want. Send it to fighters you think are on the same level as you. They'll point out mistakes.

No, because again, a clear mind does not magically start making mistakes it normally would not make. And you can only get that voice of doubt out of your head by recognizing your mistakes and stopping your attempts to rationalize them in the first place

"I'm fallible" is a "rationalization" most of us accept come to terms with in our childhood.

That isn't a mistake. I do not care about grammar and only intend to communicate with you.

It's not a mistake since you don't care about it? Do I need to crack open a dictionary and show you the definition of "mistake?" Because it does not necessitate caring about something. Or is a dictionary not a valid enough source for you?

The only times you even see me use apostrophes, my phone did it for me. However, because of my superior mind I can properly understand what you write, whereas you repeatedly fail to comprehend what I write

In my defense, it's difficult to understand what someone's saying when they have no base in reality.

So I repeated my point. A punch that knocks you out is just as dangerous. "A punch doesn't always" is such a broad statement. One punch can always knock you out. Another punch may never knock you out. You may have to know more about anatomy to successfully knock someone out than just stabbing indiscriminately, but to the person who knows how it's literally the same concept

That right there? Another reason why an untrained opponent with a knife is more dangerous than an unarmed opponent.

You do not know the validity of the source in, say, present company. You can see that I generally know what I'm talking about, even if you have to nitpick to disagree. Suddenly I tell you something that you just will not accept. It's called thinking clearly. Or not getting distracted. You are proving that you have never actually gotten the voice in your head to shut up by questioning it's validity rather than at least taking it with a grain of salt. It is why you still suck(relatively of course

What you're talking about sounds, to me, to be a juvenile understanding of the concept of focus. To block everything out of your mind and live in the present moment. I've focused. Any fighter who fights long enough learns to do it whether they know it or not. No rational person would say it's a panacea for mistakes. You're the only one that naive.

Not likely, and I think you're probably making more assumptions based on your poor reading skills

Talking to someone who doesn't care about grammar makes it hard to understand.
someclown911

Dec 5, 2012 3:14 am GMT
One last thing, Chuck Norris:

Okay clown, be nice. He's just a child. Otherwise he'd have a more lengthy list of references. Chuck Norris...

If you're capable of "waxing off" someone's knife thrust and instantaneously disarming them, that person likely wasn't trying to kill you, anyways.

Lol? How do you figure? They stab, you defect, wrist control, pinky up. Easy one handed movement, waxing motion puts hand already behind blade. Body moves to avoid being stabbed upon deflecting. Plan A and B all in one go

*shakes head* You know..why bother. Even if you reply, this is the last communication that I can bear, based off of the outrageous statements you made, that I've pointed out. Please though, consider what I've said, and don't encourage your "disciplines" upon anyone else.

You mean you're running away because you know you are already losing a downhill argument?

"I'm going to convince you that this is outrageous by calling it outrageous!"

Genius. If only I knew it was this easy to persuade people
ZozmaSage

Dec 5, 2012 3:17 am GMT
Fear is natural. Panic is nurtural.

Because you said so? Because there's absolutely no definition of the world anywhere I can find that says panic is nurtural.

I have been saying the same thing since the get-go. You have been misreading it, crediting me with other people's posts, and nit picking so that you could sound smart since the very beginning. Suddenly you get to a point you can't refute and start throwing a hissy fit

But it's not clarity of mind. It's tantamount to masturbatory. You're doing nothing more than stroking your ego, and you're deceiving no one except yourself.

I've been thinking this about you since the beginning. It's funny how you begin to describe yourself to me when flustered. By the way, you are flustered. Neither martial artists nor people who can think calmly should be getting flustered

These are all projected qualities. Projection is when you deny aspects of yourself and put them on other people, in order to feel better about yourself. Which is what this whole conversation is about.

I'm not wrong. This is a case of you misreading something because you expected me to spoon feed you every little detail. All forms of martial arts, from a physical standpoint, are anatomy and physics. Of course, not your fault. I should have specified.

You did specify. "ust told you that martial arts is anatomy and physics. All of it. "

Again, it's really simple. You are just guilty of panicked thinking. It's okay, it only means that you are a coward. Don't repress. Accept and move on

When one self-proclaimed fighter calls another fighter a coward, you know they've hit the rock bottom of their reasoning. It's our version of Godwin's law.
someclown911

Dec 5, 2012 4:13 am GMT
So th real point you're trying to make is "a knife can't stab me if it can't stab me.

No, "th" real point I'm trying to make is "a knife wielded by a person who is incapable of stabbing me cant stab me"

You're truly pathetic. How many times are you going to try to twist what I say? Do you think I will suddenly stop noticing?

Do me a favor. Spar with someone.

You may not understand this by now but I know that you are peon. Do you know how long ago I first sparred with someone? If you are bringing up sparring I can only imagine you to be around 13

Yes, people older than that spar. They also don't go around acting like big s*** because they had a fake fight

At this point I'm not convinced you've even done that much

That is because you are illiterate

Video tape it. As many times you want from as many angles you want. Send it to fighters you think are on the same level as you. They'll point out mistakes.

I'll do that when I'm in Asia

"I'm fallible" is a "rationalization" most of us accept come to terms with in our childhood.

I didn't say I as invincible. You just can't read. You have quite the imagination though

It's not a mistake since you don't care about it? Do I need to crack open a dictionary and show you the definition of "mistake?" Because it does not necessitate caring about something. Or is a dictionary not a valid enough source for you?

I'm wondering if you have asperger's or something.

I do not make mistakes when I pay attention

Is not the same as

I don't make mistakes if I don't care

In addition

Lol subjectivity

You really need to work on your comprehension. It's a wonder you've ever learned anything

In my defense, it's difficult to understand what someone's saying when they have no base in reality.

You're the one with no base in reality. You are a child who has an imagination of reality. When someone from reality tells you about reality you nit pick. Constantly. It does not make you look smart, it makes you look like you are desperate for the last word

That right there? Another reason why an untrained opponent with a knife is more dangerous than an unarmed opponent.

Stop responding just to say stuff. I have agreed from the beginning that a person with a knife is more dangerous than that same person without a knife

You seem to be in denial of the fact that someone can survive being assaulted with a knife. Because you can't do it. With an ego so big, no wonder you think "being able to concentrate" is an abstract concept

What you're talking about sounds, to me, to be a juvenile understanding of the concept of focus.

No, the juvenille understanding would consist of black and white. Like, your understanding

To block everything out of your mind and live in the present moment. I've focused. Any fighter who fights long enough learns to do it whether they know it or not. No rational person would say it's a panacea for mistakes. You're the only one that naive.

You focus, you become distracted, you make a mistake. I focus, I stay focused, I do not make a mistake. Case closed

Talking to someone who doesn't care about grammar makes it hard to understand.

Much like fighting anyone who has a knife makes it hard to win?

Your logic is atrocious. Keep trying to twist my words to feel like you had the last word. Just more embarrassment for you
someclown911

Dec 5, 2012 3:52 am GMT
Because you said so? Because there's absolutely no definition of the world anywhere I can find that says panic is nurtural.

Because looking something up is not the same as understanding it. You are just trying to argue. Which is why we're here. Look, I know you're lying about being a martial artist. I don't know who you're trying to prove it to but I don't think they care either

These are all projected qualities. Projection is when you deny aspects of yourself and put them on other people, in order to feel better about yourself. Which is what this whole conversation is about.

I'm not impressed. I've seen you regurgitate information at least fifty times

You did specify. "ust told you that martial arts is anatomy and physics. All of it. "

Quoting out of context. You've BSed before I see

When one self-proclaimed fighter calls another fighter a coward, you know they've hit the rock bottom of their reasoning. It's our version of Godwin's law.

When one self-proclaimed fighter talks about how he and all the other fighters in the world hang out and sip tea and make up rules, you know he is just trying to put on airs to look cool on the Internet

At the beginning I thought we could actually have a conversation. But now it's hard to even pretend you've cut the apron strings
Damiac

Dec 5, 2012 10:58 am GMT
someclown911 posted...
... made up stuff...

Dude, that's nothing. One time 20 gangsters were coming to kill... a person I knew. I punched the first one in the head so hard it flew off, and ricocheted around the room, knocking the heads off each one of the other 19 gangsters.

Admittedly, your story had better detail and was more interesting to read. But I suspect mine was just as true.

Anyway, even you admitted that you, armed with a knife, would be able to beat an unarmed version of you. Which was the original point you seemed to be arguing against. All other things being equal: weapon > no weapon.

Which is kind of the point of using unarmed in a game like this. So it'd be nice to have unarmed be more viable, even if it meant a slight disadvantage.

Also, I'll be 30 in June. Some child indeed...
---
The internet. Where men are men, women are men, and children are the FBI!
someclown911

Dec 5, 2012 11:38 am GMT
Dude, that's nothing. One time 20 gangsters were coming to kill... a person I knew. I punched the first one in the head so hard it flew off, and ricocheted around the room, knocking the heads off each one of the other 19 gangsters.

That sounds believable

Admittedly, your story had better detail and was more interesting to read. But I suspect mine was just as true.

That's because there are people in this world who can do things that you cannot, and attempting to play down these people only gives away that you are jealous of the attributes in these people

Anyway, even you admitted that you, armed with a knife, would be able to beat an unarmed version of you. Which was the original point you seemed to be arguing against. All other things being equal: weapon > no weapon.

That's if I don't have gauntlets. You know, like in ES

Which is kind of the point of using unarmed in a game like this. So it'd be nice to have unarmed be more viable, even if it meant a slight disadvantage.

Cool

Also, I'll be 30 in June. Some child indeed...

Thirty huh? So you have some kind of mental defect?
Damiac

Dec 5, 2012 12:10 pm GMT
Well, at least one obvious mental defect, in that I continue this discussion with you. So something's clearly wrong with me. But I can't help myself, for some reason you're quite entertaining to me.

I agree with one thing, a person with a weapon does not just automatically win. And you might as well attempt to defend yourself (or others), if there's no better alternative.

But I think you're full of it. Your story, while a good example of creative writing, is BS. I'm sure there are people out there who could manage to beat an armed assailant of average ability. I'm sure you're not one of those people. Your cockiness and bravado shows you are just a very successful troll. So well done.

100/100 that's like, exactly the same as 10/10.

Sure.... and the same as 1/1. So if you hit a 'target' once, you could do it forever. Nice logic.

You started off well, but clearly got more frustrated as the topic went on, and revealed your trollish nature. Still, epically successful trolling. 10/10 would read again.
---
The internet. Where men are men, women are men, and children are the FBI!
someclown911

Dec 5, 2012 12:23 pm GMT
Well, at least one obvious mental defect, in that I continue this discussion with you. So something's clearly wrong with me. But I can't help myself, for some reason you're quite entertaining to me.

And in that you cannot form logical conclusions

I agree with one thing, a person with a weapon does not just automatically win. And you might as well attempt to defend yourself (or others), if there's no better alternative.

Cool

But I think you're full of it. Your story, while a good example of creative writing, is BS.

Says the guy with a mental defect

I'm sure there are people out there who could manage to beat an armed assailant of average ability.

I'm sure there are more than you think. You dont even have to be yip man

I'm sure you're not one of those people.

Normally I don't trust water heads to be sure of anything

Your cockiness and bravado shows you are just a very successful troll. So well done.

Naaah

Sure.... and the same as 1/1. So if you hit a 'target' once, you could do it forever. Nice logic.

Yeah, no s***. If I can hit a target once I can do it forever. Do you lack the reliability to punch the same spot over and over? But you doubt that someone could possibly be superior to you?

You started off well, but clearly got more frustrated as the topic went on, and revealed your trollish nature. Still, epically successful trolling. 10/10 would read again.

If you read all of that the first time you must have a plethora of mental defects
Damiac

Dec 5, 2012 1:09 pm GMT
Aww... that's it? You're just going to admit you were trolling and move on? That's lame.
Ah well, at least you got some insults in there. My poor waterhead is still reeling...

If you're going to troll, you gotta stick with it to the bitter end!
---
The internet. Where men are men, women are men, and children are the FBI!
someclown911

Dec 5, 2012 1:18 pm GMT
Damiac posted...
Aww... that's it? You're just going to admit you were trolling and move on? That's lame.
Ah well, at least you got some insults in there. My poor waterhead is still reeling...

If you're going to troll, you gotta stick with it to the bitter end!

Aww... that's it? You're just going to vie for the last word without even trying to say something remotely clever to convince yourself that you've done a good job of... well, whatever it is you were trying to accomplish?

I hope you don't take the insults to heart. I'm not trying to be mean, just completely objective
evildarkscot

Dec 5, 2012 3:30 pm GMT
Someclown you act like the best fighter your not you act like the most knowledable person your not you come across as the biggest troll you are
How about you tell us how your better then Bruce lee , the entire ufc fighters , every military and police force in the world , since you don't make mistakes
---
WARNING THIS POST MAY CONTAIN NO USAGE OF GRAMMAR
A government is a body of people; usually, notably ungoverned.
ZozmaSage

Dec 5, 2012 3:38 pm GMT
You may not understand this by now but I know that you are peon. Do you know how long ago I first sparred with someone? If you are bringing up sparring I can only imagine you to be around 13

Yes, people older than that spar. They also don't go around acting like big s*** because they had a fake fight

No one here's bragging about sparring. It's a basic part of the craft. It's a mock fight. No points, no rules, and ideally no protection. Practice. And practice is as essential to fighting as it is at everything. It doesn't translate to the street, but no one ever says it does.

But you've gotten me curious at this point; what relationship do you actually have with fighting? Are you attempting to be a professional? Have you already made a name for yourself? Do you go to a school? Or have a trainer? Have you been forced into a lot of fights? I don't recall you ever really specifying, beyond a story you let everyone know you don't make a claim to.

You treat study, research, teachers, and schools as if they're crutches for the inexperienced and unthinking. You frown on sparring. So where does this real world experience of fighting come from?

I didn't say I as invincible.
I didn't say that either. I said "fallible."
fal·li·ble (fl-bl) http://www.thefreedictionary.com/fallible
adj.
1. Capable of making an error:

No, "th" real point I'm trying to make is "a knife wielded by a person who is incapable of stabbing me cant stab me"
I do not make mistakes when I pay attention

No, the juvenille understanding would consist of black and white. Like, your understanding
You focus, you become distracted, you make a mistake. I focus, I stay focused, I do not make a mistake. Case closed

Then prove it to us. Please. And I'm not asking just to challenge you or make things difficult. I genuinely want to see a fighter who doesn't make mistakes. Because I've never met, seen, or heard a single other fighter who claimed, by nature or through voluntarily entering a state of mind, they will not make a mistake while concentrating. Hell, I've never met anyone over thirteen say that, period.

So give us some footage. Spar with someone. I know you feel it's beneath you, but it'll serve the purpose just fine. And if you're not comfortable exhibiting yourself, that's fine. Give us an example of another fighter who says he doesn't make mistakes while concentrating, and we'll analyze their footage. Or if, by some strange happening, no such fighter has ever been taped, give us something else--you like video games; how about a clean Godhand level Die playthrough? I really don't care what it is, because if it's absent of mistakes or alteration then we won't have room to be skeptical.
You're making the claim, so the burden of evidence is on you.

You really need to work on your comprehension. It's a wonder you've ever learned anything
I'm not the only person here who thinks you're making leaps of logic and expressing yourself poorly. Maybe we're not the problem. Just putting that out there.

Stop responding just to say stuff. I have agreed from the beginning that a person with a knife is more dangerous than that same person without a knife

"I said if that person cannot touch you with his hand he cannot touch you with a knife(well it would be a little easier but not that much)."
"If you have the hand eye coordination and reaction speed to prevent someone from touching you with their hands, that person will not put you in a situation where a knifes range means anything"