Sign on Options
Theme: [Light Selected] To Dark»

Star Trek The Video Game Review

loading...

Game Emblems

The Bad

  1. Too much ground battles and too little space battle, probably because the space portion is even less well thought..

Mark Walton
Posted by Mark Walton, Senior Staff Writer - Reviews
on

Star Trek The Video Game is a mess of bugs, glitches, and thoroughly uninspiring shooting.

The Good

  • Good voice acting from the film cast.

The Bad

  • Dull shooting mechanics  
  • Bugs and glitches frequently interfere with gameplay  
  • Terrible enemy and co-op AI  
  • Full of borrowed ideas that aren't up to scratch  
  • By-the-numbers story.

The thing about Star Trek is that it has never really been about the action. Character drama and a continuing quest for knowledge have always been the show's raison d'etre over phaser blasts and exploding spaceships. Well, at least they were until J.J. Abrams got his hands on the property. And it's Abrams' action-packed, lens-flare-infused take on the Star Trek universe that forms the basis of Star Trek The Video Game, a homogeneous and vapid third-person shooter that reduces the inimitable Kirk and Spock to the role of gun-toting foot soldiers. Frankly, they deserve better.

It's not that the idea of a co-op cover-based shooter is inherently a bad one for Star Trek--even if it is a tad unimaginative--but the execution is dire. The plot sees the Federation under attack from the Gorn, a reptilian race featured in the original Star Trek series. They've been given a modern makeover here, turning from campy, rubber-masked creatures into a bunch of generic snarling monsters. They've somehow mustered the brainpower to open rips in space, and it's your job to journey from New Vulcan to the Gorn homeworld to stop them.

That involves being led through starbases, across dusty planets, and along the corridors of the Enterprise, hunkering down behind some conveniently placed cover, and shooting the living hell out of bad guys. There's little of that famed Federation diplomacy at work here: if it moves, you better shoot it. Then you move to the next room and shoot some more. This quickly grows tiresome. Aside from the jarring sight--even for the series reboot--of Kirk and Spock blasting monsters in the face with a phaser-powered shotgun, the shooting isn't that exciting.

The weapons all feel a little weedy, despite some nice "pew pew" sounds, and the Gorn suffer from some terrible AI and glitches. They often get stuck behind walls and fail to notice you shooting their compatriots, even when you're standing right next to them. Character animations are woefully bad, making it look like you're controlling some weird animatronics action figure, while your attempts to take cover often fail to register, leaving you at the mercy of the Gorn's laser fire.

Context-sensitive attempts to open doors or press buttons sometimes fail to activate, terrible signposting and waypoints often leave you with no clue where to go, and at times, your AI co-op partner disappears or gets stuck running into a wall. If that happens before you reach one of the tired co-op actions, such as prying a door open or giving your partner a leg up, then you've no choice but to restart from the last checkpoint. It's simply maddening. These co-op issues are resolved when playing with a buddy online, but despite a recent patch, matchmaking is still flaky, with connections often dropping out.

Some attempt has been made to expand on the corridor-based shooting, but the ideas are a poor mishmash of those from other games. For instance, you can try to complete each level using stealth by tagging bad guys with your tricorder and sneaking around them or by performing a silent takedown. Unfortunately, thanks to the inconsistent AI, the dodgy cover mechanic, and your flaky AI partner, trying to do so is far more trouble than it's worth.

Then there are the climbing sections that borrow heavily from the Uncharted series, offering up glinting sections of walls for you to awkwardly lurch your way along and platforms for you to leap across. The controls just aren't cut out for such endeavours, though, with the sloppy jumping making it difficult to complete these sections. There's also a slow space battle where you take control of the Enterprise's phaser turret, as well as hard-to-control underwater sections, and a level reminiscent of Portal where you're given a teleportation gun and must move your partner past obstacles.

None of these scenarios are particularly fun, and because they're poorly executed, they feel like an afterthought, rather than an integral part of the experience. The rudimentary experience-point system fares a little better, allowing you to upgrade some of your basic abilities, such as the strength of your shields and the power of your phaser. You can even hack turrets so they fire on the enemy, and jam weapons remotely. They are neat touches, but you're never pushed to use these abilities, either by the narrative or by the shooting itself, which remains very much a rote process throughout.

Star Trek's saving grace is the characters, who not only bear the likenesses of the film stars who play them, but have their voices too. Of particular note is Simon Pegg's Scotty, whose thick Scottish accent and penchant for panicking never fail to amuse. There's also some neat back-and-forth between the cold, logical Spock and the charming Kirk as they exchange quips between shots. Kirk even manages a cheeky chat-up line or two along the way.

Still, these are but small wins for a game that never does the licence justice; it's a by-the-numbers shooter that just so happens to have the Star Trek name attached to it. Its numerous bugs and linear missions make it frustrating to play, and the story never grabs you like a good sci-fi adventure should. Even the most devoted of Star Trek fans will be hard pressed to find something to like in Star Trek The Video Game: there are simply too many glaring problems.

Mark Walton
By Mark Walton, Senior Staff Writer - Reviews

Writer, riff maker, purveyor of fine foods. Mark currently spends his days trying to overcome his small (large) obsession with high-top trainers and mobile games. He's known to respond well to Long Island Iced Tea, falafels, and karaoke, but not necessarily in that order.

472 comments
Bytesnap
Bytesnap

Ever since Klingon Academy I've been waiting for a Star Trek game which can be described as "Good". After 13 years, the wait continues...

VintAge68
VintAge68 like.author.displayName 1 Like

Judging by his "by-the-numbers" reviews I will never understand how Mr. Walton became a Senior Staff Writer on GS, honestly. But I guess true Star Trek fans --including me-- will like the game nevertheless.

moonlightwolf01
moonlightwolf01 like.author.displayName like.author.displayName 2 Like

@VintAge68 Really true star-trek fans will like the game. I think you'll find true star trek fans prefer games that do the licence justice and frankly they haven't been doing the licence justice since the reboot, star trek used to be a hell of a lot more than shooting aliens in face with phasers that have been remoddled to look more generically gun-like. Add in the bugs and I can't see any true star trek fan enjoying this garbage.

VintAge68
VintAge68 like.author.displayName 1 Like

Misusing the license is the usual argument against all movie-based video games, I guess.
Unforgivably gun-like looking phasers being used to stun and then temporarily take out some bad aliens... hmm.
Well, I am a Star Trek fan since my childhood but a video game 1:1 based on the original TV series could at best be a comedy today, I reckon.

theCCyberDDemon
theCCyberDDemon

Star Trek won the ''Derivative'' emblem for being a Mass Effect clone in 99% of the time. As a new people also cloned the old USS Enterprise for a new SR1 Normandy, ST staff felt entitled to re-cloning back it as a marketer strategy or by pure act of revenge by right. Startrek deserves much more than a buggy co-op game i think, and a better and original gameplay.

SnuffDaddyNZ
SnuffDaddyNZ

I'm gonna buy this based purely on spite.

A bad space-based shooter is a good space-based shooter almost automatically given they dont' do those anymore!

XCyberForceX
XCyberForceX

LOL!  Nice ending to the review..  Crash and burn!  LOL.

2007nitram
2007nitram

well this is cool I got a free Microsoft points card code and it was legit! Awesomeness!!!! Got it at freemspointsforever? com

cjtopspin
cjtopspin

He may have pointy ears...but it is still Syler.


mahasktiman
mahasktiman

Games based on movies are just MEH....

jonathan9066
jonathan9066 like.author.displayName 1 Like

@mahasktiman Says the guy with the Batman avatar...

lowkey254
lowkey254

Any game that looks like it should be a Digital Download game should never cost $60 bucks.

Justforvisit
Justforvisit like.author.displayName like.author.displayName like.author.displayName like.author.displayName like.author.displayName like.author.displayName like.author.displayName 7 Like

"The game doesn't do the Star Trek Licence justice"

Well, it has something in common with the J.J. Abrams Movies then

Shanks_D_Chop
Shanks_D_Chop like.author.displayName 1 Like

@Justforvisit BAM!

I gotta say, I never got into Star Trek. None of the series. Didn't enjoy them, there was something I didn't like about them.

Sat down with a friend and watched the 2009 Star Trek film, for the first time, the other week. I now look at the Star Trek series in a far more favourable light!

MysteryJ0ker
MysteryJ0ker like.author.displayName 1 Like

Blasphemy! Everyone knows movie-to-game releases never are bad!

GetafixOz
GetafixOz like.author.displayName 1 Like

Oh Noes a movie franchise game that sux, who didnt see that coming.

Konviktion
Konviktion like.author.displayName 1 Like

I wouldn't say it's a bad game. Sure, it has it's shortcomings and bugs but it's not that bad. Actually, I would say it's a decent co-op game. I played it with a friend and we had lots of fun (we are still cracking jokes using the "very fabric of..."-line which the characters used a lot in this game).

Grondiggy
Grondiggy like.author.displayName like.author.displayName like.author.displayName 3 Like

Well I bought the game anyway and I have to say it is no where near as bad as this review makes out. Graphically ut looks pretty good, the environments are varied and interesting and the gorn are pretty scary, tough and vicious.

Good game - 7.0 in my view

potamus66
potamus66 like.author.displayName like.author.displayName like.author.displayName like.author.displayName 4 Like

@Grondiggy good game? lol. sounds like someone doesn't want to admit they spent their money on a bad game. It's either that, or you haven't played many "good" games.

Grondiggy
Grondiggy like.author.displayName like.author.displayName 2 Like

What makes a good game is personal choice and I liked it. You actually played the game?

Tongy26
Tongy26 like.author.displayName 1 Like

@potamus66 @Grondiggy I'm with Grondiggy on this one. Wasn't nearly as bad as this review says. Personal opinion of course but I enjoyed it (terrible space phaser turret level aside!). I'll probably play it through a second time as Spock someday too.

hadlee73
hadlee73

Many studios rush out titles, or do poor games to cash in on a licence, and some just don't have the budgets or the time to make something truly great. But much of the time those kinds of titles are released at a budget price. The real crime here was the publisher releasing a game with so many problems and shortcomings and expecting people to pay the highest possible retail price for it.

popeyfolger
popeyfolger

anyone else notice how long it took them to put up this review? glad i avoided this pile

Spazduck
Spazduck

@popeyfolger It's because the studio didn't send out advance copies to reviewers. I played through the first few hours of the game, and I understand why they didn't want reviews coming out on day one.

Tongy26
Tongy26

@popeyfolger Maybe Mark secretly enjoyed it but wanted to wait to see what everyone else thought before sticking his neck out for a fun,though badly executed, movie tie-in. ;-)

Conversation powered by Livefyre

Game Stats

Also on: