Star Trek Online The Future Past: Part 1

Posted Jan 17, 2010 11:54 am GMT

@Link2Hyrule what version of the script have you been reading? :S they do comment on the destruction of romulus infact they tell you in the game what planet is now the romulan capital ,,, ,,, @arcp59 its the borg ... they always come back...or maybe they just never read the novels,,,infact having played the open beta I'm doubtful they've actually even watched as many episodes as they would like you to beleive...

• agree 0
• disagree 0
• = 0
• Sign in to rate this comment

Posted Dec 21, 2009 10:24 pm GMT

@arcp59
If they were concerned with continuity at all they would have taken into account the fact that Romulus was destroyed a couple of years after Nemesis takes place, as seen in Star Trek XI. Also, to those saying the Enterprise never gets caught up in the big wars, let me just remind you that the Enterprise is the Federations Flagship; meaning that when war does break out, the Enterprise is right there in the front lines. In front of the front lines, even. They just never showed it because the only war that went on during any of the series (except ST: Enterprise), the Dominion War, took place during DS9, so the Enterprises actions were all backgrounded.

• agree 0
• disagree 1
• = -1
• Sign in to rate this comment

Posted Dec 19, 2009 9:28 pm GMT

i do think this game will not end up doing well tho as I have previously stated, but as I have played wow for over 4 years now I am ready for a new mmo and will give this a shot. nothing against wow I am just bored with it for one, and two i really think with technology being the way it is that wow could do more to make the player feel involved in their quests..

• agree 0
• disagree 0
• = 0
• Sign in to rate this comment

Posted Dec 19, 2009 9:26 pm GMT

@impost3r oh I am going to try it out I have decided I just was making a point, but i understand that most people would rather shoot things than negotiate with them, I just hope they give you that option

• agree 0
• disagree 0
• = 0
• Sign in to rate this comment

Posted Dec 15, 2009 7:54 pm GMT

U telling me the federation didn't this coming with the Klingon on the rampage? I'm totally a Star Trek fan but this weak story line is bad, the graphic worse........ Im a bit taken back and feel gimped again from a good Star Trek Game.

• agree 1
• disagree 0
• = +1
• Sign in to rate this comment

Posted Dec 10, 2009 10:46 am GMT

NERD RAGE!!!!!

• agree 0
• disagree 2
• = -2
• Sign in to rate this comment

Posted Nov 26, 2009 12:19 am GMT

This game overall looks pretty disappointing...

• agree 0
• disagree 6
• = -6
• Sign in to rate this comment

Posted Nov 21, 2009 3:06 am GMT

@dg3215

Yeah, the game does look violent. I certainly don't have issues with violence in games, but I do know what Star Trek is actually about and I know that it isn't about violence or hollywood style action. You make a good point, but I think you should give the game a chance. Maybe they are just focusing on the action parts in the trailer because that's what will hook their audience. Maybe there is another side to the game that we aren't seeing.

• agree 1
• disagree 1
• = 0
• Sign in to rate this comment

Posted Nov 21, 2009 2:56 am GMT

I really hope this game is well optimized. Champs Online was pretty damn terrible in terms of optimization. I have a GTX 295 now so I am not really worried about running this. But I don't want to be playing "alone" or with a half dead community because nobody can run the game.

• agree 2
• disagree 0
• = +2
• Sign in to rate this comment

Posted Oct 28, 2009 6:50 am GMT

To everyone who thinks that there shouldn't be fighting in a Star Trek game - if there was no real fighting in Star Trek, if Gene Roddenberry didn't think that fighting might break out, they wouldn't have bothered weaponizing Starfleet in the first place. Also, to you graphics nuts, IT'S PRE-BETA FOOTAGE!!!

• agree 2
• disagree 1
• = +1
• Sign in to rate this comment

Posted Oct 26, 2009 8:54 am GMT

Eh... could be interesting but the ships seem to turn far too quickly.

• agree 1
• disagree 1
• = 0
• Sign in to rate this comment

Posted Oct 25, 2009 10:18 pm GMT

naaa

• agree 0
• disagree 1
• = -1
• Sign in to rate this comment

Posted Oct 22, 2009 7:59 am GMT

degenerate:

I take it you've haven't watched the series DS9, where the Federation fought a war for 2 entire seasons. A lot of military action has taken place in Star Trek since the TNG.

• agree 2
• disagree 1
• = +1
• Sign in to rate this comment

Posted Oct 21, 2009 12:35 pm GMT

Looks sweet, can't wait to try it.

• agree 3
• disagree 1
• = +2
• Sign in to rate this comment

Posted Oct 21, 2009 6:59 am GMT

Seems awfully Star Warsy to me as opposed to Star Trek...
@dg3215
There may have been large scale battles in the Next Generation universe, but the Enterprise was hardly engaged in anything like that. The Enterprise was more or less a traveling conference ship where diplomatic negotiations occurred. There were occasional spats, but the ship/crew hardly ever resorted to violence to settle disputes. More in the originals, yes, but rarely in TNG.

• agree 1
• disagree 2
• = -1
• Sign in to rate this comment

Posted Oct 19, 2009 3:28 am GMT

Looks somewhat outdated.

• agree 1
• disagree 1
• = 0
• Sign in to rate this comment

Posted Oct 18, 2009 3:30 pm GMT

The wars and conflicts with the races just sets up the two factions- Federation and Klingon Empire- to make sense within an MMO. It does not appear as linear as dg3215 seems to think if you research beyond this preview video. Exploration and your bridge crew will play a huge roll while you play.

• agree 2
• disagree 0
• = +2
• Sign in to rate this comment

Posted Oct 18, 2009 2:26 pm GMT

at lest their will be lot to do

• agree 2
• disagree 0
• = +2
• Sign in to rate this comment