Play
Please use a flash video capable browser to watch videos.
00:00:00
Sorry, but you can't access this content!
Please enter your date of birth to view this video

By clicking 'enter', you agree to GameSpot's
Terms of Use and Privacy Policy

Review

Ryse: Son of Rome Review

  • Game release: November 22, 2013
  • Reviewed:
  • XONE

You are not entertained.

by

Ryse: Son of Rome is huge in scale, but small in scope. For all the stunning spectacle it throws at you--the sight of a hundred-strong army laying bloody waste to a barbarian horde, the march of a legion as hulking great fireballs rain down from the sky--your part in it all is that of an outlier, a lone wolf single-handedly trying to save a crumbling empire. What you're left with, then, are the scraps: small melee battles against a procession of mindless opponents who you slaughter in painfully shallow third-person combat.

What initially seems like an impressive system based on precision and timing, largely thanks to some nice visual cues and elegant slow-motion animations, quickly becomes an exercise in mind-numbing tedium--and with just a sword and a shield attack on offer, it's hardly surprising. Sure, there are blocks, dodges, and counters to help things along, but when you're faced with opponents whose repetitive moves you'll have seen in their entirety after the first hour of the game, it's not long before you've experienced everything the combat system has to offer and figured out a sequence to repeat ad nauseam.

Even the gruesome stabs and bloody dismemberments of hero Marius' quick-time finishing moves do little to ease the banality of it all. Blood is spilled with such ferocious regularity in Ryse that what was once shocking and impressive is soon reduced to just another repetitive sight to endure. Killing enemies is less and less satisfying every time you lop off another limb, and for a game that's all about the combat, that's a really big problem. It's not as if you can avoid the bloody finishing moves either, with bonuses such as health regeneration and experience boosts tied to the attacks.

And so battles quickly blur into one another as you're endlessly marched from one small group of opponents to another, spilling litres of barbarian blood along the way. The odd turret defense mission and sections where you march a small legion towards a tower--raising shields to avoid a flurry of fiery arrows along the way--do their best to mix things up, but these moments are short-lived and so painfully easy that you feel like you might as well not be in control of the game at all. Even the moments when it seems like the game is drawing you into the larger fight offer only the illusion of control. You can bark orders at the Kinect to unleash a flurry of arrows, or choose where you want to station your archers while you fight, but all you have to do is play such battles a few times to discover that your choices have little bearing on the battle at large.

Ryse is all sizzle and no steak, a stunning visage paired with a vapid personality.

It's a good thing that stream is there, because Marius will need a bath after this battle.

That you're funneled into these battles along tightly controlled paths without any sense of exploration hammers home the fact that Ryse is a graphical show pony for the Xbox One, rather than a fully fleshed-out experience. Incredibly detailed cities and huge, beautiful vistas with impressive draw distances lure you into thinking that this is a living, breathing world, but as soon as you try to venture off the beaten path to explore it, you're sent crashing back to reality. Sure, many games put up invisible walls in an effort to keep the narrative and action flowing, but Son of Rome does little to disguise its limitations. You can climb up a huge towering wall one moment, only to have the savior of the Roman Empire stopped dead in his tracks seconds later by a small plank of wood. It's simply maddening.

With brain-dead combat playing such a large role in Ryse, it falls to the story to keep you ploughing through the battles. The trouble is that the hackneyed tale of murder and revenge is so full of cliches and iffy dialogue that it's hard to take it seriously. That I actually laughed out loud when Marius was asked to "put on this hat" to take his place as a centurion speaks volumes about the script here. Things pick up a little later in the game, particularly when you meet the wonderfully acted and thoroughly despicable sons of Emperor Nero, but for the most part, the story--like the combat--serves to showcase impressive visual touches such as the eerily good facial animation, rather than flesh out the game.

The online arena co-op mode mirrors the campaign's problems. The impressive-looking Colosseum is filled with spikes and obstacles, and it's there that you perform mindless missions like knocking over a cauldron to burn a catapult, or--in a wonder of originality--knocking over a cauldron to burn a pit of barbarians. It doesn't help that you're stuck using the same monotonous combat system as in the single-player game to fight off the waves of barbarians hurled at you, the only tweak being that you must choose a single bonus power such as health regeneration or strength boosts, rather than have access to them all. It's a mode you'll play once, and then never touch again.

Ryse 2 will be a buddy comedy.

Ryse is all sizzle and no steak, a stunning visage paired with a vapid personality. Everything from the leveling system that's so painfully easy to complete (and so devoid of any impact on the game that it might as well not be there), to the story that does little to flesh out its lead characters beyond puerile notions of revenge is a testament to how little Ryse can back up its gorgeous visuals with anything more than a shallow set of fisticuffs.

The Good
Wonderful visuals
Some fantastic vocal performances
The Bad
Combat is shallow and repetitive
Lays the gore on so thick that a severed limb quickly becomes yawn-worthy
Often laughable script
Bland multiplayer modes
Tightly controlled paths stop you from exploring the beautiful scenery
4
Poor
About GameSpot's Reviews

About the Author

/ Staff

Mark loves a good action game, having reviewed the likes of DmC: Devil May Cry and God of War: Ascension. He somehow willed himself to play Ryse through to completion, and spent an evening hammering through some multiplayer on Xbox Live.

Discussion

5184 comments
Gaz134
Gaz134

This game deserves much more than 4/10. Yes it's shallow, but it's a lot of fun, something a game should be. 7 is much more accurate IMO.

hitomo
hitomo

best graphics ever + decent game = 8.9

downcore
downcore

Conan was much better of this

worryingrash
worryingrash

I think a lot of people who've actually bought and played this game find it really fun. It's definitely not an 8 or 9 out of 10 - but I think 6.5 - 7.5 is probably a fair review range. It looks beautiful and the action is simple but fun - it's the kind of game you'll stick on if you've got an hour or two to kill, or if some buddies come round and you want to show off the system's gorgeous graphical capability a bit. Not brilliant - and not worth full-price, but not as terrible as 4/10 and well worth buying second-hand or if Xbox Live do a good discount on it. 

heznave
heznave

Ok so I held off playing this game because of reviews but recently got it through gamefly and... It was really fun! It's a great rent, not sure if I'd pay more than $19.99 for it because of the fairly short story and lack of online community (as of today, April 12th, I cannot find a coop match online). If you were intrigued by this game but stayed away like me, I highly suggest playing through it.

oflow
oflow

Not that great of a review.  I felt the game was comparable to Uncharted. Same type of gameplay, game was fun to me.  Its not a masterpiece but its at least a 7.5.

Almost didnt buy ti because of this review but I'm glad I did was worth playing thru.

NTM23
NTM23

While these aren't the only problems, if it had been less linear and had more gameplay variety, it to me could have been superb, but as it was, I actually enjoyed it.

Zenwork21
Zenwork21

Not the greatest game ever, however I think the it deserves more than 4, I do enjoy it so I would give it at least 7

Regards


nebu10us
nebu10us

I almost didn't buy this game because of the review, but decided to buy it anyway and try it for myself. A 4, seriously? I loved this game! I don't see why it should have points taken away for not having an open world - not every game does, nor should it. Repetitive? Has this reviewer not played Assassin's Creed or call of duty? How do they get 8's and 9's and this game a 4? Also, no mention of the collectibles in the game, did the reviewer not explore and get those?

The visuals are AMAZING and script/voice acting great, I beat it today and want to play it again on a harder mode. Everyone I know who has played it has liked the game.

I'm not saying it's a 10 game, because it's not. It is a little repetitive, but the boss fights are each a little different, you have to use strategy to defeat them. I'd give this game a 7, worth the money and lots of fun but it's not epic. I could even settle for a 6.5, but a 4 is unjust.

I'm so disappointed in the quality of this review. It's one of many reviews that just haven't been accurate on this site lately. Some have been rated to high, others too low. I'm not sure if this particular reviewer was paid off by Sony, just doesn't like Xbox, or just doesn't like this genre, but his review sucks. Read the comments here and you'll get a better review than this idiot wrote. Sadly, I feel it's time to move on from gamespot; GS reviews are terrible and this one is the straw that breaks the camels back.

empiresdownfall
empiresdownfall

Eh, I like the game. It's not perfect by a long shot, but Im having a pretty decent time with it. 

waynesc242
waynesc242

Some people just expect too much! Ryse is a good game and the story line and combat system keeps you busy and entertained!

Kryptonbornson
Kryptonbornson

Just rented this game. I thought the graphics were full motion video until I saw a button prompt. Maybe the best looking game yet. Only thinking of Battlefield 4 Ultra outside of combat, can I think of any games that I'd say look just as good. It's scary what this weak console hardware is capable of.

Assimilat0r
Assimilat0r

Diablo 3 got  8 , this game got 4, i must switch to IGN. GS became pile of crap.

bilal2005
bilal2005

@mark walton.... read please the comments and edit your article...

bilal2005
bilal2005

Very nice game and entertaining.... My rate is 8.5/10

harithhammoshi
harithhammoshi

What hell Really 4rate from 10 ?! i will give at least 8.5 to 9 \ 10 !!!! -_-

inscript
inscript

i'd bet if there was a review pole here that 4 rating would change

inscript
inscript

Mark Walton Your gaming reviews are off on a few pages, a 7/8 would of been a little better. how could you judge this game with a rating of a 4 this game is actually one of my top 3 of next gen games. If for some reason Ryse is a tittle you don't have interest in then you should of let others handle this matter cause right now your reviews are suspect judging from the comments below

LtReviews
LtReviews

Combat in this game is so shallow its literally intellectually insulting.


Can't say I didn't have some good moments playing through it, but it was mostly just brainless button mashing that looked really cool.

grey_fox1984
grey_fox1984

I'm actually having a lot more fun with this than with Dead Rising 3 - Ryse actually feels like a next-gen experience and the combat feels really great. It's sort of like the Batman games, but with a much weightier feel. The setting and the story are really good too; despite the cliches Mark talks about in his review, it's presented well enough that I was along for the ride until the very end. It could use a bit more variety in its weapons (with a sword/shield combo being the only option, aside from the odd crossbow turret or spear to throw), but I think this is a good launch game that provides a lot of thrills, some great voice/mocap performances and plenty of eye-candy to show off your Xbox One. It's not a game of the year contender by any stretch, but if you were waiting for a good console Rome game and don't mind a short and sweet, linear hack and slash, Ryse won't disappoint. It would be hard to call it "great", but it's definitely better than "poor". I think "decent" is a fair thing to call it and it deserves a 6.5 or maybe even a soft 7.0. 

jayjay444
jayjay444

Half decent story but nothing special also the game looks like its a hack and slash kind of game but it isn't, there's different tactics for most of the enemy in the game you also need to time counter attacks perfectly. MP is okay for a short amount of time, there's also collectibles in the campaign and the graphics are easily the best on the Xone I can't wait to see what they can do 4-5 years from now, in my personal opinion this is a solid 6/10 maybe a 6.5, the game is good if you like these types of games but if your thinking of getting a Xone I would get Dead Rising 3 or Forza those are the 2 best games on it at the moment. 

BillKam
BillKam

This is a really enjoyable game, when i read the review i knew that most of the comments would disagree with the score ,i wont write anything more because i m so tired with reviewers (?) or whatever some people call themselves ..i m not saying its a masterpiece...but 4??? go home Gamespot you re drunk!

VakarianGirl
VakarianGirl

I just completed Ryse last night.  It was my first next-gen game on my new XBox One.  It wouldn't have been - but due to a defective disc drive Advance Exchange deal with MS, I chose to pick Ryse as my free consolation game as we already had been given Forza 5 by a relative.


I have to say, this review to me does not do the game ANY justice.  This game is a straight-forward hack-and-slash, yes - but it has aspects that set it far and above a lot of other games.  It gives the player a great insight (albeit a bit fantastical) into life in the Roman empire, and what Rome was like in its heyday.  It's graphics are absolutely nothing short of STUNNING, and that is coming from someone who is VERY critical of graphics.  And - perhaps most importantly for me - is the voice acting.  There was not one weak voice actor in this game.  I don't know who they got to voice Marius (the player character), but he was SPECTACULAR.  He had presence, nuance, emotion and sensibility.  What an awesome job by this guy!!


My personal score would be 8/10.  Oh - and the multiplayer is pretty awesome, because they took out PvP because it "wasn't fun".  So - now we're just left with the great fun multiplayer co-op in the Colosseum - what a great format!!  I am really enjoying another multiplayer where I can work WITH other players, and not against them!!

FAIL_TR0LL
FAIL_TR0LL

The critics really fumbled the ball on this one. Everything was so overwhelmingly negative about this game, but first hand accounts from average gamers is very positive. People are enjoying it. I bought it today based on the recommendation from the CAGcast folks and think it's pretty darn good. Not a masterpiece, but a solid 7

Gerrelli
Gerrelli

Wow, 4 is tough, I had to decide within 10 minutes as to if I should buy a Xbox One or a PS4, due to the dwindling availability of the PS4. I chose the Xbox One based on the fact it had some games I don't already have on the PC (BF4) so I got the Xbox One for this game (and obviously Titan Fall) and I have to say I don't regret it at all. I rarely play single player games, PC gamers typically play pure MP, but I've really enjoyed the Roman Campaign, the graphics are immersive and realistic and it looks great on a 52" LCD HD TV. I didn't notice many bugs.

Pondelicious
Pondelicious

I'm usually one who thinks people shouldn't bash reviewers for scores they think are bad. But this is just plain ridiculous. Sure, the game is not worthy of a 9/10. But i think at the very least a 6/10. The combat may be repetitive and their may be invisible walls etc. But to give the game 4/10? A score like that suggests to me that the game is broken or buggy and is just simply not enjoyable. Since I picked it up, I have had a blast and I just can't comprehend how Mark hated this game so much

Shahnil
Shahnil

Probably one of the worst and unfair reviews on Gamespot in recent memory. Not a 9 or a 8 but man not a 4 that's just ridiculous.

punisher1001
punisher1001

Could not disagree more. I picked up Ryse despite the negative review given by Walton. I think the review was pretty harsh and unfair.  The game was fun and parts of it were challenging. The story wasn't a masterpiece but nothing to merit a four out of ten.  A score this low is given to a broken game and this clearly not the case. 

jombazy
jombazy

LOOOL  you are the worst reviewer ever !!!


this game deserve 9 and above, one of the best games ever played, and still playing it on legendary mode and arena


can't stop enjoying this EPIC GAME !!!


Thank you Crytek and microsoft for RYSE !! i hope to see Ryse 2 in the near future


BE FAIR GAMESPOT!!


Grenadeh
Grenadeh

Protip to all noob ass gamers: God of War did not invent hack and slash. Devil May Cry came out years before God of War, so did the first Ninja Gaiden reboot, and Prince of Persia came out before that. Even before that, such games were around.


So just because you don't know shit about games, doesn't make it okay to call every game that has melee combat a God of War knockoff. Fuck God of War, it sucks. That's right, I have all 6 games, have played all 6, and they suck, so stop acting like they are special.



Grenadeh
Grenadeh

Rofl 4. Once again GameSpot lacks the simple respect - self-respect - to even do their jobs properly. As professionals it's utterly pathetic for you to sit here, with a scoring system that used to be publicly available for all visitors - and knowingly score games based on a whim because you didn't like them, rather than scoring them based on a pretty specific rubric that your site has used for years. Get the fuck out of here with your 4. 


Everyone on GS who isn't illiterate and pre-dates the site change knows a 4 is intended for broken games that are completely glitchy and barely playable.


Ryse is none of those things. The graphics are amazing, the combat system is fluid and fully functional, the voice acting and story are well contructed and even the historical accuracy holds true.

Fallenlords69
Fallenlords69

Ryse is worth more than 4.   What it attempts to do is worth more than 4.  To score it 4 is a joke, not with regards to the game ... but with regards to the reviewer.  All Gamespot seems to do these days is bear-bait for the most part.  Then complain when people complain.

I don't really care what 'Mark Walton' thinks, when I visit a site for a review of a game.  I want impartial viewpoints, some sort of journalistic integrity to give me a review with an eye to the target audience of the game in mind.  I want to look and see fair reviews,  so far Gamespot deliberately underscored GTA 5 and 'The Last of Us' to generate traffic.  I would spend less time on redesigning the website, which is terrible by the way, and more time on hiring people that can write a review.  Not based on personal opinion, of which I don't care about at all, but based on a solid review of a product highlighting the pro's and con's.

'Steak with no sizzle'...who on earth is going to buy Ryse that doesn't first have an interest in Rome, sword-play, blood/guts/gore and lots of melee fighting.  Probably nobody, so does it tick boxes for the people that would naturally buy the game.  Err... yes.  The first time you step into the Coliseum is breathtaking, it's visually stunning.  The combat might look simple but there is an art to it's mastery that is fulfilling by the time you get to the end of the game, if you like that sort of combat.   Is it a bit the same, well yes most game are.  Batman Arkham Origins is all punch/pop and pow away. COD is all shooting ... etc. 


So all in all for me, for the target audience of this game it works.  For people on the fence, do they get an informative review that weighs up the pro's and con's of the game.  No, they just get a bitch moaning about repetition... like that isn't a common problem in games.

disneyskate
disneyskate

Too shallow to be a 7. Whether you enjoyed it or not, the content and it's quality isn't worthy of a 7.

serchenko9
serchenko9

@nebu10us  I'm surprised with the score of the review, the game is fun, addictive and challenging. 
I can't believe that someone who has completed the game gave a score of 4 because there is no exploration (who cares? I have come to save Rome not to take walks in the woods) or combat is repetitive (sorry? did you try to improve Marius with the blocked finishing moves?).

I bought the game in digital version for 30$ and it's more than worth.

Reading reviews like this I think the gaming press is definitely sic or near death for me..

disneyskate
disneyskate

So I shouldn't expect too much for THE F***ING LAUNCH TITLE OF A NEXT GENERATION SYSTEM? Yeah, sureee. The game that's supposed to show us how advanced the new systems are should NOT be this shallow, and we should NOT tolerate it.

Dannystaples14
Dannystaples14

@bilal2005  Why the hell would he do that and make a mockery of what the whole point of a review is in the process? A review is a well structured opinion. If you really want to turn it around make your own review.

Dannystaples14
Dannystaples14

@inscript  What the hell is it with you people and not knowing what a review is?

A review isn't one person trying to incorporate every single person's opinion on the planet into one neat little bow. It is a well structured OPINION. His opinion to be specific.

They chose him to do the review, and he gave his opinion of it. There are plenty more reviews on the internet for you to go look at. You can choose to only read the ones that are good if you want to justify your own feelings towards the game if you really want to.

oflow
oflow

@grey_fox1984  I agree with this review.  I'd give it an average rating as far as gameplay but it is next gen visually and the story and gameplay were as good as say Uncharted 2.  

I could tell they wanted to do a lot more with this game, with the way the arena level works, they really wanted to make this a hard core mp game but had to launch it.  

Could use a few more moves and more in depth combat. If it had the weapon choices and the moves of Spartacus: Legends, I would play this all the time.

It was more so just showing more of the CryEngine.  

They should do licensed DLC for this game with say Game of Thrones or Spartacus. 
I'd buy it.

Shahnil
Shahnil

@Pondelicious Gamespot keeps losing credibility for me with their reviews. Just way to inconsistent and I feel like no streamline thinking process exist so you get trolls like this one. The site was just my first for gaming outside of gamefaqs and since 98 I always had a tingly feeling for it.


Your right about 4/10 should be given to buggy games and in fact this is how it use to be done years back until trolls started taking over. The only guy I listen to here is Kevin, everyone else I just use to get a general feel of the game.

jombazy
jombazy

@Grenadeh totally agree with you, this game deserve 9 and above


this reviewer and gamespot aren't fair which made me to quit trusting in this website

meatz666
meatz666

@Fallenlords69  There are good non-editorial game sites, I agree that Gamespot is more about the feelings than technicality. Watch Angry Joe's reviews, they are pretty good. He tells how many stages a game has, how long is the campaign...

And about the click-bait... Dude... GTA5 got a 9. How can you say "deliberately underscored"?

Carrig90
Carrig90

@Dannystaples14 @inscript   You are doing the same with inscript's opinion, why you criticize his point of view while he is saying a BIG true ?  What's your problem with people's opinion as we have the right to say what we think ? So listen because you don't own the truth man. This review has no point and everyone knows it. This game is not a 4 score game just because it's one of the best games that have been developed this year, and I think you are insulting developers with your pointless reviews and underestimating a great and hard job. So the story plot and combat technics make it a nice game that deserves a better punctuation and I think that a review has to be imparcial , the author's opinion has nothing to do when you are writing a review as a professional. If you don't like combat games like this, where you will be fighting again and again that's your problem, but there's a lot of people that enjoy playing war games, or shooter games, that have always the same combat mechanics. Is that a negative point to get a 4 score? So unprofessional, to be honest this review is disappointing and insulting for gaming industry

Grenadeh
Grenadeh

@meatz666 @Fallenlords69 Angry Joe is completely emotional though, it just depends on if it's a game he actually was interested in. Rome 2 was a great example.

Fallenlords69
Fallenlords69

@meatz666@Fallenlords69GTA 5 was scored down for pathetic reasons, as was The Last of Us.  It was like Gamespot were determined not to give top scores, just to be different.  

Ryse isn't great but it also isn't that bad and certainly doesn't deserve a 4.  To pull up a game like Ryse on repetition, laughable script, poor multiplayer and tightly controlled pathways... well there should be a lot more games scoring a 4. It's not a 4 it's a 6 at least, possibly a 7 depending on how liberal you are with the scores.  


I look to a gaming site to inform me, so I can make possible purchasing decisions.  All you get these days, especially from this site, is bollocks...

Dannystaples14
Dannystaples14

@Carrig90 @inscript  I believe in credit where credit is due and discredit where it is needed.

The problem comes in when you take into account that all reviews are opinion. If I don't like a game for x, y and z reasons, it would be my job as a professional reviewer and games journalist to call them out on those issues. That is how progress is made.

If a developer works his ass off to get a game out and it still sucks then it is probably time they found a new profession is it not? Why keep around such people who are a detriment to the industry.

Imagine if everyone gave Ryse 10/10 for every review because the developers did work really very hard bless them. We'd probably end up in COD syndrome where everyone tried to copy the game and then we'd end up with what is essentially a mediocre game for the majority of people, for the next two or so years.

Many people said it was better than they thought not many people say it is the up with the best games.

That is WHY we have ratings. The best get the high scores, the less able get lower scores.

The point is Mark thought it was a poor game and gave some reasonable reasons for it. How does that in any way reflect on your own opinion of the game? Why does the average score it gets online mean anything to you?

If everyone on the planet but you hates something, why would they all make stellar reviews about it?

meatz666
meatz666

@Grenadeh @meatz666 @Fallenlords69 He normally breaks down the review in two parts. The first is a more technical approach. And the second part is the ranting, I agree. Jeff does it similar too in GB.

Fallenlords69
Fallenlords69

@Grenadeh@Fallenlords69 I Am Alive, involves making moral choices and deciding who/when to help etc. It's a post apocalyptic survival game. At a stretch is has platformer elements akin to Tomb Raider, Uncharted or Prince of Persia.  Climbing is a big aspect in the game because it's hiding the lack of depth the game has overall.  This was suppose to be a AAA title, it was shown off by Ubisoft as a centre-piece game.  But then it had a troubled development history and ended up not knowing what it was ...

Grenadeh
Grenadeh

@Fallenlords69 @Grenadeh Involves? The vast majority of the gamplay in IAA is platforming. There are only a few moments where you aren't climbing something. You have no idea what you're talking about, good day sir. 

Fallenlords69
Fallenlords69

@GrenadehThe similarity of I Am Alive and The Last of Us, is post apocalyptic survival based on limited resources.  I wouldn't call I Am Alive a platformer just because it involves some climbing.    The concept of I Am Alive is nice, but poorly executed and dogged by a very troubled development history.  Ubisoft didn't allow them to make the game they wanted to make.  Flipside, Naughty Dog released a blockbuster AAA game which is what I Am Alive was suppose to be all along.   Overall point the same reviewer scored both games 9 which is just incomprehensible.

Grenadeh
Grenadeh

@Fallenlords69 @meatz666 I Am Alive never tried to be anything remotely similar to The Last of Us. IAA is a survival platformer - a realistic one in comparison to TLOU - whereas TLOU tries to be both a survival game, and a horror game, at the same time and fails at both, managing only to be a movie with some third person shooter mixed in.


Ridiculous that you would compare two completely unrelated games based on the misconception that TLOU is a survival game.

Fallenlords69
Fallenlords69

@meatz666@Fallenlords69Has to be comparable.  The reviewer that reviewed 'The Last of Us' scored the game 9 the same as 'I am Alive' a game that tries and fails to be what 'The Last of Us' is overall.  This site scored GTA 4 a 10, only Carolyn getting on 'her' high horse about misogyny scored GTA 5 down.  There needs to be some semblance of order and logic to the way reviews are handled.  GTA 5 is on a par with 4 if not to a lot of people better. The review scores on this site don't reflect that, because a person wanted to be all politically correct in a franchise that has taken the mick out of everything since inception.

As for telling the difference between scores, yes GTA 5 deserved a 10 ... not because it was a perfect game.  Because no game is ever going to be perfect, but for the scope of what it was trying to accomplish.  The Last of Us, deserved a 10 for the same reasons.  To pull games apart for unjustifiable reasons, as in this case with Ryse.  Is a joke, unless you are going to apply the same reasoning and logic to all the reviews. But that doesn't seem to happen.  Other games can slide on being repetitive, laughable script etc....

I don't believe this site has a review score system of any sort, it's just opinion. Not very good ones at that...

meatz666
meatz666

@Fallenlords69 @meatz666  I still disagree with "GTA 5 was scored down for pathetic reasons, as was The Last of Us.  It was like Gamespot were determined not to give top scores, just to be different.". Gamespot changed their review score system, and again, 8 and 9 are good grades. Can you physically tell the differences between a 9 game and a 10?

Ryse: Son of Rome More Info

First Release on Nov 22, 2013
  • Xbox One
Ryse is a gritty, visceral action game that draws gamers into the epic times of the Roman Empire.
6.9
Average User RatingOut of 285 User Ratings
Please Sign In to rate Ryse: Son of Rome
Developed by:
Crytek
Published by:
Microsoft Game Studios
Genres:
Adventure, 3D, Action
Content is generally suitable for ages 17 and up. May contain intense violence, blood and gore, sexual content and/or strong language.
Mature
All Platforms