The Lord of the Rings: Conquest Video Review

  • 126,988 Views
  • Posted Jan 14, 2009

Head into Mordor with Chris Watters in this video review for The Lord of the Rings: Conquest.

Upload Your Own Videos

Watch cool and crazy videos from GameSpot users just like you, and vote for your favorites! Subscribers and users level 10 and higher get to upload their own.

Choose your preferred download format:

HD Windows Media
211.7MB 
Sign In
Hi-Res H.264 MP4
55.0MB 
Download
Lo-Res MPEG
48.4MB 
Download
Lo-Res IPOD / PSP
12.0MB 
Download
close [x]

Use these links to add the GameSpot player to another site (html) or your GameSpot blog (bbcode).

  • BBCODE:

  • 640PX WIDE:

  • 480PX WIDE:

close [x]

358 Comments

  • BlinDShoT95

    Posted Nov 1, 2009 10:56 am PT

    Don't comprehend why this only got a 6.5 -- the entire review was about how awesome it is.

  • Mike0193

    Posted Oct 28, 2009 10:11 pm PT

    Played the demo and it's hella fun. I'ma buy it for its 20$ price tag ! I want a new Star Wars Battlefront game on the consoles too though. Of course atleast we'll be getting an awesome one for the psp.

  • Hancock495

    Posted Oct 20, 2009 11:02 am PT

    I thought he was going to give it a 8.5 or something but still an awesome review.

  • Soapweed

    Posted Oct 1, 2009 3:26 pm PT

    This license has had the crap beaten out of it. Enough LOTR games, the last movie was 6 years ago.

  • _Ben99_

    Posted Sep 28, 2009 2:47 am PT

    pass

  • Malscyllis

    Posted Sep 22, 2009 9:22 pm PT

    "capture the flag...ring" lol

  • 20096

    Posted Sep 21, 2009 6:47 pm PT

    Wy did they rate this game so low, almost everything he said about it was good. In my opinoun ths is the best reviewer, what's his name. I give it a 8.5-10

  • fratstratraz

    Posted Aug 26, 2009 7:58 am PT

    I found I only had to button mash when I was less skilled at the game. As soon as I got the hang of it, I started consciously making combos and using certain abilities at certain times. If you get good at it, this game can be fun! Though the online set up is a bit too disorganized for me. I prefer the setups of games like COD 4 and Halo 3.

  • tommiea

    Posted Aug 21, 2009 11:24 am PT

    thought it was a cool game but there is alot of button mashing, especially when your out numbered and your clan are nowhere to be seen!!!

  • kotormerc

    Posted Aug 4, 2009 5:48 pm PT

    Plus the scout class has one it kills and invisibility so they kinda run around and kill you randomly

  • kotormerc

    Posted Aug 4, 2009 5:47 pm PT

    The game is sweet. Id give it an 8. The last level makes you feel horrible and awesome at the same time.

  • dingleberry01

    Posted Aug 1, 2009 9:32 pm PT

    I feel the score is a little condratictory to the review. It seems like he really enjoyed the game and the few flaws he found were really not that big a deal. should have got at least a 7-7.5

  • masterfarticus

    Posted Jul 19, 2009 6:12 pm PT

    I think it deserves at least an 8.5....

  • lonewolf1196

    Posted Jul 17, 2009 11:38 am PT

    must....resist....cackleing....must resist.... okay i give up mwa-ha-ha-ha-ha-ha

  • lonewolf1196

    Posted Jul 17, 2009 11:37 am PT

    awsome but it sounds like a 8.o not a 6.5

  • lotr15

    Posted Jul 7, 2009 7:25 pm PT

    Great game. Great review. But like Aroshtar said, he did make it sound like it was an 8.0 - 8.5

  • Aroshtar

    Posted Jul 6, 2009 10:43 pm PT

    NOTHING the reviewer says denotes a 6.5
    7.0 at least. The way he's reviewing it, it seems like an 8.0

  • Jonwh18

    Posted Jul 3, 2009 11:54 am PT

    I've played my friends and I'd give it a 9 at the least

  • danielkr94

    Posted Jun 29, 2009 9:44 am PT

    i agree i gotthe demo it should be 7.5

  • Imakuleus

    Posted Jun 29, 2009 9:07 am PT

    If it's anything like Battlefront, I'm getting it. 2 player co op split screen? Oh yea baby, yea!

  • yaarg3636

    Posted Jun 27, 2009 9:29 am PT

    in the two towers u have like 1 or 3 guys to help that die in one hit but this u have a lot of help up to 100 to 80

  • xfootballx

    Posted Jun 13, 2009 8:17 pm PT

    The review he gives and the score it has doesn't go together.. The way he puts it; it should be a 7.5 or 8.

    My favorite reviewer by the way.

  • yaarg3636

    Posted Jun 13, 2009 8:28 am PT

    it should be like 7.5

  • 12moose12

    Posted May 31, 2009 9:23 am PT

    This game looks good unlike The lord of the rings the third age which is very dissapointing

  • cod_rulez123

    Posted May 24, 2009 8:50 am PT

    good review

  • kickballer

    Posted May 18, 2009 7:57 pm PT

    This game is just what I was looking for, being part of the army, not the bird's eye view captain.

  • 1b2b3b posted May 13, 2009 3:33 pm PT (does not meet display criteria. sign in to show)

    1b2b3b

    Posted May 13, 2009 3:33 pm PT (hide)

    I HAVE COMPLET THIS GAME IN 2 HOURS ON PC

  • redmilk

    Posted May 9, 2009 8:10 am PT

    i have this game and its really good. But you will get really bored quick if u dot play online though.

  • link64rocksya

    Posted Apr 28, 2009 5:09 pm PT

    good revewer

  • Mr_Fujiv1

    Posted Apr 23, 2009 2:56 am PT

    this looks really good.
    i had the ps2 versions twin towers and return of the king and they were alright but this one gives you like a rushed feel like your really on the battle field i went off LOTR games but i am defo getting this

  • hughami

    Posted Apr 22, 2009 5:13 pm PT

    i heard the game sucks but im still gonna get it cuz of the multiple sides you can play as, can someone tell me if the dlc can be used in offline one player modes please, id really appreciate it, if you know then you can message me, thanks. anyways back on point the game reminds me of battlefront and dynasty warriors, it would be sick if the next one (if there is one) has assassind creed style combat. on a non related side note, i really wish we'd get battlefront 3 the trailers looked awesome but lucasfarts screwed us over just like with kotor 3.

  • kaliban

    Posted Apr 22, 2009 12:15 am PT

    for some reason I still really want to play this. I mean, I'm not even that big a fan of LOTR. Dunno what it is but I guess I'll rent it or something just to ease the urge and take it from there.

  • dan_151

    Posted Apr 18, 2009 12:24 pm PT

    battlefront is way better.

  • partyboy111

    Posted Apr 17, 2009 7:17 am PT

    Good point drill60.What is here hero deathmatch, in battlefront is assault with heroes in mos isley

  • H-bomb20

    Posted Apr 12, 2009 3:51 pm PT

    played the demo. freakin awesome. whooooo!

  • trystkl1826

    Posted Apr 6, 2009 10:59 pm PT

    He is an awesome reviewer.

  • hunkar

    Posted Apr 2, 2009 5:10 am PT

    is decent

  • halowarrior_117

    Posted Mar 28, 2009 3:27 am PT

    Feels and looks like battlefront but i still prefer the Star Wars genre just cause im a bigger fan of star wars

  • ScionofEntropy

    Posted Mar 12, 2009 8:20 pm PT

    This actually looks pretty entertaining. I hadn't heard much about the game, apart from seeing the review go up a while back, but I might have to check this out.

  • drill60

    Posted Mar 12, 2009 6:41 am PT

    its basically lord of the rings battlefront

  • soggywaffleman

    Posted Mar 8, 2009 11:37 am PT

    i think he makes it sound rly good with his enthusiasm, hense the contrasts of the review and the 6.5, but i also think that he just doens't want to get into all of the technical problems, cuz how much can u say about glitches? so he just focuses on other parts of the game, which happen to b very good

  • dennishachey

    Posted Mar 7, 2009 1:45 am PT

    JEST GOT THE PLATNUM FROM THIS GAME ITS GOOD

  • Jakiez

    Posted Feb 27, 2009 4:12 pm PT

    THIS is AWESOME plz download tha demo from tha playsion store before u judge it PLZ

  • faizsadasd

    Posted Feb 22, 2009 10:33 am PT

    this game is good but not worth its price i mean from play.com it costs 51euros.

  • paystation

    Posted Feb 22, 2009 3:44 am PT

    i got this game and its a 8.5 not 6.0

  • Nuaibh

    Posted Feb 21, 2009 7:25 pm PT

    This game is appeals to people depending on how they like games. I think the review can be misleading to some people but accurate to others. Its really a bundle of mixed feelings. I honestly like these types of games so i just ignored the score and bought the game

  • acerpg007

    Posted Feb 19, 2009 4:47 pm PT

    blah blah blah, GS gave this game a 6.5 and in this review they didn't even mention why this game got a low score..for me, this game is good..

  • TheoleDominion

    Posted Feb 17, 2009 5:13 am PT

    How can you barely say anything bad about the game and give it such a low score?

  • icebergstorm

    Posted Feb 17, 2009 4:23 am PT

    3rd person is NOT suck!! Just because you like 1st Person, doesn't mean other people only have to like one genre!! There are OTHER genres available to play you narrow-minded lil kiddo!! Go back to your room and play Halo 3 or other FPSs or sumthin!! Gears of War & Resident Evil 4 are NOT 1st person games, but they are regarded as some of the BEST GAMES ever created!! This LOTR game reminds me of the LOTR2 and 3 PS2 games, seem fun if you can play co op with someone online (I'd give it a 7 or 7.5 ... at least) ... and the reviewer needs not make it sound so good if he was going to give it a "6.5" ... more consistency, Chris!! You didn't even talk about "bad points" that made it a "6.5" ?? This is really a bad review, IMHO...

The Lord of the Rings: Conquest Quick Links

Summary | Reviews | News | Previews & Features | Images | Videos | Downloads | Answers | Hints & Cheats | Forum | Check Prices

The Lord of the Rings: Conquest Boxshot Enlarge the boxshot
The Lord of the Rings: Conquest

Game Stats

Full Game Details »Close
Also on

Games you may like…

Users who looked at content for this game also looked at these games.

See More Similar Games
advertisement