I don't understand why nVidia is always beaten by ATI.May be because of their early arrival show ATI the way how to outperformed and beat nVidia.But remember nVidia's card are more stable and efficient than ATi.Nvisia owe me nothing but i think nvidia is a true leader in graphic card.I think ATI can only win the battle just before nvidia's mighty 9800 series.This time i think nvidia will not easily be beaten by ATI.In 6 series 6800 lost the battle with ATI's X800 but in 7 series all ranges are storming away ATI's card.7800GTX shows he is a true leader followed by 7900GTX and 7950GX2.In mid-range 7900GS and 7600GT shows they are market leader.In lowend 7300GT and 7600GS are respected because of their HD power.This will happen again with 9800 series only timw will tell.

My specs are CPU-Core 2 Duo E6300 1.86Ghz (over-clocked @ 2.5Ghz)(sluggish) Memory-Corsair XMS DDR2-800 1GB X2 (over-clocked @ 900Mhz) Motherboard-MSI 680i P6n Diamond(has 4 PCI-express slot) Graphic card-Geforce 7300GT(funny isn't it) Sound card-Creative Sound Blaster X-Fi Xtreme HD 7.1 CH Audio(onboard) It runs fine at 1024x768-with all setting high,average FPS 34 but dropped to 25 at 1280x1024 I am saving money to upgrade my graphic card and CPU.Which CPU is better dual core or quad core? Which graphic card is better 8800GTX or a pair of 8800GTS?Do i need to upgrade my RAM

I think there are so many people who want play Ps2 games on ps3.since there is only a few ps3 titles available.when i bought xbox360 at launch there are many xbox games that can be played on 360.i can buy xbox games under 30$ and play on 360 when i don't want to spend 50$ on 360 games. I really hoped to play ps2 games on ps3 since i have so many ps2 disks and i don't want to spend 60$ on blue-ray ps3 games. when i heard many ps2 games can't be played on ps3 i decided to wait again as i did.