thenewau25's forum posts

Avatar image for thenewau25
thenewau25

2058

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

98

Followers

Reviews: 28

User Lists: 0

#1 thenewau25
Member since 2007 • 2058 Posts
[QUOTE="thenewau25"]

[QUOTE="October_Tide"]thenewau25 is a far cry 2 fanboy, just ignore every thing he says. If you mention another game he will say it's utterly crap comparred to FC2. October_Tide

october_tide why dont you post something in you profile to figiure if you are a crysis fanboy and everything i say about crysis is wrong cuz its a perferct game for you?, or why dont check that i was talking about stalker, you wanna ask me something ask me and am sure i can answer without fanboizym you calim jsut try out!

LOLOLOLOL here you go again. I didn't mention anything about Crysis and yet you bring it up lol. And yes I did see that you were talking about stalker from the endless posts of you saying how much it sucks like every other game in the world compared to far cry 2.

no i jsut assume people say i hate crysis while a rate warhead with an 8 and i dont got something against stalker i gave it a 7 to shadow of cherrobyl clear sky is much better, now about far cry 2? i think its better than stalker for bigger worldmap the story explains stuff also driving and buying stuff has a meaning, GUNS but in stalker no need for sidequests for bonus money that will be used for guns or amrors since there arent any extra expensive powerfull guns or equipment to buy, only generic ones the good ones you gotta progress the main missions so you can take them from masterstalkers after you kill them, cant find them in shops! About far cry 2? many people defend crysis for the flaws that they hate far cry 2 for, i dont get why all that unfairness so that flaw rocks in crysis but in far cry the same flaw turns the game bad? i dont get it why bashing far cry 2 for the same reasons many outher games can be bashed, its just like they expect to be better than anything but turn like a huge dissapoitment , or simply defend crysis cuz they hate they possubility that MIGHT a bette game comes out, eg that user said that stalker has a big worldmap, wrong everyouther game with a worldmap has bigger so its small, perhaps fable has smaller, so why to listen to him? i completed stalker 4 times and i know everything apart from artifact names and weapon names, so how can he say ma wrong on what i say? do you know of stalker? ask me something...

Avatar image for thenewau25
thenewau25

2058

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

98

Followers

Reviews: 28

User Lists: 0

#2 thenewau25
Member since 2007 • 2058 Posts

well id say some games like haze or fracture will have better luck if they wer also availble on pc, you cant find many good pc games, and i hope some games like eg battlefield bad company to come out on pc

about pc losing out compared to console resident evil 4 not even mouse support,

about deux ex yes they wreck invisivle war thanks to console crap

some games are not meant on pc like gears of war

finnaly the new prince of persia? why so cartoonish? they say they use next generation graphics not cell shaded

Avatar image for thenewau25
thenewau25

2058

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

98

Followers

Reviews: 28

User Lists: 0

#4 thenewau25
Member since 2007 • 2058 Posts

thenewau25 is a far cry 2 fanboy, just ignore every thing he says. If you mention another game he will say it's utterly crap comparred to FC2. October_Tide

october_tide why dont you post something in you profile to figiure if you are a crysis fanboy and everything i say about crysis is wrong cuz its a perferct game for you?, or why dont check that i was talking about stalker, you wanna ask me something ask me and am sure i can answer without fanboizym you calim jsut try out!

Avatar image for thenewau25
thenewau25

2058

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

98

Followers

Reviews: 28

User Lists: 0

#5 thenewau25
Member since 2007 • 2058 Posts
[QUOTE="thenewau25"][QUOTE="deathcy"]

Far Cry 2 is only graphics.

end of story :)

thanx

bedram793

... hahahahahahah lol so what crysis is?

lol again

in any case game is awesome enemie aint bulletproof just dont aim for the head to much also that it doesnt have much shootign is a good thing why to place hundrends of enemies in the worldmap under trees? no reason they should be in military bases 10 km away not everywhere, game is great it deserver more than an 8.5, is cod4 better that got a 9?

No it's not. It's a great game for many reasons, with graphics being one reason. How about the vehicles whose tires you can actually shoot? How about being able to destroy buildings? How about the amazing physics? How about being able to run over trees and shoot them down? How about the many ways you can finish a mission (stealth, all guns blazing, etc.)? How about an open ended single player game? Crysis Wars is also very very fun. To say it's all about graphics is a stupid remark. There are many reasons why Crysis is so great.

Also, just wanted to say, because of the different ways you can finish a mission, there is a lot of replay value. I have actually played the demo for 12 hours, and that's just the demo (think about all the other missions).

EXACTLY many people dont see those stuff in crysis like myself so yes those are great stuff but what happens if i wanna use only guns no powers or mods? i play far cry 2 the features that far cry has are diffirent and people who loved crysis or not even played it cant see them, eg how many fps got 50 km2 of worldmap? just for being that wide or burn the vegetation or the amount of guns i love it. oh i gotta tell you something crysis map aint that big id say, or as much freedom as the first level in demo, its not as open ended as the demo, you propably heard it, but crysis warhead is , gald we understand each outher!

An example in crysis using guns and relly in my shield will preserve a pretty bad experience but if a react tacticakk and examine the area and surroundings i cant shoot the truk fuel tank and blow the enitre enemy squad apart, unlikely in far cry 2 they decide to let you kill enemies with guns mostly i like that since crysis was refusing to play this way, and hey fps means you use guns, eg stalker, so its a good think i can relly in my guns in far cry 2 and not worry about my vehicle have a blown tire!

Avatar image for thenewau25
thenewau25

2058

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

98

Followers

Reviews: 28

User Lists: 0

#6 thenewau25
Member since 2007 • 2058 Posts
[QUOTE="sSubZerOo"][QUOTE="thenewau25"]

[QUOTE="SuperBeast"]GT is the site that refused to give Crysis the best graphics of the year award because of how demanding it was and it wouldn't be "fair" for the other games. Thats the day I stopped going to that site. chesterocks7

thats why i love these guys they dont care only about crysis ulike 80% of pc & mac forums

Lol thenew stop posting seriously, we arn't talking about the quality of the game we are talkinga bout its graphics.. Which is undeniable how good it looks REGARDLESS how much you despise it, and then hump the leg of Farcry 2.. :P

For real kid, you cannot deny that Crysis is the best looking game ever made, no matter how much you hate it. If you try to deny it, no one is going to take you seriously.

am no kid i dont deny being the most technical advanced in graphical section but graphics are a taste eg i dont give a damn about the way it looks ill go fo far cry 2 and fallout 3, but seriously the ONLY reason the graphics are so good is the high requirements that consoles can much, crysis has much higher requirements than outher games to max out, if every game had so good graphics then we gonna need better video cards, just like oblivion some years ago or far cry 1, few pcs can max them, so the fact crysis or whatever outher game comes out EXCLUSIVLY on pc and has the best graphics, is cheating in competition by settings the standards too high, dont you think that they could do the same with eg far cry 2 or fallout 3, IF they werent so wide and open worldmap games, and IF they were only in pc? eg doom 3 was a pc exclusive that still you need an 8800 to max out even the 16X antialising, so simply doom 3 had so good graphics cuz it require a pc from feature, thats what fear did, and came out later in x360 that it was "possible to work with so good graphics in a console" ,NOT ON RELEASE BUT LATER! thats what crysis does and thats what doom did tey set graphics too high eg brother in arms came after a year from doom 3, but the graphics were a joke compared to doom 3, but still considered great , DUH, see jsut like chronicles or riddick amazing graphics but few know of the game so outher games considered as great graphics, thats why gt didn give it the reward because it did the same as far cry that came before doom 3, they gave as graphics that "back then" most of us couldnt handle, the term great graphics somes with great optimization in consoles, so having a greater pc made to get those graphics, eg the vista dx10 excuse made it like comparing a Plasystation 4 to x360, so crysis was so superior that it demanded a next generation system that consoles though as impossible, crysis graphics were too good so good that requiere to compare the game for the xbox console and not x360, crysis was way too good to win the award, its a pure winner not a compettitor since its superior so they keep it away from compatition and compare the equal technology games, every heard of weight category? you dont let someone weight 120 kg to fight with outhers that weight about 50 -80 kg!

Avatar image for thenewau25
thenewau25

2058

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

98

Followers

Reviews: 28

User Lists: 0

#7 thenewau25
Member since 2007 • 2058 Posts
[QUOTE="thenewau25"]

[QUOTE="SuperBeast"]GT is the site that refused to give Crysis the best graphics of the year award because of how demanding it was and it wouldn't be "fair" for the other games. Thats the day I stopped going to that site. sSubZerOo

thats why i love these guys they dont care only about crysis ulike 80% of pc & mac forums

Lol thenew stop posting seriously, we arn't talking about the quality of the game we are talkinga bout its graphics.. Which is undeniable how good it looks REGARDLESS how much you despise it, and then hump the leg of Farcry 2.. :P

ever wonder why crysis aint on consoles? graphics, why far cry 2 and fallout 3 dont claim the graphics award? console limits, blme consoles and how superior is crysis compared to them in graphics!

Avatar image for thenewau25
thenewau25

2058

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

98

Followers

Reviews: 28

User Lists: 0

#8 thenewau25
Member since 2007 • 2058 Posts

What the hell did you do with your time before FC2 came out?chesterocks7

Am sorry i dont get that are you insulting me? look this game has much ,much ,much bigger map than stalker, driving more belivable story that explains something and also you got the buddies, more faction focuzed id say so its better than stalker for me!

Avatar image for thenewau25
thenewau25

2058

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

98

Followers

Reviews: 28

User Lists: 0

#9 thenewau25
Member since 2007 • 2058 Posts
[QUOTE="thenewau25"][QUOTE="chesterocks7"][QUOTE="thenewau25"]

i ll reply the same way the sidemissions in stalker are random and endless find the artifact, kill those guys, you can do em like forever, 40 hours? ok amin story only plz? an also paly far cry 2 by exploring and doing the main story and side missions and i doubt it will be less than 20 hours, especially if you drive, which you do alot and i love it because this is how it supose to do huge belivalbe areas, but stalker? i can had;y belive that this forward progression "move on to the next level" is as open ended as eg postal 2 boiling point or oblivion, i thought you ll be able to get lost in a wide enviroment like google earth shows chernobyl, or like fallout 3 but the worldmap was a joke and the time to complete too for a game in a 5 years of development but instead of add stuff they delete them like they deleted dead city, I WANTED TO PLAY IN A BIG CITY! Thank god there is oblivion lsot mod, with the original guns too, another thing is the few monsters or the rusehe encyclopedia which misses stuff and the shops suck hard, you gor money but not much to buy, you got more money but not something great to reward you for doing extra quests, also they remove the skills and the WHEN you acquire armor , well its just unbalanced, not very helpfull to give you armor so late or decen guns, or ammo, while militray commandos are attacking you, but opps no decent stuff to match them its much later on a 7.5 on my book much more on ffar cry 2 for fixing those issues!

chesterocks7

The side missions in STALKER are far more varied than the side missions in FC2. There are two types of side missions in FC2: Blow up a convoy, kill a target. There are a whole lot more in STALKER. And the side missions in STALKER are far more rewarding. There are all sorts of weapons, artifacts, and suits that you can get as rewards, whereas FC2 all you ever get is diamonds. There are just as many guns in STALKER as in FC2 so the fact that you get artifacts and suits, plus some weapon upgrades, makes STALKER's side missions far more rewarding. And how is STALKER's areas not believeable? You do realize that most of the areas in STALKER are modeled after the actual Zone of Alienation right? And I don't get where you say there is money but not much to buy? There are far more items to buy in STALKER (guns, gun mods, artifacts, suits, food) than in FC2. And you must not have tried to play the game at all, because the gear you have available to you at every level is definitely sufficient to take on the enemies you face in that level. Hell you can get a Merc Suit in the beginners camp you start in, and if anything that gives you an unfair advantage over your enemies. I can understand why you love FC2, I absolutely love it as well. But you're really proving yourself to just be an obnoxious fanboy by spitting out there flat out lies about other games.

am startinng to think you havent played stalker? ok by normal means no secret in the first camp or in stalker hideout you find the stalker suit in the bar, you get it for free, till then the unbalancement in killing you badly, about the map, google earth dissagrees, the new areas in stalker clear sky dont explain much, how did they appear or why the limit the map so much and remove levels, as for the 3 shops the trader has nothing, only basic food and 8mm ammo the 8mm pistol and sawed off shotgun with few sells, while when killing enemies you get dozen of that basic stuff and sel them, " here trader get some stuff cuz you got NOTHING" also the trader in bar has the walker pistol the stalker suit and ak 74, the yantar has thes scientict suits the shotgun and gronza ( id dont remeber its stalker name, "ts onz" ithink SO anyone got 5.56 ammo to buy? amror piercing for some HARD EARNED CASH? a exoskeleton suit, for a load of money? or a .... how you call the silenced rifle? or sniper rifles or the fn 2000 (the scoped rilfe with grenade laucher) NO NOBODY, infact you gonna have to find those stuff by killing masterstalkers and collect 5.56 ammo till all enemies you face are really good and use the g36k so you get ammo easy, and not having a 5.56 weapon while they use a poor ak 74 with 7.62, that you use too to save 5.56 ammo cuz you dont get till you reach the wild area (where the mercs are) mostly there is no reason to do sidequests to earn cash, you get better stuff if you complete the main story and not waste time in sidequests, now exploring, will get you something, like artifacts with high radioenergy or a radiocative exoskeleton, bust some of them are good, so no reason to collect cash, but in far cry more diamonds better guns, now if you think that its sufficient or you can kill anyone in facr cry 2 with a bad gun thats you being good, the point is balanced upgrading and in stalker i see no reason to save cash since they arent any expensive great guns or armors available, that i dint get all the 4 times i completed the game, and i explore anything find the extra stuff and easter eggs, which proved that worldmap is so small and linear, why cant i go and free roam in a city or some wide plains instead of keep pressing to pipiyat and chernobyl npp, or the factions are too fake you can might as well screw them both and join no one enter the military base kill them all and keep moving, not much of faction joining! Everything i said was true not a lie!

Ok from what I could make out of that paragraph, you haven't played STALKER, because if you have, you would realize how many falsehoods you are spewing out. But I'm not going to bother correcting them because it's obviously impossible to have a legitimate debate with you.

I COMPLETED THE GAME 4 TIMES? HAVE YOU PLAYED IT AT ALL? ASK ME WHATEVER YOU WANT just not weapon names, i can remeber that in wild territory there is an easter egg about gordon freeman and big ben gun SEE I PLAYED IT!

Avatar image for thenewau25
thenewau25

2058

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

98

Followers

Reviews: 28

User Lists: 0

#10 thenewau25
Member since 2007 • 2058 Posts

[QUOTE="ZuluEcho14"]No... it's not Fallout... but I don't really care.smerlus

You're right. It's not Fallout. It's a continuation of the Fallout canon and much better in numerous ways like combat, graphics, AI, and immersion.

OK do you think that fallout tactics is a more worthy to be called fallout than this ZuluEcho14?

seriously tactics wasnt that deep in rpg so for me its mor a singleplayer rpg that tactical game with rpg elements!