Okok ppl..ps4 is a pure gaming machine. I'm not crossing out ps4 entirely, im just stating my opinion that I favor x1 a bit more. I just like the OSes in x1, and technology advances with the kinect.
I'm looking for the stuffs i'm gonna get with the price i paid. In australia ps4 and x1 are $549 and $599 different only.
And pls stop saying being spied on..firstly nobody wants to spy on u..2ndly there's indication light to show its on..3rd ly, u can turn it away if it so bothers u.
I duno people..im no xbox / MS fans..but i do think ps4 has no innovation. It is basically a mid-range PC, nothing much special about it.
xbox1 on the other hand actually interests me more, it seems they spend more time and research on this console. Especially the kinect, and the software and functionality of x1 is so much more ahead of ps4. Sorry i'm no fan of any, but in my humble opinion, i believe x1 is the nx gen and future proof console. Whereas ps4 is just an upgraded system..i just don't think it's any special
Microsoft approach this studio and provide the funding to make this game, of course xbox1 get the exclusive first. Sony could have approach them first, but they didn't..so stop whinning
@ica728 - Obviously, u are a fanboy, u duno about technologies, ur words r meaningless, no offense. Graphics on PC are always more superior than consoles in every way, the only difference that people prefer consoles (including me) is the price. The price u paid to have ur pc churn out good graphics quality and performance is about triple the price u paid for a console. Consoles will always be weaker than PCs (get over with it), the only reason that it's graphics are almost on par with PC is that all consoles have specific hardwares for devs to develop games on which is more easier compared to PC which has variety of hardwares between different users.
Well, wad i can see: Phenom II is backward compatible with the AM2+ motherboards, cheaper, and consumes much lesser power (i thk it's the first time AMD ever done that, normally AMD processors sucks at power saving). Other than that, Intel still leads AMD by...about 1 year time? Let's hope they can catch up.
I guess they compared with the older down-clocked core 2 processor cos of the similar price. how can they compare with intel i7, it runs on DDR3 of course it will score better
synclorize's comments