Seriously, how many times does he have to say it before people get the message?Eman5805

Touche (I think).

[QUOTE="johnnythegamer2"]LOL, no it should overheat, and catch flames...then the number 33% should fly out like everywhere, and then they put it in the PS3 and then the demo starts up :D.manny203

hahahaha that would be so funny to see

I second that

Yeah one of the worst things to happen to the PS3 was the loss of some big exclusives, or at the least timed exclusive titles, because now some people have this dumb notion that Sony is totally incapable keeping certain games exclusive to there platform.Shadowhawk2606

Yeah I thought it was horribly annoying when they said Assasin's Creed wasn't PS3 exclusive anymore.

[QUOTE="GastaS"]

I stop belive Sony workers or devs, how can you guys still belive all that crap b***s*** that is been said about the cell?!

Last gen we all knew that xbox was more powerfull than PS2 and it proved to be more on every multiplatform game.

Sony showed graphs on E3-05 saying that the Cell is twice powerfull x360 processor but we all know that this is not what is happening on multiplatform games.

the only true thing that sony said about the PS3 is that the blue-ray hold more space than DVD.

Warrior_Poet

well for one most of the multiplats were coded for the 360 then ported...

but if one of the best PS3 dev's are only managing to get 30% of the power out of the Cell...even though it is technically twice as powerful if you can only harness 30% of it there is you answer right there

Your answer is confusing to me. Are you saying that it is, or it is NOT twice as powerful as X360?

I don't seem to be thinking about this the way quite a lot of you are. You're all saying things like "It must be rubbish if it's only a %30 game" (don't forget that they did say it would be %50 by the time it's finished).

But when I saw that video I was thinking "If that's only %30, %100 is going to be like having multiple chain orgasms!". Holy **** that game looks awesome.

I think if Killzone 2 is going to be the "Halo Killer", it's going to need a good story (I reckon it does), good graphics (this is up to the developer really, but it's on PS3 with a 52GB disk, I hope they don't get lazy like most other PS3 games are with graphics), game play (it already has this), and finally, MULTI-PLAYER!! It can't win without it, since Halo has online.

They should also start releasing more videos/previews of it, if they're going to sway people over from other games, they're going to need to blow out their minds with amazing videos before people will even think of buying the game (unless they already know about it).

Isn't $200 the mass market price where systems are supposed to sell really well? It seems like you sort of just picked a number out of a hat... I bet we'd all own all of the systems if they were less expensive. After all, everyone here likes gaming, right?bulb_or_parrot

Yeah, my mate already has an Xbox 360 and a Wii, and for doing well in his SATs his parents are buying hum a PS3!! They're not even that rich. I love my PS3, I got one on launch day in UK. If everone saw it the way I saw it, you wouldn't care how much it costs (unless it's over £800, of course). It's just that almost all the launch games were either too crappy or too short. Can't wait for Skate and LittleBigPlanet.