So i have to say, i'm pretty pysched on the new red dead. Looks amazing and i've heard nothing but good things from it. Definitely going to buy it. I have one problem though. Why is it that it recieved below a 10 on all sites and raters when they say it is a better game the it's predecessor gta iv?
To me when you say a game is better than another game than it is, plain and simple. I'm not going to take in account that "for it's time" it makes no sense to say one is better than another and "label" or "score" the latter better. When i get this game i'll be the judge, and then i'll know if it's truly a 9.5.