@Pedro said:

@scatteh316 said:

Looks like they improved the ray tracing too with objects that were previously missing in reflections now being reflected.

So, they weren't using ray tracing in the first showing but people were WOWED by its ray tracing? 😂

Of course it was using RT in the first showing.........it was just missing geometry in the BVH 🤦‍♂️

Looks like they improved the ray tracing too with objects that were previously missing in reflections now being reflected.

You're still passing off your opinion and straw grasping as fact.

Unless you have hard evidence to suggest they'll get delayed or not release in the 1st year then you have no point or argument.

Poor little lemming, can't catch a break.

Once again you have provided your opinion and are trying to pass it off as a fact.

You have not provided any evidence, at all, that these games will not be released within the 1st year to combat the evidence that says they will.

If you like I can provide you with the Xbox customer services email so you can direct your anger of having no games to them?

All games have been confirmed by developers to be coming within the first 12 months of PS5's release, links have been provided to you on the first page I believe.

No where have I mentioned or even talked about Nintendo's games so that point is irrelevant and retarded.

GT on PS5 is looking like a simple port of a PS4 game with some enhancements, nothing that requires years and years of work.

Phil Spencer has been saying the games are coming now for the last 4 years, you can make a AAA game in 4 years so we should be seeing them by now but instead there's nothing but tumbleweed coming from Microsoft's 1st party studio's.

And no where have you provided facts, only the retarded opinion of a butt hurt fan boy who can not cope with the FACT that once again Microsoft have been made to be Sony's bitch.

Only an idiot would try to argue that a Gran Turismo, Spiderman, Ratchet & Clank, Demon Souls and a new Horizon game all within the first 12 months is bad.

Seeing as you asked:

No GPU scales 100% perfectly, so the 18% advantage Series-X has theoretically will be lucky to get to 10% in the real world.

The CPU is only 100mhz faster with SMT enabled and 300mhz faster with it disabled, but with SMT adding 30% (using PC test results) developers would be stupid to not use it

We still don't know how much memory and CPU performance PS5's OS uses, Series-X looses a whole CPU core to the OS so if the rumours of PS5 being able to dump it's whole OS in to the stupid fast SSD when switching to a game are true then PS5 will have an extra core for gaming over Series-X.

The back end, Mark Cerny is absolutely correct when he said it's easier to keep a smaller amount of CU's busy with work then it is a load of them. CU's are always never 100% utilized which is why a-sync compute came around to use up them when the game wasn't.

Also relating the back end, fill rate, texel rate, texturing, geometry set-up is all likely to be faster on PS5 due to the higher clock speed .

The SSD can pull data in quick enough to enable a whole new method of culling, saving a huge chuck of objects being drawn outside of the players frustrum and freeing up a lot of resources. Series-X's SSD is NO WHERE CLOSE TO PS5's.....

Having to damage control because BASE PS5 isn't far off the ENHANCED next-gen Xbox is laughable as there IS a Series-S and people are going to look very silly when it releases at it's rumored 6tflops......only for Sony to release a 20tflop PS5 Pro a few years from now.

Only idiots thought it wouldn't work with all games as Mark Cerny never said it was just 100 games....

If designed for PS5 it would not load in 3-4 seconds but instantly.

Who damage controlling? And CU has nothing to do with it, the example was to show that having extra shaders doesn't translate to better performance if you don't have the back end throughput to support it.