Plus, if Blueray fails like Betamax and HD-DVD wins, then u have an overpriced console that uses disks for games that never even get close to being filled. I really don't know which one will actually win, but UMD is already failing since u can only play them on the small screen that is the PSP.

I quote: Sony: Harrison, “The PlayStation 3 is a computer. We do not need the PC.“ Plus, there's always the possibility that no game that you didn't personally buy will even work on your PS3. Sony hasn't commented, but they do have the patent. Microsoft: Peter Moore, "Nobody is concerned anymore about backwards compatibility. We under promised and over delivered on that. It's a very complicated thing... very complex work. I'm just stunned that we have hundreds of games that are backwards compatible. He added: "more are coming, but at some point, you just go, there's enough, let's move on, or people aren't as worried about a game being backwards compatible - and I like to think we've upheld our end of the bargain in making at least two or maybe three hundred games backwards compat." Nintendo: The once aptly named Revolution is now Wii. There was never a problem with the old name and this one is gay, but its grown on me and is the only beef towards Nintendo other than no true HD support, but that will only enable developers to make games more affordable for them and us. So, in conclusion, based on these negatives as well as a few others the order of legitimacy goes like this: 1.Nintendo 2.Microsoft 3.Sony