punchultimate's forum posts

Avatar image for punchultimate
punchultimate

138

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#1 punchultimate
Member since 2009 • 138 Posts

Think of it this way, how many big selling, crazy popular titles did Sony bring over from the PS2 to the PS3?

Ratchet? MGS? GoW? None of these come anywhere near the popularity of Halo or Mario. In fact, the only thing Sony has that's anything like those games is GT5, which is taking its sweet time to come out.

Of course, that doesn't explain why games like GeoW (new IPs) sold more then anything on the on PS3. It could be price, advertising, public appeal, etc, but basically, games don't sell on the PS3 and its pretty strange...

hell if i know why :P

Mr_Apple_Soup

God of War is as popular if not more popular with the PS3 owners, as Halo is with 360 owners. Mario beats every other game in popularity because he's been around so long that you really cant miss him. He's always been nintendo's flagship title and almost every mario game is good if not awesome

Avatar image for punchultimate
punchultimate

138

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#2 punchultimate
Member since 2009 • 138 Posts

[QUOTE="SergeAndKid"][QUOTE="Blazerdt47"] Apparently he did miss the Uncharted and MGS4 thing. And last i checked Quality>Quantity. So your excuse to why an expansion outsold KZ2 is worthless.Blazerdt47

And ODST IS quality therefore you're opinion is invalid. an expansion outsold KZ2, a game that took 14 months to make versus one that took 4 years, scored the same on this site and ODST owns it sales wise, ODST wins

ODST is better quality???? Killzone 2 has been vastly improved from it's lacking prequel. What different has ODST accomplished?

i have to agree. even xbox/halo fans were dissapointed in ODST, mostly because it was 5 hours long and still $60. I say thats a kick in the face to the fans of the game. and i think this site's review was bogus and bias. its time for halo to retire.

Avatar image for punchultimate
punchultimate

138

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#3 punchultimate
Member since 2009 • 138 Posts

1. Most reasonable people realize they're =.

2. Killzone2 is the best looking console game right now, I don't know many who dispute that. I think uncharted 2 however isn't any better looking than gears 2.

3.Right now there are obviously a lot more ps3 fanboys in this forum judging from so many topics like this being made, so they're going to be louder in shouting down alternative opinions.

topgunmv

Uncharted 2 is a lot better looking than gears 2. this is partly because of how long Naughty Dog worked on Uncharted 2 and how much more recent it is than Gears 2. I dont mean to be mean but almost everyone will tell you the same thing.

Avatar image for punchultimate
punchultimate

138

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#4 punchultimate
Member since 2009 • 138 Posts

So I keep reading all these things about how the PS3 versions of games don't look as good as the 360 versions. There's a simple explanation: it's because the third party titles are made on the 360 and then ported to the PS3. Now, the graphics situation is true for third party titles but not so for first party titles. I don't quite think it's fair for developers to do this to the playstation. The PS3 has a weaker CPU but multiple SPUs. Anyone who watched any of the press stuff for Uncharted 2 knows this. Along with the more powerful CPU, the 360 also still works on DVDs, and PS3 is on Blu-ray (also a common fact). My problem is that the uninformed gamer will just say, "AW dang! the PS3 version doesn't look as good? I'm getting a 360." This is a problem because developers are extremely hindering the possible sales of the PS3 because they only port to it. If one developer would program intelligently for the PS3(like bioware did with Dragon Age), then port that to the 360, I think it would be a different story. What do you guys think?

Avatar image for punchultimate
punchultimate

138

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#5 punchultimate
Member since 2009 • 138 Posts

So I keep reading all these things about how the PS3 versions of games don't look as good as the 360 versions. There's a simple explanation: it's because the third party titles are made on the 360 and then ported to the PS3. Now, the graphics situation is true for third party titles but not so for first party titles. I don't quite think it's fair for developers to do this to the playstation. The PS3 has a weaker CPU but multiple SPUs. Anyone who watched any of the press stuff for Uncharted 2 knows this. Along with the more powerful CPU, the 360 also still works on DVDs, and PS3 is on Blu-ray (also a common fact). My problem is that the uninformed gamer will just say, "AW dang! the PS3 version doesn't look as good? I'm getting a 360." This is a problem because developers are extremely hindering the possible sales of the PS3 because they only port to it. If one developer would program intelligently for the PS3(like bioware did with Dragon Age), then port that to the 360, I think it would be a different story. What do you guys think?

Avatar image for punchultimate
punchultimate

138

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#6 punchultimate
Member since 2009 • 138 Posts

the gamespot review said that the PC version played and looked the best, but that the ps3 was second. They said the textures were better than 360, but that there were a few glitches and frame rate drops. It doesn't make it unplayable.

Avatar image for punchultimate
punchultimate

138

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#7 punchultimate
Member since 2009 • 138 Posts

they would have to go through like a hundred more updates in two months to get to 4.00, but 3.01 might be on the way soon.

Avatar image for punchultimate
punchultimate

138

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#8 punchultimate
Member since 2009 • 138 Posts

Well I still haven't had any problems with the 60gb version. But I plan on buying at least a 120gb slim, and now the 250's out so idk.

Avatar image for punchultimate
punchultimate

138

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#9 punchultimate
Member since 2009 • 138 Posts

250 is a good number. I have a 60 and i put all of the dr. who episodes i had on it (51 episodes 45[ish] minutes a peice) and 31 episodes of another 24 min show and i have about 3g left. Not to mention the games i have installed which are actually quite small. But without the vids i'd have almost 40g, and i have quite a few games on there so yeah. I think the only reason the ps3 fills up faster is because you can save any video and/or music file that you want and its compatable, so 250's a good number.

Avatar image for punchultimate
punchultimate

138

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#10 punchultimate
Member since 2009 • 138 Posts

dammit, lol I just saw furi with a bayonetta avatar and sig (well at least its better than having haze on your sig)

its a pic which I had already looked a couple of months ago, from bayonetta, I would just like to say that I HATE games like bayonetta, its a game developed by a team consisting of pervs and 0 women

they make a "hot" character for the game, so that way 90% of the people will buy the game just because the girl on it it's hot, I mean, just look at some of the pics, the game is certainly a man's wet dream, full of guns, swords, and girls with inhuman proportions, I just cant stand games like this! just like when they actually made lady from DMC look like a **** in DMC4!

I mean I have no problem against female characters, but why cant they just do regular girl characters? im not saying that they should make flat girls, who actually look like men, yeah we all know that girls have breast, no problem in making detailed breast on the videogame female characters, but at least try to make them look HUMAN and not something like a triple D!

ninja gaiden sigma 2 couldn't fell lower when they added the "bouncing bewbs feature" for mere merchandising!

say no to games with "the bayonetta factor"!!!

lightleggy

Hey calm down i know it sucks sometimes b/c it just perpetuates the idea that all gamers do is drool over these ridiculously perfectly sculpted women, but check out uncharted and uncharted 2. the women have clothes on! haha. but yeah im still kinda excited about bayonetta because the guy who did DMC did this one too. but yeah this is a problem with the video game industry i agree.