nuke_rochill's forum posts

  • 18 results
  • 1
  • 2
Avatar image for nuke_rochill
nuke_rochill

25

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#1 nuke_rochill
Member since 2005 • 25 Posts

Hardcore "Pro-life" activists need to change their perspective for the better. Dr. Tiller did what he had to because he understood the implications of foetuses with genetic defects like trisomy 18, diseases associated with nueral tube malformations, hydroencephaly etc There is absolutely no hope for foetuses with such genetic defects as modern medicine has no definite cure or procedures to correct these abnormalities, no doubt alot of research is going on with this regard but the prospects of the foetus surviving after delivery are nil without the use of extensive life support systems. There is no question of a "normal" life. Expecting mothers who recieve the cruel news are burdened with the choice of going ahead with the pregnancy only to see their child die, either that or to abort. Many couples choose to abort the pregnancy as they feel that its a battle lost. They have no choice!! Unfortunately, there are again couples with healthy foetuses who choose to abort maybe due to financial difficulties, or emotional unstability, whatever the reason, these are the people that "pro-life" activists need to convince not to abort their child. And the doctors who choose to go ahead with such abortions are either financially desperate or have no sense of human life. There is a difference between aborting a absolutely healthy foetus and a genetically malformed one.

I deeply sympathise with Dr. Tiller's family.

Avatar image for nuke_rochill
nuke_rochill

25

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#2 nuke_rochill
Member since 2005 • 25 Posts

If you're going to use Wikipedia for a source, then allow me to retort.

Also, humans have been to the moon six times.

lol, conspiracy theorists.

Theokhoth

I can understand you're opinion, but I'm afraid you'vemisunderstood me. I've used Wikipedia as a source for the definition of the Van Allen radiation belts. My emphasis is the radiation man would have to withstand in order to get past the belt, like I've said before, with the current technology available, its near impossible to get past those belts without exposure to extremely high radioactive particles. As you must be aware, cancer and genetic mutations of such exposures are inevitable!

There is also a term "solar wind/ blast" please do bother to investigate for yourself. I' am a medical student and I'm well aware of the causes of cancer and effects of radioactive exposure. Also, yes, man supposedly went to the moon six times, unfortunately it was all faked.

For your curiosity's sake, satellite imagery of Area 51 has shown distinct landscape pattern similar to the supposed "moon" lunar surface as was shown by NASA in their photographs.

There are plenty of inconsistencies, please do bother to investigate the matter personally to verify it.

Avatar image for nuke_rochill
nuke_rochill

25

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#3 nuke_rochill
Member since 2005 • 25 Posts

So, need more interesting facts? Please do bother to do a bit of research.

I'm convinced that man hasn't been to the moon, and to think that NASA shammed the world is incredibly insulting and infuriating.

"One small step for man, a giant hoax for mankind".

Avatar image for nuke_rochill
nuke_rochill

25

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#4 nuke_rochill
Member since 2005 • 25 Posts

A dominant factor to consider the Moon Mission as a hoax would be that of the The Van Allen radiation belt. (Source: Wikipedia)

'It is a torus of energetic charged particles (plasma) around Earth, which is held in place by Earth's magnetic field. This field is not uniformly distributed around the Earth. On the sunward side, it is compressed because of the solar wind, while on the other side it is elongated to around three earth radii. This creates a cavity called the Chapman Ferraro Cavity, in which the Van Allen radiation belt resides. It is split into two distinct belts, with energetic electrons forming the outer belt and a combination of protons and electrons creating the inner belt. In addition, the belts contain lesser amounts of other nuclei, such as alpha particles. The Van Allen belts are closely related to the polar aurora where particles strike the upper atmosphere and fluoresce.

Prior to the Space Age, the possibility of trapped charged particles had been investigated by Kristian Birkeland, Carl Størmer, and Nicholas Christofilos. The existence of the belt was confirmed by the Explorer 1 and Explorer 3 missions in early 1958, under Dr James Van Allen at the University of Iowa. The trapped radiation was first mapped out by Sputnik 3, Explorer 4, Pioneer 3 and Luna 1.

The term Van Allen belts refers specifically to the radiation belts surrounding Earth; however, similar radiation belts have been discovered around other planets. The Sun does not support long-term radiation belts. The Earth's atmosphere limits the belts' particles to regions above 200–1,000km, while the belts do not extend past 7 Earth radii RE. The belts are confined to an area which extends about 65° from the celestial equator.'

Read the implications of this radiation belt,

Impact on space travel:

Solar cells, integrated circuits, and sensors can be damaged by radiation. Geomagnetic storms occasionally damage electronic components on spacecraft. Miniaturization and digitization of electronics and logic circuits have made satellites more vulnerable to radiation, as incoming ions may be as large as the circuit's charge. Electronics on satellites must be hardened against radiation to operate reliably. The Hubble Space Telescope, among other satellites, often has its sensors turned off when passing through regions of intense radiation.

Missions beyond low earth orbit leave the protection of the geomagnetic field, and transit the Van Allen belts. Thus they may need to be shielded against exposure to cosmic rays, Van Allen radiation, or solar flares. The region between two to three earth radii lies between the two radiation belts and is sometimes referred to as the "safe zone".

An astronaut shielded by 3 mm of aluminium in an elliptic orbit passing through the radiation belt will receive about 2,500 rem (25 Sv) per year.

The last bit is particularly interesting as that would mean that none of the astronauts sent to the "moon" would have survived the trip. But that doesn't minus the fact that as many as 13 of NASA's astronauts involved in the moon mission "died" of mysterious "accidents".

Avatar image for nuke_rochill
nuke_rochill

25

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#5 nuke_rochill
Member since 2005 • 25 Posts

If that's true, then the play is obviously unrehearsed. Head_of_games

Not quite, apparently NASA made a mess of the so called evidence to prove the moon mission. Photographic evidence provided by NASA has multiple inconsistencies and "errors". It was a rehearsed play, scarred by the fact that NASA failed to execute it as planned.

Believe me, its not easy to send man to the moon. Why do you think no other country in the world to date has sent "man to the moon" after NASA's Apollo missions? Because the logistics are near impossible to deal with the current technology available. Read: Dangers of Space.

Avatar image for nuke_rochill
nuke_rochill

25

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#6 nuke_rochill
Member since 2005 • 25 Posts

Hey that's a quote from shakespeare, i'm surprised that no one figured that out yet.

twilightpanda

Absolutely, its a figure of speech. From the play "As you like it", by William Shakespear.

Avatar image for nuke_rochill
nuke_rochill

25

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#7 nuke_rochill
Member since 2005 • 25 Posts

Alright, since most of you are cueless, allow me to begin an interesting topic.

NASA never really sent man to the moon, it was a big hoax. I'm not joking, the implications of sending man to the moon are severe, not easy to achieve. No wonder NASA intends to send man to the moon by A.D 2020 as technology by then would be advanced or developed sufficiently to achieve the moon mission. Please do a bit of research yourself if you dont believe me, everything that happens(no exceptions) has it's reasons.

Avatar image for nuke_rochill
nuke_rochill

25

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#8 nuke_rochill
Member since 2005 • 25 Posts

"All the world's a stage".

Agree or otherwise? Remember there are literally hundreds of burning lies revealed by "conspiracy hunters", for me I'am wondering whether we ever landed on the moon.

**Disclaimer: Opinions posted here are solely out of curiosity, and for the need of clarification. Members are encouraged to be open minded.**

Avatar image for nuke_rochill
nuke_rochill

25

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#9 nuke_rochill
Member since 2005 • 25 Posts

Ne xu xani nai.

Better late then never.

Avatar image for nuke_rochill
nuke_rochill

25

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#10 nuke_rochill
Member since 2005 • 25 Posts

If we gamers ponder on the notion that in the not too distant future games will not only be a source of entertainment but also bring about a definite positive change in society, its not far fetched.

Then again think about the "dark side", integration of gaming modules into military equipments allows soldiers to control unmanned vehicles.. like never before, not to mention the proliferation of such kind of technology may one day turn into wars being fought "virtually". As crazy as it may sound, the demands of today's gamers will play a prominent role. Think about it.

  • 18 results
  • 1
  • 2