nomsayin's forum posts

#1 Edited by nomsayin (1346 posts) -

@toast_burner said:

@nomsayin said:
@toast_burner said:

To oppose homosexuality is to oppose love. To oppose love is to oppose god.

The love God has for someone and the love one should have for God, is much stronger (and is quite different) than the love people experience with each other. (from a religious perspective)

How can you claim to love god when you hate what god created? Why should god accept you when your heart is full of the most impure of all feelings?

Hate the sin, not the sinner

#2 Posted by nomsayin (1346 posts) -
@toast_burner said:

To oppose homosexuality is to oppose love. To oppose love is to oppose god.

The love God has for someone and the love one should have for God, is much stronger (and is quite different) than the love people experience with each other. (from a religious perspective)

#3 Posted by nomsayin (1346 posts) -

Good sh*t.

#4 Posted by nomsayin (1346 posts) -
@worlock77 said:

They also get most of their retail stock of cheap shit from China. China which has an absolutely atrocious record of human rights, is one of the worst nations in the world when it comes to child labor, has pretty much no freedom of religion, and essentially forces its citizens to have abortions (to the tune of like 30 million abortions performed in China per year). Religious convictions my ass.

Most stores get their sh*t from China. Why do you continue to buy products made from there then?

#5 Edited by nomsayin (1346 posts) -

I'd assume conservatives would be more motivated/hard working, while liberals would probably be better at empathizing with others.

@Jankarcop said:

Red states all have a far lower IQ.

Hate when idiots say this - it's not as clear cut w/ regards to the liberal/conservative dichotomy. Red states also have the highest African American population by % in the U.S., and African Americans tend to score lower on IQ tests, due to environmental factors/discrimination etc. African Americans, incidentally, also tend to vote Democrat.

#6 Posted by nomsayin (1346 posts) -

I'd assume conservatives would be more motivated/hard working, while liberals would probably be better at empathizing with others.

#7 Edited by nomsayin (1346 posts) -
@toast_burner said:
@SolidSnake35 said:

What's there to be proud of? Be proud of your accomplishments or shut up.

It's because there are so many homophobic people in the world you are taught to be ashamed of your sexuality. They mean pride as in not being ashamed.

Taught to be ashamed of your sexuality? Seriously? Which is clearly why huge orgyfests like gay parades exist right? Surely these openly gay people f-ing each other in public are "ashamed" of their sexuality. Stop pulling stuff out of your ass (pun intended).

#8 Posted by nomsayin (1346 posts) -

@thegerg said:

@nomsayin said:

@thegerg said:

@nomsayin said:

@toast_burner said:

@ariabed said:

@korvus: I would just be curious to see how he acts that's all, I know how I would be in a locker room full of girls, so it's gotta be kinda the same for him. I think he would have to be very careful where he is looking.

Not all gays are uncontrollable sex maniacs. Just because you can't control yourself around girls doesn't mean everyone is like that.

which explains why gays have the highest rate of contraction of STD's like HIV. You guys are always down to f*ck

There are quite a few factors to consider, it's not as simple as you might think.

What factors? Is it education? Because, at least in America, gays tend to earn above average in terms of income and, iirc, are more educated than the average American.

Fact of the matter is, gays tend to be highly promiscuous.

One factor is simply the nature of gay sex.

Anal sex is sometimes practiced by heterosexuals. Another, more important and significant factor is that gays are more promiscuous - as i stated previously.

#9 Posted by nomsayin (1346 posts) -

@thegerg said:

@nomsayin said:

@toast_burner said:

@ariabed said:

@korvus: I would just be curious to see how he acts that's all, I know how I would be in a locker room full of girls, so it's gotta be kinda the same for him. I think he would have to be very careful where he is looking.

Not all gays are uncontrollable sex maniacs. Just because you can't control yourself around girls doesn't mean everyone is like that.

which explains why gays have the highest rate of contraction of STD's like HIV. You guys are always down to f*ck

There are quite a few factors to consider, it's not as simple as you might think.

What factors? Is it education? Because, at least in America, gays tend to earn above average in terms of income and, iirc, are more educated than the average American.

Fact of the matter is, gays tend to be highly promiscuous.

#10 Edited by nomsayin (1346 posts) -

@toast_burner said:

@ariabed said:

@robokill: it wasn't evidence of my argument either when did I say it was evidence of my argument? It was just a scenario I thought up based on the news clip, and I wanted to see how OT would handle it. Again your putting words in my mouth. So now I'm not aloud to talk in hypotheticals.

If we can agree on one thing one fact that kids copy what they see on the telly, that's fact, it's one of the reason why we have age restrictions on tv programmes, games, movies.

Now if we can agree on that then we can also agree that a young boy seeing that news clip, could potentially copy that behaviour, he could go to kindergarten the next day and chase boys around trying to hug and kiss them, the other boys may not appreciate that even though he might just be playing, they might not want to play like that and they might lash out at him and hurt him, which would not be very pleasant.

Now that is how the news clip might be a bad influence, if you still disagree with that then your just being argumentative.

You don't learn to be gay. And if it does encourage children to explore their own sexuality, so what? that's a perfectly healthy thing to do.

"allow children to explore their own sexuality"

lol f*ck off with your liberal trash