mattwbrad's forum posts

  • 20 results
  • 1
  • 2
Avatar image for mattwbrad
mattwbrad

709

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

1

Followers

Reviews: 3

User Lists: 0

#1 mattwbrad
Member since 2005 • 709 Posts

The final grade was based off of the sum of the FPS ratio and the cost ratio divided by two (so they would now be on a 0-200% scale). The prices were averages found over the Internet. The margin of error is less than 5% for cost based off of the analysis done on hand.

If you wish to insert your own prices, feel free to replicate the chart and support your claim. To create a 0 - 1 ratio simply use this basic formula. (Current X - Minimum of X's) / (Maximum of X's - Minimum of X's). Remember to switch the fields so that greater FPS's correspond to values closer to 1.

Avatar image for mattwbrad
mattwbrad

709

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

1

Followers

Reviews: 3

User Lists: 0

#2 mattwbrad
Member since 2005 • 709 Posts

ATI Did not win. Take a look at this table I created based off of the benchmarks above.

http://img70.imageshack.us/img70/3890/videocards62508oa1.png

It graded the video cards based on cost and performance. The color code is broken down into 6 levels from highest to lowest in each value column (bright green, green, yellow, orange, dark orange, red).

  • 20 results
  • 1
  • 2