kilirm's forum posts

  • 27 results
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
Avatar image for kilirm
kilirm

37

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#1 kilirm
Member since 2008 • 37 Posts

I was going to argue, but then you called me a trollish sheeple... Ill go back and play fallout new vegas, dead rising 2, lost planet 2, batman arkham asylum, dirt 2, metro 2033 (dont even try to compare it to the console version), Just Cause 2, Left 4 Dead 2, Bioshock 2, Risen, Divinity 2, Medal of Honor, Black Ops (runs great for pretty much everyone who didnt pirate it), Borderlands, Darksiders, Dead Space, Mirrors Edge, Dragon Age, Mass Effect 2, Gothic 4, Prince of Persia, Assassins Creed 2, and some pc exclusives...

Heck Ill even play the new need for speed you whiners probably all pirated.

TerrorRizzing

I was gonna debunk you again, but you did make such a big fool of yourself with the above post that I can't possibly add anything to it. Thanks!

Avatar image for kilirm
kilirm

37

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#2 kilirm
Member since 2008 • 37 Posts

[QUOTE="RevD_Crack"]First of all, no offense to Kilrim, but your english is beyond horrendous. I mean... seriously "o trollish sheeple" , "fanboyish" "duoply" ????? seriously, this is not a Lord Of The Rings forum, so please write more linear and keep the hobbit phrases to yourself. tyvm. Other than that, I'll agree with your take on us pc folks being duped. Second of all, I'm amazed that I can run Starcraft 2 with my AMD Athlon 64 6000+ 3.2ghz dual core and a 8800GT on medium[ish] settings, but APPARENTLY, a racing game where resources should not even be demanding can't even pull me 40 fps in free roam driving. Can't play multiplayer cause my framerate consists between 15 to 27 fps. Not even turning off all the 'High textures' and all that crap doesn't make a dent on performance. So yes, the game is terribly terribly optimized. People with their core i5's/Phenom II's are too shallow to see since they already have good rigs, but us folks who aren't using the latest hardware are the ones that get slapped and take the toll. Stop defending the game when you know you don't know squat. Black Ops apparently has the same problem afaik. gigatrainer
Not going to argue on your points, but first you argue about his grammar and then say "tyvm"? Sorry, won't count. And for OP, the game on my PC runs like butter(Q9550 with HD5850), yes I am on a far higher end PC. On my sister's PC(E4500 2.2GHz and 9800GTX+) the game runs fine, averages at 35FPS and drops at minimum to 20-25FPS during heavy moments(Collisions, flying cars etc), running at 1440 x 900 and rest at high(whatever I can set). But Dirt 2 is made by Codemasters, Hot Pursuit is made by EA :P, there will be unoptimizations, you can't expect one game to run smooth and other game to have the same level of optimization especially since it was ported over. It is not heavily unoptimized so to say, GTA IV wins the crown for that. Maybe some future patches will fix this one, I'd say hold on to this game.

Thanks for the details, and yes GTAIV was the greatest crap of all time, but lets remember the almost equal b.s. from EA on Shift. The obvious lobby by nvidia to dumb down the performance of ATI cards.. Do you remember? AMD even came to public in an unprecedented scandal and said it was lobby from nvidia with EA... They released a patch after almost 2 months and the game started to run flawlessly, like a dream for me. I smell lobby again if it ran like that on your sis' rig. Mine would be better and has the same performance, but I guess the minimum here is lower than 20FPS, which makes me mad.

Probably they will release a patch optimizing the game after many idiots buy new hardware. Wanna bet? :)

Avatar image for kilirm
kilirm

37

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#3 kilirm
Member since 2008 • 37 Posts

First of all, no offense to Kilrim, but your english is beyond horrendous. I mean... seriously "o trollish sheeple" , "fanboyish" "duoply" ????? seriously, this is not a Lord Of The Rings forum, so please write more linear and keep the hobbit phrases to yourself. tyvm. Other than that, I'll agree with your take on us pc folks being duped. Second of all, I'm amazed that I can run Starcraft 2 with my AMD Athlon 64 6000+ 3.2ghz dual core and a 8800GT on medium[ish] settings, but APPARENTLY, a racing game where resources should not even be demanding can't even pull me 40 fps in free roam driving. Can't play multiplayer cause my framerate consists between 15 to 27 fps. Not even turning off all the 'High textures' and all that crap doesn't make a dent on performance. So yes, the game is terribly terribly optimized. People with their core i5's/Phenom II's are too shallow to see since they already have good rigs, but us folks who aren't using the latest hardware are the ones that get slapped and take the toll. Stop defending the game when you know you don't know squat. Black Ops apparently has the same problem afaik. RevD_Crack

Attacking a foreigner who have learned english by himself with no real courses, both makes you an idiot and flatters me, for if you thought that I was an english native person who had bad grammar, it is for me a victory, really. Thanks for making my day! And yes, trolish sheep, or sheeple. That accounts for 90% of the people who comment in here. But hey, they might not even have reached their 12 years of life yet, so I guess I should not be so mean to them.

Duopoly is a known word for those who know a little about economy. So there you prove to be ignoRANT yet again. And the fact that you know what happens in a "Lord of the Rings Forum" is also telling a lot about yourself.

Well, the rest of your post in which you agree with me is not worth commenting, just wanted you to know that attacking people's english over the internet can backfire so bad at you,,, I hope you are fluent in two other languages as well.

Avatar image for kilirm
kilirm

37

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#4 kilirm
Member since 2008 • 37 Posts

[QUOTE="kilirm"]

The OP is right, this game stinks in performance optimization. No matter how hard the stupid trolls try to vomit the usual fanboyish and sheeple nonsense.

My rig : q9300 , radeon hd4870 , asus p5e3deluxe , 4gb corsair xms3 1333, vista 32bit

No excuses at all, shift runs flawlessly at max settings and have better graphics than this one. Dirt 2 runs smooth as hell maxed, and same thing for the problematic f1 2010, which is way superior in every department and runs way smoother even if it (f1 2010) uses only a laughable 50% of my gpu.

So this game is a steaming pile of aggressive marketing bullcrap.And this is now old news. Gaming companies and the GFX duopoly (nvidia and amd) and CPU duopoly (intel and amd) are working together as to hinder performance on pc games so the consoles wont get too outshined, because these consoles own the far bigger slice on the gaming market.

You dont have to be a genius to see pc users are being duped since quite a long time. They are always pushing us into new technologies that we are not able to use right away. This is bad, real bad, I hope for a patch after one month because by then many retards would have bitten the bait by buying new generation cards and CPUs. And then they can stop pretending our pcs are not good enough to run this way average game graphics wise and unlock more resources use for us.

TerrorRizzing

that doesnt make sense... sure the odd multiplat game doesnt run as well as you would like on pc... same thing happens on 360 and ps3 sometimes too so get that tinfoil hat off your head.

Of course it doesnt make sense to you , o trollish sheeple. Even if you agreed with me.

And of course, trollish sheeple, sometimes they make the games run the way they would have to on the pc, but that doesnt seem to be the case anymore. The market is with the consoles, if you deny it , youre simply stupid or making this up. Clearly the console fanboys would be pissed if they suddenly noticed that the fairy tale about their cheap consoles being more powerful than the mid-end pcs, which are way more expensive than the consoles.

There is no reason as to cap the usage of CPU and GPU like this, if you think this is random, then you are nothing but a sheepZZzzzzz.

Avatar image for kilirm
kilirm

37

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#5 kilirm
Member since 2008 • 37 Posts

The OP is right, this game stinks in performance optimization. No matter how hard the stupid trolls try to vomit the usual fanboyish and sheeple nonsense.

My rig : q9300 , radeon hd4870 , asus p5e3deluxe , 4gb corsair xms3 1333, vista 32bit

No excuses at all, shift runs flawlessly at max settings and have better graphics than this one. Dirt 2 runs smooth as hell maxed, and same thing for the problematic f1 2010, which is way superior in every department and runs way smoother even if it (f1 2010) uses only a laughable 50% of my gpu.

So this game is a steaming pile of aggressive marketing bullcrap.And this is now old news. Gaming companies and the GFX duopoly (nvidia and amd) and CPU duopoly (intel and amd) are working together as to hinder performance on pc games so the consoles wont get too outshined, because these consoles own the far bigger slice on the gaming market.

You dont have to be a genius to see pc users are being duped since quite a long time. They are always pushing us into new technologies that we are not able to use right away. This is bad, real bad, I hope for a patch after one month because by then many retards would have bitten the bait by buying new generation cards and CPUs. And then they can stop pretending our pcs are not good enough to run this way average game graphics wise and unlock more resources use for us.

Avatar image for kilirm
kilirm

37

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#6 kilirm
Member since 2008 • 37 Posts
LOL take a look at the screenshots of FIFA 10 on the pc session , and the console screenshots, looks like it's an even bigger joke than last year, way to be pirated to death EA, dont forget half the world pirates you on xbox360 as well, and you still do a great version of sport games for that plataform. EA issue against the PC plataform is injustifiable to say the least. I will never buy such a stupid game on PC while i have access to PES which most of the versions is superior to FIFA. FIFA only raised my attention last year with the bigger improvement, but when i saw the PC version i almost puked. Glad i didnt fall for the trap of buying it. FIFA for the PC = nono
  • 27 results
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3