@imdaman4realz said:
Damn would yall read the OP? Can yall read? I'm not trying to say that the mario games arent different enough, I'm saying that just because each game is somewhat different, doesnt mean they're different enough to say that new IPs arent needed.
@imdaman4realz said:
Sheep like to go around saying that every mario game feels completely different and the only thing they have in common is mario. WRONG. Ignoring the 2d marios which are all exactly like, every mario game feels like mario regardless of the difference in gameplay. The artstyles are all similar, the music is all similar, the stories are all similiar. There is more to a game being different than just gameplay. I know it makes you feel better with the thought that nintendo makes different types of games just with the same characters, artstyle, music, story, and atmosphere, but all mario games feel more alike to eachother than to other platformers.
There was a reason I kept saying I was confused in my posts. Care to point out in the OP where it mentions the argument of people saying new IPs aren't needed? Maybe if it had that the conversation would be where you wanted it to be.
Even then, I'm not sure what your argument is. Is it that Nintendo just flat out needs to make new IPs? Should they be swapping out the Mario universe out of some of these games and putting in a new franchise in its place? Do they just need another platformer that is a new IP (as if they don't have enough of these now, with Mario, Kirby, Donkey Kong, and Wario at times.)
If your argument is simply, "just because each [Mario] game is somewhat different, doesnt mean they're different enough to say that new IPs arent needed," then I've seen a few people in the thread argue that not many people have stated this. When asked who you mentioned Charizard1605, which is just one person. It seems a small minority think this thought, therefore it doesn't seem like too many seem to hold this view that you have a problem with.
Log in to comment