[QUOTE="iamrob7"]
[QUOTE="way2funny"]
No its GDDR5 thats being used system wide. NOT DDR5. The G is NOT there to denote wether its being used system wide or not. The G is there to denote that it is functionally different than DDR3. Sony just decided to use GDDR5 as system wide memory. Its still the same memory, now just the CPU has direct access to it. And FYI DDR3 is a lot better than GDDR5 for CPU workloads. Theres a reason we use GDDR5 in graphics and DDR3 with everything else.
Just because consumers like you don't understand that doesnt mean you get to change the name, and therefore the meaning, of hardware.
way2funny
Are you not reading what I just wrote in the last two comments? That's EXACTLY what I am saying. 2 comments ago I specifically said GDDR5 is DDR5 because DDR5 doesn't exist. What is it exactly I am saying that is not getting through to you? Please explain to me what part of my previous comments you didn't manage to take in? Was it the part where I said DDR5 doesn't exist and the only thing in the PS4 is GDDR5? How did that not sink in?
I'll say it one more time, I put DDR5 in the title to highlight that I was aware it is being used as system wide memory because that's how it has been reported EVERYWHERE. Dealing with a single person who is obsessing over meaningless semantics is a lot simpler than having to answer 20 responses from consolites who believe I am ignoring the fact that it is being used system wide and not just on the GPU. Although you are pushing it now. Labels are used to express meaning, the reality is far more people interpret it the way I've used, whether it's correct or not. As that's how it has been reported.
edit - Let me just add this as I re-read this line and it is ridiculous;
"Just because consumers like you don't understand that doesnt mean you get to change the name, and therefore the meaning, of hardware."
It has literally ZERO bearing on my point or any of the points I've made in this thread. None whatsoever. Please do explain to me how that affects the meaning of my point?
Right im glad you are aware that it is being used as system memory, but it is NOT DDR5 and is not called DDR5. Its called GDDR5 no matter where and how you use it.
Meaning is about consensus and relevance. That's how language is developed and used. Take the word gay its meaning is happiness essentially, yet that meaning is completely different now, in fact after 50 years or so it now has an additional meaning in a dictionary. Why? because it was used differently by the consensus. People used it to express and label something, a homosexual. This is how all language has evolved.
Years ago I did a physics degree, there are endless concepts and labels used which are applied and used completely differently in normal conversation so as to express an appropriate meaning given a discussion about this or that. In particular with someone who lacks the technical side of awareness. That's how language develops and words create different meanings. It is how language is supposed to be used. To express your meaning in the best way possible.
Your insistence on me using GDDR5 instead of DDR5 in the title reminds me of some academics who couldn't stand to see a scientific term misused from its written definition, even if the misuse actually produced a greater understanding of the underlying concept. I'm not suggesting that they were wrong or that they didn't have a valid point, but for me it's entirely dependent on circumstance. Only when the misuse of a concept/word actually affects the meaning behind the point/concept you are getting across is it worth arguing about or getting upset about. That's not the case here and hence I don't really understand your motivation. You understood what my point was presumably? You also understood that using DDR5 as opposed to GDDR5 mislead nobody in any meaningful way? You understand that GDDR5 has not been used as system memory before? So it is not unreasonable to use a term to describe GDDR5 being used as system memory, seeing as DDR5 has been widely reported and will be understood by most people. With popular associations in mind, why would DDR5 not be a reasonable way to express the meaning of GDDR5 used as system wide memory? It seems to me like a good way to express it. DDR5 doesn't exist as a different entity, so there can be no confusion.
I understood why the first guy picked on it, because he found the post upsetting and had no other viable response but to pick on petty semantics. Your motivation seems to be different though, it's the actual semantics that you are caught up on. Perhaps because I responded to your initial post about something else highlighting its irrelevance. Maybe because you had no response to that, you decided to pick on the semantics, I'm not sure. People such as yourself will always puzzle me, but each to their own ey.
Log in to comment