It´s only based on 10 critics so far. Still playing scores daveekeh ?
There´s a reason why he wasn´t around after the Beyond two Souls review,you know,with that 71 on metacritic and all lol.
I for one thought it deserved that score on Metacritic. And I never used Gamespot score either. However Hermits/Lems quickly pointed out Metacritic when they always said Gamespot is the only thing that matters
Also this thread is about scores, so why shouldn't I talk about scores
so davekeeh since you like going with metacritic a free pc game scores 83 on metacritic (90 user score ) which is the same as killzone 3 ( user score of path of exile is much higher but whatever helps you sleep ) so you must agree then path of exile is as good game as KZ3 but its of a much higher value considering is both free and lasts much longer than KZ3 ?
Killzone 3: 84 Path of Exile: 83
Killzone 3 critics: 85 Path of Exile critics: 10
Not really comparable since Path of Exile only has 10 critics. However what I find funny is that the PC exists for decades, yet it's top 3 exclusives are (Out of the Park baseball 2007, Baldur's Gate II: Shadows of Amn, Grim Fandango). And those games only got rated by 5 critics or so. Not only that the top 3 is actually worse than PS3's top 3 that actually did get rated by tons of critics. Path of exile is just a rotten cherry on a rotten pie
It´s only based on 10 critics so far. Still playing scores daveekeh ?
There´s a reason why he wasn´t around after the Beyond two Souls review,you know,with that 71 on metacritic and all lol.
I for one thought it deserved that score on Metacritic. And I never used Gamespot score either. However Hermits/Lems quickly pointed out Metacritic when they always said Gamespot is the only thing that matters Also this thread is about scores, so why shouldn't I talk about scores
Log in to comment