1Stark1 it took you this long to figure out that DF is the worst at being biased? They always down play the PS3's strength and talk only about the 360's strength. It was their mission from the start of this generation to make sony look bad. At least it seems that way to me, don't know about the rest of you.
[QUOTE="carljohnson3456"] To be honest, the PSN is much more solid in terms of online play. Little lag, and no god hosts like on the 360. Most games use dedicated servers so the games are more solid online. Xbox Live has the PSN in terms of features, but when Sony finally (it's been a long time coming) makes the in-game XMB due out this summer, they'll be much more evenly matched. Not to mention Home.
Right now, only way to send messages on the PSN is to exit your online game and check your inbox. Sometimes games have there own messaging system, as well as invite system.
blackice1983
sometimes i wonder if cows even oWn ps3's. theirs always going to be lag with dsERVERS or p2p . psn lags xbl lags.psn has a couple of d. sever games but most of tham are p2p just like xbl. but psn sucks because you have to quit out of your game to check messages
actually blackice i know for a fact carljohnson just nailed the comparison perfect between both services. I had live at one time and I will always have psn so I know for a fact that carl is right. You on the other hand think you have to leave a game to text chat, lol. You pause the game for the most part but not actually leave the game.
I still have no idea why any one would pay for online that shuts out what developers really want to do. Valve has stated this so look it up if you want to. I am glad I never played online until I owned a PS3. i have no friends to lose on the 360, but I suckered into buying a gold membership for a year. It was horrible. For all the so called superior online service I had more problems than I ever did on my PS3 and it was free. I can do all the things I want in an online service right on the PS3. So my opinion is thatlive is the biggest rip off scandal since Bernie Madoff.
For one the troll used a cinematic from gears 2 and a low res photo of actual gameplay from UC2. How original. How can these guys make a thread like this and not get a temporary ban? This forum is biased towards PS3 owners and lets 360 trolls do what ever they want without getting in trouble.
GGam3r
Why do you call my opinion trolling? I believe that's discrimination. I simply state how superior gears of war is, and defend myself with hard, cold, facts.
Your opinion was one of those kind of opinions that should be left to people you know, you showed no facts what so ever except the best picture of Gears 2 and the worst picture of UC2. You had no cold hard facts, you showed no comparison except for 2 pics, you have no facts about screen tear, framerate, or even the post processing that was going on in both games. My point is you used 2 pictures and declared victory.
That my friend is trolling, and if I am wrong then send me the definition and I will admit defeat and admit I am wrong and you will have your victory. As for discrimination, I am the one being discrimanated against by your cold hard facts.
For one the troll used a cinematic from gears 2 and a low res photo of actual gameplay from UC2. How original. How can these guys make a thread like this and not get a temporary ban? This forum is biased towards PS3 owners and lets 360 trolls do what ever they want without getting in trouble.
If EA thinks single SP modes are done for then our future as gamers will be pay to play a game online. Better believe that next gen will be based off of this strategy, and its fine and all if a game is really worth it. but I doubt it. Especially if I have to pay microsoft to play online, pay for the console, and pay for the game.
Log in to comment