I don't mind delays one bit. If they need extra time to make the game better, I'm all for it. Rushed games are always terrible.

I want better combat this time around. Imagine Ocarina of Time mixed with Devil May Cry. I'd buy three copies just to show my appreciation.

You guys are all hilarious. The difference was 1%. This is essentially saying that EVERYBODY knows both Mario and Pac-Man.

Pac-Manis the mascot of arcades (find an arcade that lacks a Pac-Man machine), and Mario has become the mascot of consoles.

Ask almost any kid who pacman is, and they'll know. Ask almost any old person who mario is, and they'll know. All of this arguing is entirely pointless.

One percent difference. We're done here.

Some of us want the cookie cutter RPG's. I was psyched when I first saw some footage of this game. It finally looked like an excellent SquareEnix rpg with high production values wascoming to the Wii. I'm not made of money, and I like nintendo games too much to switch, so I went the Gamecube and now Wii route for gaming. Needless to say, I don't get to play many good rpg's - I think the last I played was Tales of Symphonia, which was a while ago. (I'm not counting its sequel, since that game was fun, but not awesome.) Throwing critters into each other looks fun for a bit, but not for 15 hours. And if I'm buying a Final Fantasy game it sure as heck better last longer than 30 hours.

Why I can hit the attack menu button over and over in Final Fantasy 7 and never get bored is beyond me, but it's true. Sue me. I'll probably buy this game when it's in a bargain section for $20.

Pikminmcgregor1574