PC will always have the best graphics so that is why there is no point in including it! Why have a contest if you know who the winner is every year and who the winner will be decades from now? when they compare PS3 with 360, there is at least a 50/50 chance that either or may be the best. PC, 100/0 chance. That is not a comparison!
I have to agree with the people who realize that Ubisoft is learning from there mistakes with Assassin's Creed-that's why they're making the new and improved Assassin's Creed 2!
Rofl, the only down-side, or maybe it's an up-side to your idea is that people could have their butts or ahem, other various body parts scanned. Then we would see some pretty interesting characters!
I do have to say that the facial recognition sing in and the voice activation are pure bad ass but, I'm here to be a moderate gamer trying to kick other player's asses (or getting mine kicked lol) and having fun while doing it, not to play a Wii-like, family friendly show of 'giggles' and 'silliness'. I hate both of those words! Wow. That didn't make any sense. I basically bought the 360 to compete with other players in an attempt to be entertained. Watching movies and being part of a massive community was just a bonus. I'm getting the feeling that Natal is going to have less fps, 3rd ps, and action games and more mini and community games. These are not very competitive and I also have the feeling that games for Natal will lack replayability. I still play Halo 3 just about every day. It was released in 2007! Not that it matters, but, all I'm saying is they are going to have to show a LOT more good stuff before I even consider purchasing this-actually, what is it? Is it a console, or an upgrade to the 360?
I definitely agree. I have only played the game for about 45 minutes and I loved way more than Oblivion and Mass Effect. I am not a fan of JRPG's though so there is really no competition (for me) with Fallout 3!
Log in to comment