i agree with you man, but i would still choose shaq over anyone else. shaq may not be the same player he was during his heyday but he could still get the job done. thats because he's a leader like nash, during d-wade's absence, the heat were able to pull off an impressive record which is very unusual for a team who lost their best scorer. shaq's leadership and the heat's determination was the factor for this. im not a miami fan but my hats off to shaq daddy. now when it comes to kobe being the best player, i would say that hes the best damn scorer in the league today but notthe best player. scoring 50 pts and still lose does not make you the best. but it does give you credits for stats.
the slimline ps2 is great 'cept for the absence of the fan that the original has. but nevertheless sony made up for it by adding an 8.5v adapter, smart huh? that's why sony marketing stands out, economy and value for the price of one. hope microsoft can come up with sumtin like this
no offense to you man, but just because kobe scored 65, 80 or 100 means hes the best in the league. there are many factors to be considered to be called the best. sure hes an explosive player, but he simply cant give the lakers a championship run, why? its because hes not much of a leader. kobe is an invdividual, his team knows it, his coach knows it and the people knows it. i respect your comments man but i beg to disagree with kobe bein' the best in the league.
Before t'was michael jordan. not only is he a good individual player but a good leader as well who can virtually bring any team to life. now without a shadow of a doubt... shaquille o'neil a player considered past of his prime but he still managed to bring a title to the miami heat of course with d-wade. shaq was the heart of the championship team lakers and not kobe bryant who still has some leadership problems to this day. kobe is a good player no doubt, but if he doesnt start brushing his attitude and ego probs aside he will forever be noted as just one of the "good players" in the nba today and in history.
Log in to comment