More nonsence that the stuff you see in any online BF3 or CoD match? Yeah, I can take several 5.56 or 7.62 rounds and still run around at full speed, or in CoD's case, have a M67 frag go off a few feet beside me and live just about everytime. Totally not nonsence. Realistic games tend to be very slow, tedious, and boring.
I'd be interested to see how they design the user interface for a gamepad. Specifically, the movement of the arrow if it were to be used. I have it for PC and think if people want to play it then give it to them but I'd like to see how the controls play out. Either way people will have fun with it. In fact the console players will probably have more fun with it due to the fact that there aren't many titles like D3 on console, console player tend to complain less and all other PC users do is blame consoles when a game sucks. The only games that seem to get praise from other PC gamers now are ones that max out your brand new GeForce Titan or your 680 sli setup if your a Intel user. Pathetic.
I remember one of the reviews for Doom 3 where the reviewer said "Games are meant to be played, not just looked at". Apparantly not anymore, not for PC gamers at least.
Not to mention the visual quality that would have been lost by trying to add 3D to everything, especially after the console has been out for 5 or so years when we are running most (if not all) titles on 30 fps or less. 3D is demanding on hardware. I'm really glad they don't care about it.
Do you not know how to read? 360, PS3, and PC are all listed as available platforms. Perhaps it is not out on PC yet, but if you just click that hyperlink I'm sure you can find out when it......... TBA!!! Now go bash some console gamers about how dumb they are.
Metacritic is currently at 82 with the user score at a 7.8. The gaming community isn't at odds with the review score. You, and a few people like you are.
KVO is a joke and I'd rather wipe my ass with any review he writes than read more than one paragraph into it after his RE6 review, which he then took an entire week to try and justify. In doing so he brought in other reviewers with similar viewpoints on the game (who also gave it a terrible score) for backing. Honest debates be damned! I didn't see the guy from Game Informer or any of the other sites that gave the game a good non-biased view.
And way to feed into the "how much were you paid?" punchline. Sure, this guy made 1 million dollars for writing a favorable review (and probably many other high profile titles), while KVO writes good, honest, and non biased reviews and takes none of that corporate money. Give me a freaking break. If all those guys are getting paid off big $$$ to WRITE A REVIEW than I'm in the wrong profession because this is where the money is. Moron.
@BloodyAura Plus knowledge and/ or interest. I don't know too many people that want to learn how to build a PC from scratch just to play games. And if you are one of those people that do want to learn I hope you have a friend that knows his stuff becuase the internet, fulled with it's arrogant pricks and wrong information, is not the place to "Do your research", as the elitists say.
devastion913's comments