crzycespy's forum posts
I looked at the newer 512 GTS' about 5 minutes after posting, and the specs were really really close. The card I have has a slightly higher core (Factory oc'd), but a marginally lower memory (1840 compared to 1900)... That said, it misses out by 4%-10% performance wise against the newer gts (With both at standard factory clock speeds). Yet another benchmark graph comparing the gtx, gts', gt, 3870, and two 2900's. Fun read. Nvidea sure has done it with it's last two 8 series cards. Low Mid - Mid level price for top end performance. Good stuff.If he had been using one of the newer 512MB GTS cards then he probably would have done a lot better.
Bgrngod
[QUOTE="hobbit_foot44"]can i run oblivion with the distant lands feature with these specs?
1GHZ AMD 64 3200+ (I know, it sucks)
256mb ATI RADEON x1300
1GB RAM
I already did the system requirments lab and it innacuratley read my processor speed as 3.2 ghz, weird.
RD_Vel0city
You've got your CPU speed wrong, I have a AMD Athlon 64 2800+ and i'm at 1.8GHz. Im pretty sure yours is 2GHz. Your graphics card is what will be the bottleneck in Oblivion. it only has 4 pipelines. You may be able to achieve distance lands though, all you can do is buy the game and try it out.
My guess would be yes, as I have distant lands on an x700 pro pci-e, and have seen zip as far as performance hit, either in battle or just wandering in general.
Log in to comment