clr84651's forum posts

#1 Edited by clr84651 (5338 posts) -

@indzman said:

@LegatoSkyheart said:

Get a PC. Much better Gaming Device to Invest in.

Very costly for me if i go for a high end system, if i go mid range i'm afraid i may've to upgrade all over again after three years :( Consoles i can enjoy for minimum 7 years without any fear of upgrades. I can't afford a High end PC :)

Don't listen to these PC guys. There's things good about gaming on a console.

I game on a PS4. I recommend it highly.

#2 Posted by clr84651 (5338 posts) -

didn't even knew there was a demo. will try tonight

You have to search through the games until you find one that says P.T. It doesn't show up in demos. Strange!

#3 Posted by clr84651 (5338 posts) -

Im 41. I finished the demo but I dont think I could last through a whole game of that. To much for my ticker.

I played the demo & I'm your age. I can play through whole game. I turn off my scare nerves when playing. It's all fake! I played both Outlast games and loved them.

#4 Posted by clr84651 (5338 posts) -

@Kjranu said:

@LJS9502_basic said:

@clr84651 said:

@OhSnapitz said:

It's not the hardware (perse) that hurt Nintendo.. It was the piss poor marketing, high price point, and lack of 3rd parties (due to Ninstupido's business practices). A more powerful system isn't going to help.

More power always helps. Staying on par with Sony & MS with power would help.

Build a PC then. Games help. I feel sorry for people that worry about graphics etc when games look good this gen no matter the console....and don't think game play matters. Sad. We're really got far away from what gaming is....

Wii U is not a console that game developers want to put games on. If Nintendo was serious about gaming then they would go to them and try to address their grievances. They didn't and never have. Sony is the only one who actually had a game developer assist in PS4's development. Nintendo is a crap company who doesn't give a crap about third party games. They only care about putting out a platform where we can play Mario and Zelda on.

Nintendo needs to be on par with their console competitors hardwarewise, price it similar to their console competitores, go back to standard controls, & regain 3rd party support. Sony is the only 1 of the 3 that moved in the right direction this gen. MS & Nintendo both did lame things to sway consumers to buy Playstation instead of Xbox or Nintendo.

#5 Posted by clr84651 (5338 posts) -

@clr84651 said:

@OhSnapitz said:

It's not the hardware (perse) that hurt Nintendo.. It was the piss poor marketing, high price point, and lack of 3rd parties (due to Ninstupido's business practices). A more powerful system isn't going to help.

More power always helps. Staying on par with Sony & MS with power would help.

Build a PC then. Games help. I feel sorry for people that worry about graphics etc when games look good this gen no matter the console....and don't think game play matters. Sad. We're really got far away from what gaming is....

Power helps, it's not everything. Nintendo should design their console's power close to their console competitors, price it close to their console competitors, & go back to standard controls. Put out their good exclusives & gain more 3rd party support by having their console on par with their console competitors. PC gaming is different than console gaming. Nintendo needs to focus on being a successful console maker.

#6 Posted by clr84651 (5338 posts) -

It's not the hardware (perse) that hurt Nintendo.. It was the piss poor marketing, high price point, and lack of 3rd parties (due to Ninstupido's business practices). A more powerful system isn't going to help.

More power always helps. Staying on par with Sony & MS with power would help.

#7 Posted by clr84651 (5338 posts) -

@jsmoke03 said:

i havent enjoyed a horror game since the first resident evil. my sister was the one that loved horror games specially silent hill games. might have to try another game soon

I highly recommend Outlast. Game is the best horror game to come around since the early PS2 era!

Outlast is as horror as it gets & grose.

#8 Posted by clr84651 (5338 posts) -

@super600 said:

@clr84651 said:

The fact is that the gaming community is better off when Sony is doing better than MS.

Proof; Sony forced MS to not do DRM, used game fees, & mandatory kinect which all make gaming better for the consumer.

Sony brought Bluray discs into gaming which both now use and are better for gaming.

MS started this online charging BS which Sony now does in order to compete against MS. Bad for gamers.

Point is when MS is successful at something that's bad for the gamer like charging for online then it becomes standard.

When Sony is successful at something like stopping DRM, used game fees, or mandatory camera then it's good for gamers.

MS sucks for the gamer & Sony is good for the gamer.

Sony only cares about your money like MS. They will do anything to get your money.

Thing is who charged for online gaming long before the other? Who wanted used game fees? Who charged me $79 for a WiFi adaptor & $13 for each charge n play kit? Sony both are built in at no extra cost.

Name 1 thing Sony did that costs the gamer more that now MS has also done that costs the gamer more.

Yes Sony wants money. At least they're not as eager to charge for things as MS.

#9 Posted by clr84651 (5338 posts) -

@RR360DD said:

@clr84651 said:

The fact is that the gaming community is better off when Sony is doing better than MS.

Proof; Sony forced MS to not do DRM, used game fees, & mandatory kinect which all make gaming better for the consumer.

Sony brought Bluray discs into gaming which both now use and are better for gaming.

That was natural evolution. It was happening with or without Sony. All Sony did was shoehorn it in early and force gamers to pay for it when it benefited games in no way last gen.

MS started this online charging BS which Sony now does in order to compete against MS. Bad for gamers.

Having a good online service is good for gamers. And having a good online service doesn't come free. Sorry, but stop acting so entitled. If you're happy with a free, garbage service then go buy a Wii U.

Point is when MS is successful at something that's bad for the gamer like charging for online then it becomes standard.

Point is, you're talking out your ass. MS was successful last gen and it really pushed Sony. The difference between the PS3 at the start of the gen and the end is astounding. Even going further than the, Sony took the ideas that made the 360 so successful and built the pS4 around it (Social online service / OS, developer friendly etc)

When Sony is successful at something like stopping DRM, used game fees, or mandatory camera then it's good for gamers.

MS has you convinced or you've convinced yourself? I paid to play on the first Xbox & for my 360. MS is just after money. They did it for $$$.

There was no reason to charge for online on the first Xbox & barely any for the 360. There's still no reason for Sony or MS to be charging except for $$$. MS is pushing gaming in a more controlled and expensive direction. Sony is slowing that down a lot. Stopped their DRM, used game fees, & mandatory Kinect. You can and will continue to defend corporate greed, but you're wrong as usual.

#10 Posted by clr84651 (5338 posts) -

@Desmonic said:

@FoxbatAlpha said:

Sounds like more over promise, under deliver. The Sony way.

Cant wait to see the 10 sec load times get tossed out and over looked once it doesn't hit that mark.

Or, you know, you could watch this and have your doubts cleared (about the loading). Consistently on that mark. Very well done in that regard IMO.

Or you can just accept that it is probably running on a PC and the load times will still differ on the console.

OMG!