billlabowski's forum posts

Avatar image for billlabowski
billlabowski

91

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

5

Followers

Reviews: 2

User Lists: 0

#1  Edited By billlabowski
Member since 2011 • 91 Posts

No, and there's only like 10 weapons in the whole campaign. It's pretty sad to say the least. BLOPS 2 is way better than this pile of shit.

Avatar image for billlabowski
billlabowski

91

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

5

Followers

Reviews: 2

User Lists: 0

#2  Edited By billlabowski
Member since 2011 • 91 Posts

Dude, Batman is the most giving person ever. He goes out every night to make sure the citizens of Gotham are safe, raises kids and thinks nothing of it. What do you do Mr. "Lone_Wolf_Lance". Have you ever had your back broken by a 500 pound psycho? I'm guessing not. You need to be more respectful to the hero Gotham needs but no the one it deserves.

(to answer your question I don't think any of this is actually canon, just a quick story to make. Think of it as the "Arkham" timeline and not the actual canon timeline.)

Avatar image for billlabowski
billlabowski

91

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

5

Followers

Reviews: 2

User Lists: 0

#3 billlabowski
Member since 2011 • 91 Posts
[QUOTE="Nexrad"]anyone who claims it is BF 3.5 is a complete moron who is ignorant to all the massive changes in BF4. TONS of new guns, pretty sure over 100 weapons broken down into classes now TONS of new customization options for your soldier and vehicles Levolution, speaks for itself REAL Dynamic maps, not that bullsh*t they do in CoD Ghosts where a gas station blows up redesgned commander mode massively upgraded battlelog with apps and tablet support tons of awesome new vehicles even better graphics dynamic weather new cool looking game modes and more i dont feel like listing everything but you get the idea

So in another words, Battlefield 3.5. Not saying it's bad, I would HATE for the BF fanboy to unleash his fanboy rage upon me. Just saying...it's like a good update to Battlefield 3.
Avatar image for billlabowski
billlabowski

91

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

5

Followers

Reviews: 2

User Lists: 0

#4 billlabowski
Member since 2011 • 91 Posts

Try going into the middle of those circles, look for anywhere a stash vehicle would be hidden; behind a wall, parked by itself, anything suspicious. If you get close enough, most of the time it will just turn to a blue dot on your radar and that's where the vehicle is. 

Avatar image for billlabowski
billlabowski

91

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

5

Followers

Reviews: 2

User Lists: 0

#5 billlabowski
Member since 2011 • 91 Posts
It's texture mesh. The TM resolution on consoles is very low so you're going to be seeing this throughout the game.
Avatar image for billlabowski
billlabowski

91

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

5

Followers

Reviews: 2

User Lists: 0

#6 billlabowski
Member since 2011 • 91 Posts

This game isn't for kids. It's as simple as that.

Sanligo
THIS. Be responsible, this is not a game for kids.
Avatar image for billlabowski
billlabowski

91

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

5

Followers

Reviews: 2

User Lists: 0

#8 billlabowski
Member since 2011 • 91 Posts

[QUOTE="billlabowski"][QUOTE="heytheredarlin"]

[QUOTE="billlabowski"]I got a copy on Craigslist for $70, locally. I'm with op, I absolutely HATE the car handling. Playing on PS3 with Xbox controller...if that makes any difference. GTA IV's car handling was so much better. Guaranteed the first mod that arrives for the PC version will be the driving physics getting an upgrade. I don't know what they were thinking. Dumbing down for idiots I suppose.heytheredarlin

You say that as if the driving in IV was complicated. :lol:

No, you had to be aware of where you were going and how the car handles to pull off high speed maneuvers though...which is not the case in GTA V.

Pulling off "high speed maneuvers" is stupidly easy in both games not just V. GTA isn't a driving simulator.

No, it's not a simulator, it's just called Grand Theft AUTO and I would expect the driving to be less mindless. I see you following my posts, I understand you don't agree with anything I say so why don't you go elsewhere?
Avatar image for billlabowski
billlabowski

91

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

5

Followers

Reviews: 2

User Lists: 0

#9 billlabowski
Member since 2011 • 91 Posts

Can't say we didn't try lol. (Source) https://twitter.com/carolynmichelle

Avatar image for billlabowski
billlabowski

91

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

5

Followers

Reviews: 2

User Lists: 0

#10 billlabowski
Member since 2011 • 91 Posts
[QUOTE="The_Kryptonian"]

Did I say I hated it? No, absolutely not. I wanted to beat the game...is that bad or something? I laugh at the 80-160 hours of campaign remarks as well haha. I've always wondered why people will make stuff up because they like a certain "brand". Anyways, I played my fill, 8.5 personally is what I would give it. Sorry to disappoint everyone lol.

Well that's what a couple of the sites said around the net, but perhaps that's the time if you completed all missions including side missions, Assuming you are telling the truth and not winding us up, answer me this question. In the game there is bus routes with working buses picking up passengers. Question can you take a ride as a passenger on the bus in the game?

I could probably play a solid month. There's a ton of stuff to do around the city, side missions are everywhere, some of them you can do multiple times (it's scored like GTA IV). But people saying the campaign is 80 hours? No. Just like if you played GTA IV's campaign or main missions, it would be around 20-25.