@argothm: You're talking out of your arse. Apple does not have the power to compel any other businesses to provide them their financial records or any records.
Fraud is what's set by law. Apple does not have the power to enforce what they may see as "fraud". They can sue other businesses for breach of contract, or such things.
Apple can update pricing for buying apps to recuperate that 30%, but that also has it's problem. Apple can lower in-app fees to compete with competitors that are bound to come in if this ruling prevails..
Of course, the ruling is likely being appealed, so we will see how things goes.
@argothm:It's not a simple clause. that they can just add. No business would ever give up their private financial records to another business. And there is no such thing as "fraud" because they are not a government entity and/or protected by law. Apple as a business is not above any other business.
@argothm: Actually, what you're saying makes no sense. How will Apple be able to penalize companies for not providing their In-App sales to them? What right does Apple has to this information?
@wolfpup7: The original PS4 and then the PS4 Pro released at $400. Therefore, based on this, Sony won't go higher than $400 for the PS5. This is the magic number. Sony KNOWS this.
@gamerbum: It's a basic console. Not next-gen at all. As I said, it's lower specs will hinder the Series X. It's like it is an Intel i3, and not an Intel i7.
Can the Xbox Series S be considered a next-gen console? It's so weak compared to the Series X. It'll hinder the full capabilities of the Series X when developers have to optimize their games with the Series S in mind.
allever's comments