I think it depends on the game. I think PC gamers are way more uptight if you are new to a game and give you a hard time for it. I was booted from a Payday game the other day because someone told me to do something and I asked. I think PC gamers take the competition thing to another level.

Call of Duty is a lowest common denominator game. That's why it sells millions. It's accessible, and it's fun enough. That said, it doesn't change much from game to game. Changing the maps is not significant enough as is making a new engine or upgrading the animations or even eliminating the terrible lag that is in the game.

I still like Call of Duty as a series, but I really wish fans would see it for what it is. There is nothing significantly upgraded even from Call of Duty 4 to Black Ops 2. Pick 10 is a gimmick and makes you pick multiple perks to do what other games let you do with one.

It's funny how it seems that people think that fps's sucked before Halo and that it was delivered on high from the gods of gaming and delivered us from mediocrity or something. Halo was an alright game but it really shouldn't be considered the epitome of the genre. There are much better fps's that came before and after it. Anyway in answer to the original question I'd say Half Life.

thecrypticodor

[QUOTE="Wasdie"]

[QUOTE="Zaibach"]

So you would rather a HD remake than a brnad new fully fledged game?

Ok Ombre

Zaibach

I'm not a fan of the MGS series. I think it's highly overrated and has a really rabidness fanbase who would buy pretty much anything with Metal Gear slapped on the box.

I am not a fan of Zelda either, but I wouldnt stand for a HD remake of A link to the past just because Zelda fans are insufferable, and believe me, they are.

Kojima Productions havent done anything in almost 3 years, a HD remake would be a monumental waste of Time