Here's all the evidence you'll ever need to justify changing the review setup:

http://www.gamespot.com/n64/driving/mariokart64/index.html

Will a special exception be made to give GTA 4 a 9.6?

which died back in 05 in case you forgot. eitremn

More like murdered back in 05.

and let me do this since you guys all have a hard to couting

1.Julio Lugo.650 OPS as #1 batter (199 PA)Coco Crisp (19)2.Kevin Youkilis1.023 OPS as #2 batter (156 PA)Coco Crisp (41)3.David Ortiz1.032 OPS as #3 batter (202 PA)Kevin Youkilis (5)4.Manny Ramirez.739 OPS as #4 batter (196 PA)Wily Mo Pena (4)5.J.D. Drew.680 OPS as #5 batter (157 PA)Kevin Youkilis (27)6.Mike Lowell.963 OPS as #6 batter (177 PA)Jason Varitek (12)7.Jason Varitek.780 OPS as #7 batter (133 PA)Coco Crisp (33)8.Coco Crisp.626 OPS as #8 batter (74 PA)Wily Mo Pena (44)9.Dustin Pedroia

so where is the 10th spot thats right not there :roll:wavebrid

Among the 9 players listed, there is no pitcher. You must only follow tee-ball to forget that a pitcher must be on a team's starting roster.

A starting roster in the NL has 9 players. These 9 players all bat and play defense.

A starting roster in the AL has 10 players. 8 of these 10 players bat and play defense. Of the remaining 2 players, 1 exclusively bats and the other exclusively plays defense.

As is clearly obvious, one of these setups is in accordance with the first objective of baseball and one is not.

For further reading, check out the wikipedia page:

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Designated_hitter#The_rule

I've never liked the DH rule because it goes against the first objective of baseball (mlb.com):

Official Rules:
1.00 Objectives of the Game

1.01
Baseball is a game between two teams of nine players each, under direction of a manager, played on an enclosed field in accordance with these rules, under jurisdiction of one or more umpires.