@livedreamplay: It's not about bashing consoles. It really depends on how much you enjoy your gaming experience and how much you can afford. If you want to become completely immersed in a game, then go with a PC. You'll spend a little bit more but your overall gaming experience will be logarithmically improved. A casual gamer will most likely be satisfied with sub-par graphics that the consoles offer. Gaming consoles are a good entry point. If gaming is your hobby then a console will never do.

@Zero_Maniac: 1080p is not plenty unless you're anchored to a console. Visually, the step up beyond 1080p is so dramatic I would never go back. If you like pixelated graphics then stick with 1080p or below. If you want truly stunning graphics then you'll want to venture beyond 1080p. Also, Nvidia G-Sync technology is game changing!

1080p on the PC is *yawn* so last year. How about comparing it at high resolutions...4k!

@OneStrong2 I compare PC games to movies. If you want to watch a movie with superb graphics (video) quality then you invest in Blu-Ray and an HD TV. If you want to watch a movie with poor graphics (video) then you watch a movie on DVD or VHS tape on a 32" tube TV. The Xbox and Playstation platform is equivalent to watching a movie on DVD (or worse) on a non-HD TV.

@Gaming-Planet The developers of the game didn't code it to take advantage of the PC's advanced graphics. Sloppy, code porting to the PC.

@nuno999 This isn't worthy of the C64. The C64 would eat this up all day every day.

@StateOfGrace

If you want real graphics the PC is the ONLY way! Consoles are sooo dated! Why even bother!

The PC game graphics will blow away those lowly "game" consoles! Gaming console graphics suck!

Yes, this is one fantastic sequel! The graphics are exceptional as is the game-play. You poor console players can turn the graphics down. Meanwhile, I'll be playing it on Ultra!