Narcadox's forum posts

Avatar image for Narcadox
Narcadox

864

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

1

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#1 Narcadox
Member since 2006 • 864 Posts
I don't think they're that bad. I've certianly played worse.
Avatar image for Narcadox
Narcadox

864

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

1

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#2 Narcadox
Member since 2006 • 864 Posts
I've seen that picture before somewhere... If I recall correctly it's a Photo-Realism and/or a very high quality Texture Pack.
Avatar image for Narcadox
Narcadox

864

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

1

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#3 Narcadox
Member since 2006 • 864 Posts

PS3, 360, Wii, High end Laptop, DS, PSP, iPod Touch, Xperia Play. Too many good games to limit yourself to one system.

Avatar image for Narcadox
Narcadox

864

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

1

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#4 Narcadox
Member since 2006 • 864 Posts

[QUOTE="LastRambo341"]

[QUOTE="taterfrickintot"]

/thread. onlive sucks.

mitu123

*opens thread*

His connection?

We aren't sure of that yet, but even a good connection won't stop the lowest settings, this is one of my best screens:

I don't think it's a connection issue. I get like 8MB over a normal line. Actual gameplay is fine. Nice and smoothe, no input lag at all. Just looks like ****

Avatar image for Narcadox
Narcadox

864

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

1

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#5 Narcadox
Member since 2006 • 864 Posts

Onlive is such a let down... They made out like you'd be playing Crysis maxed out on your TV...

This is what I get.

Avatar image for Narcadox
Narcadox

864

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

1

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#6 Narcadox
Member since 2006 • 864 Posts
So numbers sold x Cost at retail = Profit? Ok then...
Avatar image for Narcadox
Narcadox

864

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

1

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#7 Narcadox
Member since 2006 • 864 Posts
Looks awesome. Can't wait. If you don't like it don't buy it. It's that simple.
Avatar image for Narcadox
Narcadox

864

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

1

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#8 Narcadox
Member since 2006 • 864 Posts
Looks like the only real difference is the fact it now appears to be using the Vanquish Engine rather than the MGS4 engine, which makes sense seeing as how it's supposed to be a faster paced game. Yea they didn't show destructable enviroments, but that doesn't mean it's been removed. Even if it has been is it really that much of an issue? The fact it's being developed by Platinum can only be a good thing IMO. Look at Vanquish and Bayonetta, this is exactly the kind of game Rising was being made to be from the off. Anyone who thought different was kidding themselves. If anyone can pull this off properly it's Platinum.
Avatar image for Narcadox
Narcadox

864

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

1

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#9 Narcadox
Member since 2006 • 864 Posts

No...

I tried it recently to see how well it would work over my internet... Tested Unreal Tournament 3, Batman: Arkham City and WH40K: Space Marine. Chose these games because they all require you to be fairly precise in terms of input and I'd already played them on my PS3, so I thought it would be easy to spot any lagg. I was quite impressed tbh as there was no lagg at all from what I could tell, however it looks like this.

I thought the whole point of the service was so that I don't have to have a massively powerful computer to play games maxed out. Now I admit it looks a bit better in motion but not much. Deffo worse than PS3 and I'm pretty sure my laptop could do better if I actuall istalled them (2.4GHz i5, 6GB Ram, 5470).

Or am I doing something wrong lol?

Avatar image for Narcadox
Narcadox

864

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

1

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#10 Narcadox
Member since 2006 • 864 Posts
You Zelda fans seriously need to get over this. Just enjoy the damn game. Doesn't matter what someone else thinks.