Exactly, the game must have it's bad points as no game is perfect, The fact there are none stated in this review makes me question it's validity and the reason for not including any in the first place.
Yes of course but a game with no bad points at all surely must have a perfect score, no? My main point is that I don't believe this game has no bad points.
Carolyn - At the top of this article, you give the game only good points and no bad points at all. Is this truly the case? What about the length? If you enjoyed it so much, wouldn't you have preferred it to be longer? Do you not feel that the price point is far too high for the amount of "game" you are actually getting? I find it hard to believe this game has simply no bad points at all.
If you truly believe the game has NO bad points, which is fair enough if that is your opinion, then why has it not been given a 10/10? What is the need to knock it down to a 9.5? None of it makes sense and I think this kind of thing is the final nail in the coffin for Gamespot as far as I am concerned.
I'm not here for some kind of political agenda. I want to know if a game is worth playing with both it's good points and bad points and especially if you feel it is worth my hard earned money. What's more, I expect ratings to actually follow the content of the review and in this case, a supposedly perfect game with apparently no bad points at all still somehow doesn't get a perfect score.
@JD_Method Being someone who worked on this game personally, I can tell you that you are pretty much exactly right. The only incorrect thing you said what that this game uses the CoD engine. It was an in-house engine.
Mugen100's comments