MikaelGrizzly / Member

Forum Posts Following Followers
60 94 3

MikaelGrizzly Blog

Why Fallout 3 isn't a great game at all

by on

I am an opinionated person. I like to share my views and I'm quite vocal about them. One of the most controversial topics in the gaming community (though slightly less so nowadays) is the issue of Fallout 3 and it's supposed greatness.

The reviewers were absolutely raving about the game, giving it extremely high ratings and competing with each other just so that they can be the first to praise. The impression you get is that the game really is the second coming of Christ, giving out guilt free orgasms, curing cancer and saving puppies by the mere virtue of existing.

This is one of the reasons why I dislike game reviewers, primarily those that are paid for reviewing the games. There is no neutrality, especially not when it's an AAA game with massive marketing budget... obviously, the game's going to get extremely high marks, since every site wants a slice of the marketing pie.

I'd be glad if that was the only reason for extremely high marks, then I'd be able to make some snide comment about selling out or go on a tangent and rant about the weakness of the human spirit.

But no. The issue runs deeper. It's names are low standards and incompetence. Most reviews read like promotional materials, with almost no mentions of glaring flaws in the game, such as incoherent world that makes no sense, feeble main plotline or characters that have more in common with cardboard than humans. I know the game is impressive at first glance, I've been there and for a moment thought that it was truly a worthy entry in the series.

But, sadly, the more I played, the more I felt cheated. What was promising at first quickly turned out to be yet another frictionless game, designed to allow the player to play with almost no hassle at all. You made a crappy character? No problem, you can max out every skill and stat regardless. You're a bad shot? Don't worry, you have the Godly VATS Mode. Don't like text? No problem, it's not a battle we wanted to fight, so everything's a cheesy summary.

And so on and so forth. Few reviews made mentions of these flaws, most conveniently skipped them over.

What's even more insulting to my intelligence is ascribic poetic and philosophical depth to the game, how it's a deep work on himan willingness to survive, human nature and similiar fancy concepts that are not really present in the game, which was created basing on the rule of cool, rather than any coherent vision of the game.

One thing horrifies me the most - the effect it has on the industry. Mindless consumption of every properly marketed game and raving reviews do not reward creativity, they smother it. It's especially evident in the way te lead designers of the games respond to questions, Emil Pagliuro for instance, ignoring fans pointing out inconsistencies and bad elements, while taking professionally biased reviews at face value, continuously mumbling how great his game is, how great a developer he is et caetera, with not a single shred of humility or modesty.

I hope that one day game reviewers will grow a spine and finally become competent, unbiased reviewers. Not mouthpieces of the publisher companies' PR department.

For the record, Fallout 3 is a decent game.

Direction of the gaming industry

by on

I wonder where the industry is heading to, and the first image that comes to mind is that of a communist Prime Minister of the late People's Republic of Poland: "Comrades, last year, we were on the edge of an abyss. This year, we have made a major step forward!".

Call me an old geezer who can't keep up with the times, but I can't help but mourn how games become cheap entertainment, concentrated on flashy graphics and "kewl" looks, rather than interesting writing, plot, choice and consequence and most of all, engaging and original gameplay.

Bethesda takes Fallout and rapes it, by stripping it of its aesthetic, RPG mechanics and freedom of roaming, replacing it with Oblivion-derived looks and gameplay, making it just another sci-fi shooter on the market. Crysis is hailed as the "next gen" shooter along with Bioshock, while in reality, they offer absolutely nothing new, least of all in terms of gameplay, as "emergent gameplay" is just an excuse for "we can't be arsed to create interesting gameplay, so do it yourself".

And the gaming press supports the dumbification and consolization of the PC gaming, which was once the vanguard of ambition, quality and interesting gameplay, by praising the newly released titles and overhyping them, completely forgetting about what gameplay should be (interesting and original) or (in case of sequels) completely disregarding previous games (vide Fallout 3 or Oblivion).

I pray for a second Great Videogame Market Crash.