MBirdy88's forum posts

#1 Posted by MBirdy88 (8434 posts) -

Any "All in one whats new with windows 10" worth looking at?

#2 Posted by MBirdy88 (8434 posts) -

@BSC14 said:

@MBirdy88:

Wow....different people like different things. Maybe they find the realism more...you know, immersive?

Yup... imaginery hyperspace travel is immersive... the concept of technology that allowed even greater communication distance... UNPOSIMABLE I TELLS YOU.

#3 Edited by MBirdy88 (8434 posts) -

Wait..... Elite: Dangerous has Multiplayer? coulda fooled me.

You can't across star systems because "It's not realistic" ... welcome to that weirdo fanbase that take Realism > Game Usability seriously..... I think this same crap is happening on star citizen and it annoys me no end.

#4 Posted by MBirdy88 (8434 posts) -

@MBirdy88 said:

@FelipeInside said:

@MBirdy88 said:

@airshocker said:

@Nick3306 said:

Difference is, this is a finished, polished and very depthful game purchase.....

How do we know that? The game isn't out yet.

Because its already released twice over? as i said, the only wild card is optimisation/bugs... but the game itself has been drastically upgraded (to the point where you can even play it completely FPS style). bugs can be patched. optimisation .... overcome.

s*ity kickstart/early alpha games that never finish can't be fixed.

But that's a HUGE wildcard.

GTA3 and GTA4 are great games in the game department, but overcome and ruined by the awful PC ports they both were at launch (heck, GTA4 still isn't fully fixed so the whole "optimisation... overcome" point sometimes isn't true)

meh... I have a 4.4ghz Ivy and 970 GTX .... not even an issue.

@MBirdy88 said:

"That are worth funding" ... hah... you'l never admit that they weren't that's the problem.

Yet just because of optimisation and later ports you condemn some of the best released games out. What can go wrong? its unoptimised? oh well..... will still be great and highly modable... and practically have PayDay2's multiplayer mode built into a large sandbox enviroment.

Meanwhile... how is Day Z ... the unimmersive half baked zombie suri.... I mean player surivival game that took a year to add a handful of vehicles in half baked...

Dont talk to me about "worth funding" ..... more like throwing charity money at delusions in most cases.

<-- Irony... Im a heavy Star Citizen back. but I don't care... if it fails I wont lie to my self like some.

Shows how much you know, as I've been fairly critical of DayZ recently because I don't believe they're making enough progress.

Who is lying to themselves? Only the people, like you apparently, trying to justify buying Grand Theft Auto V without waiting on reviews.

yes... i bet you believe that now a year later, wasn't always the case was it? I called it from the bloody beginning.

But anyway both of you fantasying about imaginary "killer bugs" is just getting silly....

Most people hated GTAIV because of optimisation and Windows LIVE related bugs. Somehow... I doubt GTA5 will have quite as many issues.

#5 Posted by MBirdy88 (8434 posts) -

@MBirdy88 said:

@airshocker said:

@Nick3306 said:

Difference is, this is a finished, polished and very depthful game purchase.....

How do we know that? The game isn't out yet.

Because its already released twice over? as i said, the only wild card is optimisation/bugs... but the game itself has been drastically upgraded (to the point where you can even play it completely FPS style). bugs can be patched. optimisation .... overcome.

s*ity kickstart/early alpha games that never finish can't be fixed.

#6 Posted by MBirdy88 (8434 posts) -

@MBirdy88 said:

@airshocker said:

@Nick3306 said:

@airshocker said:

If you buy this title without waiting on reviews you are perpetuating Rockstar's shameful disregard for PC users.

Sheep will be sheep, tho.

Oh no, how will I sleep at night?!?

I would imagine just like most sheep do.

haha thats priceless coming from you.... you've had plenty of sheepish kick-starter related nonsense on here... more so than most.

Difference is, this is a finished, polished and very depthful game purchase.....

Still waiting for a half-way done for many of the kickstarters you've ranted about.

More than happy to throw money towards projects that are worth funding.

Not going to throw money to developers who have a known track record of shitting on their player base before waiting to see what the reviews are like.

"That are worth funding" ... hah... you'l never admit that they weren't that's the problem.

Yet just because of optimisation and later ports you condemn some of the best released games out. What can go wrong? its unoptimised? oh well..... will still be great and highly modable... and practically have PayDay2's multiplayer mode built into a large sandbox enviroment.

Meanwhile... how is Day Z ... the unimmersive half baked zombie suri.... I mean player surivival game that took a year to add a handful of vehicles in half baked...

Dont talk to me about "worth funding" ..... more like throwing charity money at delusions in most cases.

<-- Irony... Im a heavy Star Citizen back. but I don't care... if it fails I wont lie to my self like some.

#7 Edited by MBirdy88 (8434 posts) -

@airshocker said:

@Nick3306 said:

@airshocker said:

If you buy this title without waiting on reviews you are perpetuating Rockstar's shameful disregard for PC users.

Sheep will be sheep, tho.

Oh no, how will I sleep at night?!?

I would imagine just like most sheep do.

haha thats priceless coming from you.... you've had plenty of sheepish kick-starter related nonsense on here... more so than most.

Difference is, this is a finished, polished and very depthful game purchase.....

Still waiting for a half-way done for many of the kickstarters you've ranted about.

#8 Posted by MBirdy88 (8434 posts) -

lol buying books... amateur....

#9 Posted by MBirdy88 (8434 posts) -

@MBirdy88 said:

@cyloninside said:

@MBirdy88 said:

Why not save each month and get that new 1440p 144hz Gsync IPS monitor that is coming out? ok 3x the price..... hence the wait...

But as far as I can see the only way to get the *ideal* experience is to do just that.... Gsync + 1440p + 144hz + 4ms response + IPS colours.

yeah why not just "save some money" and spend 800 dollars on a single monitor *rolls eyes*

yea... meanwhile idiots by 144hz ROG monitors that require you to have 2x 980GTX cards to even get 60 FPS on modern games... yet cream their pants because they can play old s*it at 144FPS..... *rolls eyes*.

Happy to waste money on graphics cards... not happy to spend on a monitor with an actual noticeable improvement no matter what FPS you run a game at (well over 30 fps obviously)

wait... you are complaining about people buying 144hz monitors... and recommending a 144hz monitor?

144hz is a joke anyhow. trying to get 144FPS on a modern game is pretty much impossible outside of $3K or $4K setup.... and 1440p resolution is more important anyhow. IMO, buy a 1440p monitor with low ms. ignore 144hz.

No, the key difference with the monitor I suggest is its IPS + GSync .... it happens to have 144hz ... but that means nothing to me in this context... as thanks to gsync games with much lower frame rates will look much smoother. Ofcourse the IPS part is important for best looking games as possible.... people neglect this when they buy s*itty expensive 144hz TN panels....

I would say splashing out on premium monitors is a waste at the moment until more competition for g/free sync is on the market..... and with better IPS-like colouring coming into gaming monitors.

144hz though is the biggest joke of all..... "dat Counter-strike Source FPS BRO".

I agree with your point. but Gsync helps all frame-rates at an overall improvement. hence why I believe its a far better investment....

#10 Edited by MBirdy88 (8434 posts) -

@MBirdy88 said:

Why not save each month and get that new 1440p 144hz Gsync IPS monitor that is coming out? ok 3x the price..... hence the wait...

But as far as I can see the only way to get the *ideal* experience is to do just that.... Gsync + 1440p + 144hz + 4ms response + IPS colours.

yeah why not just "save some money" and spend 800 dollars on a single monitor *rolls eyes*

yea... meanwhile idiots by 144hz ROG monitors that require you to have 2x 980GTX cards to even get 60 FPS on modern games... yet cream their pants because they can play old s*it at 144FPS..... *rolls eyes*.

Happy to waste money on graphics cards... not happy to spend on a monitor with an actual noticeable improvement no matter what FPS you run a game at (well over 30 fps obviously)