Lord_Norr's comments

Avatar image for Lord_Norr
Lord_Norr

25

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 6

User Lists: 0

@Jamoid

How can you complain about reviews being a opinion when you then state that IGN isn't credible. Isn't that an opinion also? I picked that site off the top of my head, did you want a list of sites? With breakdowns on their review ratios also?

Just because I don't visit the same sites you do, or rate IGN with the same disdainas you, doesn't mean I can't use it as an example, not a point of reference.

Avatar image for Lord_Norr
Lord_Norr

25

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 6

User Lists: 0

@ccrychiar I love it when people bitch about stuff like this. Complaining that GTA 5 got a higher review than this? You been on IGN recently? That game got a straight 10/10, 100%. It was that moment I know IGN had lost it. At least Gamespot is realistic in its reviews.

You basically moaning that Gamespot didn't give this have a 90%? And without anything but GTA 5 to "back you up" you sound desperate. If you don't like it here, please, leave. I'm sure not a single eyelid shall be batted as a result.

Avatar image for Lord_Norr
Lord_Norr

25

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 6

User Lists: 0

I feel like I am going crazy.

Either that or I'm just too old now. But this game doesn't look good, at all. Weapon animations/looks are terrible. The firing from the hip, which most of us have been trained is a bad idea (BF3) works here and takes the genre backwards. The jerky motion of the AK for example as it fires looks cheap. As I said, I feel I am going mad because I seem to be the only one who thinks this. True, graphics aren't everything, but when games like BF3 exist (like it or not), releasing a game that looks and feels like this, is just dreadful.