lol

More simple, slower, smaller.

PC gamers are often older, more experienced, needs less handholding than console gamers, and have better hardware. In Crysis 1, you had big open levels. You had these suit abilities you could switch between. Then they make Crysis 2 with consoles in mind. They remove the ability to switch suit abilities (among other things, like prone). They made much smaller levels. Crysis 2 is a simplified, dumbed down version of Crysis to fit consoles and their gamers better, in other words.

FEAR 2? Same shit. Dumbed down, smaller.

STALKER 2? Most likely same shit.

No. Just "another one of those" to me. There's a million of them, and they all look the same. This one seems to have two different artstyles at the same time, which looks stupid.

Comfy office chair when PC gaming, sofa or beanbag when console gaming.

First one was slow and realistic, which translates to boring for me. Don't care about a sequel, but cool for the fans.

Nope. There are barely any videogame stores where I live, and they sell used games for largely the same as new games, so I don't see the point. Can get a used game for 50 bucks with bumps and scratches, or just get it new for a little more.

Guess I could order shit from ebay or something, but there's no real point there either. Can't find Mario Maker 2 (for example) for less than 40 bucks with 10 bucks shipping. I'd rather just go and buy the game new for 60, and not risk getting a broken/scratched/dirty/smelly game.

If its great despite being a PC series that they change to work for consoles and their gamers? That'd be great. But when has that happened? Crysis and FEAR went from awesome PC games to really bad console games. Thinking the same will happen to STALKER makes sense.

Yup. Quite a few red flags with this game.

A PC game that they changed to a console game. Like Crysis 2, FEAR 2, and yeah. Just what cup said. Will have many cinematics, most likely. They have shown barely anything, which is most likely because nothing is good enough to show.

Highly doubt it will be what fans want.

Kay. I didn't even notice his face. Thought everything looked bad. Now that I look at the pic, I think I prefer the more detailed face on the left. But honestly, they look pretty much the same to me.

Doesn't look that way from what I've seen so far. Would be cool though.

I am. Fallout 4 sucked.

76 looked laughable when it came. It still looks like it's in alpha, but having a good online community and other quality of life stuff could make it more fun than F4. I think I'd still pick F4 over 76 though. You can mod QoL stuff into it.

Is there no respec?